Brave New World

Was it really a dystopia?
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (258x387, 204.59K)

1984 was a dystopia. BNW was a utopia that happened to be populated with morons.

If humanity does not advance to space, if humanity does not guarantee it's own survival by mastering the heavens and the stars, then it is always a dystopia.

Case in point, our liberal democracy is a dystopia as well.

Epsilon minus semimoron detected.

Yes but in the Nietzschean sense, in that it wasn’t a dystopia due to people being misery, but due to them becoming stagnant, unthinking, etc and thus losing their humanity.

Isn't capitalism already doing this?

Braindead and reactionary take.

Brave New World is basically modern capitalism.

That's the thing the world's in such a shit state that BNW seems better than the present day in some ways:

Yeah but in BNW everyone is a sex obsessed furfag.

Yes, and?

Brave New World is incomplete without Huxley's Island

BNW seems a lot more plausible though.

You tell me, OP.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (279x305, 23.7K)

Pick one and only one.

Yeah, people forget Huxley hated unmitigated capitalism (hence the societies creator and original controller being Ford and "by Ford" being a saying) and that his perfect society was a Georgist/Kropotkin based communal society in which everyone had sex and did shrooms all day. He's by no means a communist in the traditional sense, and he openly was against the USSR and Marxism, but he definitely was more of a utopian anarkiddie than a defender of capitalism.

If anything Brave New World is a good example of a SocDem or Technocrat society in which the people are made so drugged and complacent by their own volition that no one questions or has a desire to change their condition. The whole thing is a Camatte-esc nightmare in which humanity is an aspect of capital and is unable to escape. To steal from the wiki for that who don't know Camatte:
If that isn't BNW with it's whole "village natives good, Ford society bad" message, I don't know what is.

BNW isn’t really designed to oppose any particular system, rather it’s a critique of the notion of social progress as the endless rationalization and increased “efficiency” of society. If anything it’s a critique of some aspects of the enlightenment.

Attached: 6e684d001a894fcbcdde4dc36a8c00082907e77845c7b881bd412c7cfd153ff4.png (368x367, 322.61K)

You wouldn't notice the difference though, because you'd be one too.
your entire personality and conception of life is engineered from birth.

Did you miss the point about Ford?

Dystopias are always more plausible than utopias.

The Soviets took a lot of inspiration from Ford's production methods as well, you can do so without being a capitalist.

the Soviets became profit-seeking exploitative bureaucrats from the second War "Communism" was established.

Wtf does war communism have to do with anything? Do you even know what that was?

I don't remember these parts.

War communism and the pressures of the civil war in general laid the foundations for bureaucratization, revisionism, and alienation of the state from the people. This was largely not the fault of the Bolsheviks however, although I’d argue that Stalin’s attempts to combat it only made it worse.

Yes because it still had hierarchies. It was essentially the tower of Babel. The savage was the only sane man in the book.

Because there is only one truth, one good, and a way to be happy. But lies, evil and ways to be miserable are infinite.

This is a lie. War Communism was pretty good, it was the NEP that caused bureaucracy.

The main character is surnamed Marx, his romantic interest is named Lenina.

Yes, but they have these names because Huxley didn't like Marxism and the USSR as well as capitalism, not because the society had Marxist origins (the origins of the society are from Ford). Again, utopian anarkiddie

The society could have been repurposed though to be a socialist utopia if Huxley didn't see the planning of the USSR as a negative.

Even Lenin admitted it was a mistake m8.

Huxley posited that positive reinforcement could be just as effective in the creation of a totalitarian regime as Orwell negative reinforcement could be.

If everybody is too busy fucking, taking soma and being distracted by an endless stream of entertainment they will not care or even notice when an elite takes over.

Attached: hux.jpg (480x283, 61.73K)

BNW honestly depressed the fuck out of me as a teenager because to be completely honest, my interpretation of it was a story about a guy who wants friends to bullshit about Shakespeare and stuff with, but everyone he meets is a genetically modified wage slave who's happy screwing lightbulbs in all day, figuratively or literally, or the drug-addled version of social climbers trying to be the coolest dude at the party forever

That's a bummer, bro. But that's the world we live in now. So get to it! Kill yourself like the savage, wage slave or become a drug addled social climber; the choice is yours.

Perfectly expresses how hopeless I feel about the situation. Reminds me of how Debord killed himself after long before proclaiming that the choice was "revolution or suicide".

There is no hope any more, no hope no hope NO HOPE.
THERE IS NO HOPE YOU'D BE A FOOL TO THINK OTHERWISE

Attached: received_2053698581614434.jpeg (640x350, 28.65K)