CALIFORNIA WILL NUKE FOR GUNS

In a nutshell.

Attached: You_need_assault_riflesxr.jpg (576x853, 173.82K)

Posadist gang, Posadist gang
Dolphins will win
Porks shall hang
Posadist gang

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (994x1000, 2.31M)

the government couldn't stop a one-eyed man and his senile friend in the mountains of afghanistan for a decade, or ho chi minh, or castro running a socialist republic miles from flordia, etc.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (876x584 316.31 KB, 918.95K)

yes that's right America has never lost a war against a lesser equipped poorly organized militia force before in it's history :^)

Attached: vietnamwarmemorial.jpg (2000x1334, 1.55M)

Taliban actually surrendered and it was rejected. USA plays a different game in Afghanistan.

Drones and mass surveillance didn't exist back then either.
Vietnam was also backed by the major communist powers, and the jungles provided a territorial advantage that doesn't apply to the vast majority of the US. Even then, the burgers only lost because the war was superfluous and it eventually became too much trouble (which does exemplify how retarded and dangerous they are, but that's beside the point) when they probably could have won if they were willing to waste ungodly sums of money/life and make the public hate the federal government to the point of communism becoming a popular view.

Most of the american public supported the Vietnam War.

you can't survey everything, everywhere, all the time. you can always dig burrows, hide in mountains, hills and trees, only coming out to make covert attacks. you act as if they have all the bases covered, when I guarentee they don't. even without guns you could write a book on hwo to fuck with their communications, economy and infrastructure

It was at first, but public opinion eventually shifted over time. A modest majority of Americans opposed the war near the end, largely because of personal experience with loved ones returning from combat as well as the feds failing to suppress media reports on how much of a shitshow it was, since the First Amendment prevented them from straight up censoring more than the occasional ambitious muckraker.

If you are organizing anything even remotely threatening to the US, it will eventually notice. It's not like going off-the-grid innawoods with some friends. Defense or insurrection requires a lot of shit to be bought and moved around, and the sheer cost will leave one hell of a paper trail.
The alphabets can also use modern communication to character assassinate inconvenient people.
Real military resistance is far from impossible, but it will either require outside help, or for a significant number of US personnel to rebel. If this happens, civilian gun ownership is a moot point when weapons and equipment can be provided.
It's how the Soviets helped foreign communist movements, for example. "These guys are cool, let's ship 'em an assload of our famously well-made arms."

Not really. It allows civilians to have a high degree of training in usage of firearms. Civilian Firearms are also useful in assassinations.