Should Rich People Be Allowed to Exist?

When you have human beings who are starving to death, who have flesh eating parasites inside their bodies, when you have unemployed men who spend all their time watching anime and browsing imageboards because they can't see any reason to participate in society, when you have massive levels of poverty around the globe, what is the justification for people who own multiple homes or yachts?

Do you think that rich people should be allowed to exist in a world with so much inequality? I was sort Right leaning in the past, because I am concerned about where disenfranchised White men fit into the modern world, but when I started to encounter wealthy whites who I had never really known before getting involved in Rightwing politics, I started to hate them. They had literally nothing in common with me and their politics are based largely in selfishness and desire for inequality instead of based in anger at an unjust system.

What's Zig Forums's stance on all this? Would I be at home on the Left?

Attached: Catholic missionary holding the hand of a starving Ugandan boy, 1980, taken by Mike Wells.jpg (1600x1081, 156.58K)

Literally who is starving? Niggers? Humans keep teaching them agriculture and they keep eating seeds, scrapping equipment, wasting profit instead of buying fertiliser, using mosquito nets as fishing nets and so much more retarded shit you'd wish I was making it up. Accept your stupidity and make a new OP that's not based on niggers.

Okay faggot, then look at people who can't afford housing in first world nations. Inequality is real, and the question becomes "why should the masses allow the rich to exist?"

"no"

Attached: eyiher4vd1v01.jpg (750x755, 33.28K)

As long as you leave the idpol at home, you're a comrade here. Lurk a bit to get an idea of the board first though before posting, but don't feel afraid to ask questions if you need to. We're a class and class stuggle focused board, so you seem like you'd fit right in.

Fuck off imperialist.

Well, how can you not afford living? I can literally just go outside right now and get into a shitty free college with free dormitories, get a state guaranteed job that may also include free housing. Like, when I get into public transport I see an advertisement that basically says they'll suck my dick if only I agree to work as a trolleybus driver. It's not a first world country, but I refuse to believe that 1st world countries don't have similar deals.

I am seething right now, gg

America is nothing like that. Rent is a thousand dollars a month nearly everywhere, and there's no free housing anywhere unless you go through a bunch of government bullshit.

Why not?

He's a Zig Forumsyp falseflagger, don't mind him. He's probably the salty 4/pol/er in the other thread who posted a wall of unverified conspiracy theories and then asked us to debunk them without providing any evidence himself.

Let's discuss this after the revolution, after justice has been served by and on the streets, mate!

Attached: 1455072128360.gif (250x225, 1.41M)

There wont be any revolution if you don't have enough revolutionaries. I want to know what Zig Forums's stance on priveleged rich people is.

I visit Zig Forums about as often as this board and nothing of what I've posted is in any way related to conspiracies. Can't handle discussion, buddy?

If poor people get rich lets kill 'em

It's not about no one being allowed to be well off, it's about billionaires existing when people can't afford to see a doctor. It's about inequality.

Africa stays poor due to neocolonialism, and there are plenty of poor and homeless people in the rich West. Kill yourself.

In America people have the Liberty to become a billionaire if they play their cards right. I do agree that billionaires should donate a considerable portion of their wealth to the poor like Bill Gates does, however, people like Bill Gates worked legitimately over their lifetime to earn their wealth. We shouldn't compare people with no work ethic who can't hold a job and become rich to those who do work hard to become billionaires. Inequality, in my mind, is incentive to work to the top instead of expecting to start at the top from the beginning. Third word countries are a different matter entirely. My perspective here is only with regards to America.

faggot, these tech billionaires are made by the elite. they did not earn shit.

Gates was born in a rich family and was given access to computers before anyone else his age could access them. You're completely full of shit. Are you Zig Forums or Zig Forums? If Zig Forums is actually a bunch of morons who believe that America is a just system then I have no interest in this board.

He more or less confirmed he was Zig Forums here . This board is made up of mostly socialists and communists, the "pull yourself by your bootstraps" argument is a right-liberal and liberal capitalist argument, which we are not. Literally look at any other thread on this board, we literally want to gulag the bourgeoisie.

RICH MAN BAD

Define "rich people". Some people may have more than others by their own accord, but a billionaire is not the result of bootstrap-pulling.

Do we gulag or do we hang them over the ramparts of their villas?

>>>/liberalpol/

That’s a shitty thing to say. I don’t get the term “white guilt”. I’m empathetic to people that suffer for the sheer fact they were born in a shitty place. I’m lucky af to be born in the west. Africans have to live under a corrupt government system. Why are being so shitty dammit?

The Kardashian’s. I hate the fucking Kardashian’s. Fuck them and their mansions. ONE of their handbags could get a person out of poverty - tell me that isn’t fucked up

sogicalisme is wen u kil ric peopl :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

First the gulag where they can work to repay their due to society, then if they act up again, the ramparts.

Understand though that we are against the bourgeoisie, as in the people who own means of production and engage in capitalist reinvestment. We don't want equal wages, just the emancipation of the working class, equality of opportunity, and wages equal to work completed. Browse a bit first at the reading list, try Wage Labour and Gotha Program first as the they lay out both how capitalism operates and the system of socialism that Marx advocated for.
Also try the Warsaw Pact thread

Attached: 18913713980353ef3bc15acad3d161fba34e9299.png (382x597, 180.12K)

This is why our IP count is dropping. Put in some effort and help explain what the bourgeoisie are and why the system is the way it is. You have someone who is half-way there and sees the shit the system causes, it would help if you explained why that is.

Also understand that this would end the massive poverty and extreme financial disparity we see now as everyone would be guranteed a job, housing, and a liveable wage.

First thing’s first: poor people shouldn’t exist.

Rich people should only be richer if they’re successful and hard working, but they shouldn’t be stupidly rich like how we have today…. I think just upper middle class should be considered “rich”

the politically active and connected as well as the wealthiest tycoons and big capitalists would all have to be purged for the safety of the revolution. hard labor to repay debt to society if you are guilty but not worth having shot, re-education if you it seems like you are worth the effort.

ultimately rich people as individuals aren't the issue, even though you can hate them. it is the class dynamics of capitalist society.

No way to enforce this, hard work can't be quantified, I think Vol 1 of kapital goes in detail with this.