Would Government Contractors Be Allowed in a Socialist Society?

Would Government Contractors Be Allowed in a Socialist Society?

A failed vision

Sixteen years ago, Mexico embarked on a monumental campaign to elevate living standards for its working-class masses.

The government teamed with private developers to launch the largest residential construction boom in Latin American history. Global investors — the World Bank, big foundations, Wall Street firms — poured billions of dollars into the effort.

Vast housing tracts sprang up across cow pastures, farms and old haciendas. From 2001 to 2012, an estimated 20 million people — one-sixth of Mexico’s population — left cities, shantytowns and rural ranchos for the promise of a better life.

It was a Levittown moment for Mexico — a test of the increasingly prosperous nation’s first-world ambitions. But Mexico fell disastrously short of creating that orderly suburbia.

The program has devolved into a slow-motion social and financial catastrophe, inflicting daily hardships and hazards on millions in troubled developments across the country, a Los Angeles Times investigation has found.

latimes.com/projects/la-me-mexico-housing/

Attached: la-me-mexhousing-main-20171115-025.jpg (1200x675, 126.01K)

Yes, but only if they agree to have explosives implanted in their stomachs before work begins.

Why's that?

So when something goes wrong we can have a show trial and then detonate them for the enjoyment of the masses, comrade.

D U M B

Attached: lol.png (222x255, 63.24K)

Would Government Contractors Be Allowed in a Socialist Society?

Yes they already are.

Public-private partnerships are inefficient as shit, even left socdems know this. Just use state-owned construction companies so you can get things done on a low budget instead of pissing away public money into private hands.


Kill yourself.

Mexico's a complete mess, you cannot fix the country (its people) in a short amount of time without extreme measures (revolution). For now all they can hope for is to see if AMLO goes forward with the "possibility" of legalising marijuana, and if that would reduce the high crime rate particularly from drug cartels over time.

Under a socialist society everything would be transparently planned so that question is meaningless.

Attached: b6dd6797580c710a0381aa38e8aa96b47f90129c47bb94f5165b74c3ee431082.png (960x816, 509.18K)

Who are you quoting?

No

Wait, what?

...

Does anyone else look at these pictures and think

this is what happens when people don't read Hegel. you fill your head with so much ideology to the point where you've lost all sanity and lose the ability to understand what other people are saying.

Attached: 102b100980ea8132ef0deb47559df32b1892621f51b1053639f2c4cbbe43180b.jpg (144x145, 9.51K)

There's something about this image that makes it nakedly apparent it was made by an extremely bitter incel lesbian

No one knows who BO is, but he’s more than likely a just a straight cis guy.

Its legit what 90% of internet trannies are like, though

samefag

he’s Phil Graves so yeah.
don’t believe me? make a thread suggesting that BO is Phil Graves.

I mean you get banned for suggesting that one transsexual is BO too. I guess the board staff just don't want autistic threads speculating about who they are.