Arguments against free market and individualism

Individualism is a cancerous ideology. Individuality is fine, individualism is sociopathic and atomizing.

Attached: the-ancap-daily-struggle-we-live-in-capitalism-made-corporatism-3433802[1].png (500x853, 191.33K)

That's a bit disingenuous to put compare BLM with the KKK as if it's just the opposite side of the same coin. They're both idpol, both cancerous, but BLM is hardly a militant kill crazy hate group, despite the presence of some absurd members who do actually hate white people.

Also an ancap daily struggle "we've never had true capitalism" and "capitalism is just voluntary exchange"

You should tell him "you know what it is" then shoot

Despite what capitalists tell you, capitalism isn't individualism. They act like it's individualism because people have "free will."

News flash: Just because the government doesn't take your money doesn't make you "free."

If a private business is corrupt, no one can do anything about it. You think Amazon would care about workers going on strikes? One of the main ideas of publicly owned means of production is that the people decide the conditions. If workers strike, you can't make shit, so you have to give the workers what they want. The "workers unions" in America act as if they make a difference in protecting workers against their bosses, when in fact they're more tyrannical than the capitalists themselves when it comes to using other people's hard work to their advantage for personal profit.

You can always change a publicly owned system. Private companies don't give a shit about an individual. Capitalism and "corporatism" aren't individualist. Don't let capitalists use that word, it makes it seem like they have the moral high ground… because saying "you're not individualist?" sounds like "you want tyranny over people's free will?"

Capitalists always say shit like

and

I think that the majority of socialists can agree that we're not advocating for "free money for all just for being alive." They think that's what collectivism is.

Ask him to explain why he believes socialism "suppresses individualism", then point out his strawmanning that will inevitably become apparent.

Why would you argue against Human™ Nature™?

former lolbert here
literally tell him basic social policy or economic findings from a fucking intro textbook
for example, active fiscal and monertary policy triggers the austro-tards
or explain them how debt ACTUALLY works, it will blown their minds
you could test / troll his knowledge by claiming that the Coase theorem disrpoves free markets, even thought it sort of neutral
or compare nations tax rate vs economic performance

bad argument, those two are prime anti-libertarian city(states), that video is retarded, singapore has fucking state owned corporations and private housing is almost banned, singapore heavily regulated trade so its safe from external shocks