Soviet-Afghan War General

Mujahideen were funded and supported by a lot of foreign power including US,Pakistan and China.

So? The aid given to them was military aid, rifles and stinger tubes. If it were a question of weaponry then the Soviets would have easily won, since no matter how much aid the Mujahideen got they were always inferior to the Soviet forces. In fact the Soviets never lost a major battle, just like the Americans in Vietnam. What Mao is talking about is the critical role sympathetic populations play in insurgencies, mainly they act as a logistic and intelligence network. They also act as a background with which to blend in, which is why geurilla forces can appear and disappear so easily. They may not have had a majority of support, but they had enough to allow them to function effectively. If that’s the case then the war is effectively unwinnable, since as long as that support base remains intact they can wage an indefinite war of attrition, which the Soviets could not.

They didn't they were winning. Gorbachev pulled out for literally no reason at all. The fact that it was 10 years long doesn't mean shit… they were trying to destroy a constantly re-generating enemy funded by the only other super-power on the planet.

Except that is precisely it, the USSR beat them in combat, but they kept fleeing over the border to Pakistan and assisted there by Pakistani military and airforces, who the USSR could not engage without causing an international war.
Yes and but that effectiveness was being ground down, and would have been extinguished if Gorbachev hadn't been such a cunt.
Not really, the USSR's losses were negligible and gains were high, while the Mujaheds were losing in the long run in all spheres.

Literally the exact same thing that happened in Vietnam. The US would pound the NLF and PAVN to shit and they would retreat across the border into Laos and Cambodia, regroup, and come back. This still doesn't address the fact that in order to move among the population and operate effectively they needed a sympathetic population. Without one they would have been ground down in short order, since they would have neither a base of recruits nor local intelligence, nor a population with which to blend in.

...

But seriously, In a gun fight I might be fiddling with my pouch for a second too long. I guess I'll just try and to wear it out in the hopes of it getting loose.

No, because the forces the USA pounded into dust were people's forces, supported by the people almost unilaterally and who were not artificially created unlike the Mujaheds.
And it was, the majority of afghanis supported socialism, and the soviets, however they lacked the armament and training the Mujahed terrorists did.
You're talkimn about it as if it's the uSSR's fault that 100% of the population wasn't anti-Mujahed, as if a population is a single united being that can only be one of the other.
LBJ did not inherit the Veitnam war, he started it, not only that but he and his successors put everything they had into that war, despite the anti-war protests.
US's losses were much higher compared to the USSR, despite the Mujaheddin being a far larger fighting force.
An anarchist defending Gorbachev, unsurprising.