Reminder that Third Worldism is, in praxis, futile until this happens

Are you suggesting that western corporations don’t extract cheap resources and labour from poor countries?

Only when the west doesn't have access to resources,markets, commodities and cheap labor, this will cause distress between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie in the first world

I'm suggesting it's not "western corporations", but capital as a whole. The national dichotomy is false and very often these "western imperialist powers" are more interested in creating a framework for capital social relations to develop than "muh superprofits" (for example a lot of the countries that participated in the middle east operations did so while knowing it was unfavorable to their local capitals). Whether a US-based capital has factories in poor countries with no labor movements or it is the local bourgeois of that country who exploits the same working conditions, our struggle is unchanged.

Third Worldism merely requires that the American hegemon fall and for its imperialist apparatus to collapse. It doesn't matter if there is a revolution, a civil war, or a Yellowstone eruption. That said, a civil war is probably the best option because all the other lesser imperial powers in the world would focus their attention there and turn away from their third-world projects. The best possible option for third-world revolution would be a proxy war between Canada, the EU, Russia, and China being fought on American soil.

Attached: mountainbalkanization.png (510x477, 50.33K)

But in practice is there not a net flow of wealth from the global south to the global north?

"In practice" is there not a net flow of wealth from minorities to white males? Therefore we need to struggle against white males.

No, you're missing the point. It's not about where capital is at its most concentrated, or where its contradictions are most visible. The practical implications you draw from this are misguided. There is no contradiction between "the North" and "the South", there are no exploiter and exploited nations, there is only the ever-growing contradiction between capital and labor which finds its way to every pore of world society. We don't live in Lenin's time anymore, there are barely any real colonies or otherwise sectors of the global economy where the surplus extraction is performed in a way that isn't a capital-labor relation. This same dynamic of "more wealthy areas" technically already existed 150 years ago inside the countries themselves, and to an extent it still does (compare northern and southern italy, or the big LA suburban centers versus rust belt inner cities in the USA, or generally urban vs rural areas inside capitalist countries, etc) and yet when the capitalist historical agenda called for national unification against feudal and petty-owner localisms, Marx and Engels understood it as historically progressive and in need of superation, not crushing.

The only possible direction in the 21st century is that of transnationalism. Anything other is distinctively reactionary, and this includes third world movements. Where I live (Argentina), the peronist 'socialdemocrats' always attempt to formulate this dichotomy between the exploiter imperialists (nowadays they call it simply 'neoliberalism') and the exploited nation ('the people') and the trot-dominated left even humours them in some of these calls, claiming that the country is in need of national liberation as if it was a colony. This is laughable and only responds to petty-bourgeois insecurities and intra-bourgeois surplus scuffles. There is no nation to be liberated, no 'people', only the working class, which, again, can only possibly be transnational. Otherwise communism is doomed.

Synthesis between SJWs and MTWs when?

In practice they already are the same, and we call them twitter ☭TANKIE☭s.

I'd actually agree with you that capital has transcended national boundaries and that its inaccurate to suggest that imperialism has a national character. Your earlier posts just made it sound like you doubted the existence of imperialism in the modern era altogether.

I do not wish to be ruled by commissar jamal or commissar Cletus