Why do certain resourceful third-world countries like the gulf countries...

Why do certain resourceful third-world countries like the gulf countries, chile and argentina have so high living standards, whilst other countries with just as many resources like Angola and Congo are poor hellholes? What does the west gain from the proles in the gulf countries being so rich?

Attached: saudiarabia.GIF (388x260, 6.58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/01/saudi-arabia-riyadh-poverty-inequality
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Arabs can build civilizations, blacks can't.

its resource exploitation either way.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

What are you taking about? The proles in the Arabic states are poor Indian and Pakistani slave workers that sometimes even outnumber the native citizens.

You have any proof/numbers?

Probably cause they haven't been as affected by imperialism as other countries. Now, I'm chilean and obviously I'm fully aware that my country has been a victim of american imperialism (and Argentina as well) but compared to what almost all of Africa went through, it's a massive difference.

theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/01/saudi-arabia-riyadh-poverty-inequality
Found the retatard

Attached: 1518026528356.png (485x443, 22.91K)

Attached: GCC_Map_Orig.png (604x415, 503.17K)

This thread again? There are many specific reasons for that.
Angola and Congo both were cold war battlegrounds. Angola specifically had to fight in independence and civil war. Congo, Zaire was western puppet and then battlefield of two Congo wars.

During cold war, during decolonization, west gave certain countries freedom, but in turn local monarchs had to be pro west. Cetain countries like Egypt,Iraq and Syria had revolutions and allied with Soviets.. Anyways, in tradition of capitalism, gulf states have large wealth inequality , but overall they are just lucky that their masters won the cold war.


Yes! Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have more emigrants that locals

Attached: post colonialism.png (918x631 71.81 KB, 546.52K)

It takes seconds to google such things.

Attached: nazbol.jpg (213x341, 9.76K)

Despite the long-lasting damage done by western-backed dictatorships, Chile and Argentina are doing well (by latin american standards) because of decades of developmentalism.

Why isn't every country developmentalist then?

GTFO HERE YOU FUCKING RETARDED CUNT GO BACK TO HALFCHAN

As far as I know multiple countries like Ethiopia,Nigeria and Egypt are.

So eventually they will also have high living standards?

If I recall correctly, there is left wing school of thought that promotes idea that sooner or latter all nations will develop and communism will come naturally.

This, just because they have a bunch of fancy huge skyscrapers doesn't mean they're all well-off. The proles in many of these countries face borderline slave tier conditions assuming they aren't actual slaves effectively.

oil and trade you retard. and a population that knows it has something worth squat.
most of africa is too busy cutting off hands and turning them into magic healing soup to establish a domestic mining company

You do know that North Korea has many African friends?

so?
when a population doesent have the capacity for class and social conciussnessnoone should be surprised theyre being exploited.your retarded attempt at a fallacy here doesent change that

It's not fallacy I am surprised that someone with Juche flag is hating on North Korea's main allies. Having said that exploitation and poverty exists in the west too. It's just better of because of geography.

Attached: Hundrets of years.jpg (850x400, 65.59K)

hahahahahahhahahahahaha
t. argentinian

You can't even spell shit, I'm left wondering whether you have the brain capacity. African socialists are uniformly based

Attached: sankara.jpeg (1024x614, 107.78K)

Latin America in the 1880s was rich as the rest of the West, Munroe from the 1890s onwards and the depression fucked them up bigtime (since they were bound to the US) which is why they are like that now. Latin America economically is what Russia would be like without 1917.

sankara was based untill they killed him and what followed was just a shitstorm of incompetence.

Indeed. Burkina Faso, unfortunately, has one of lowest literacy rates, life expediencies, caloric intakes in the world. It's pretty poor chaotic place.

Imagine if there was an Arab Lauren Southern who presented this as some kind of cultural marxist conspiracy to genocide and "replace" the glorious Arab people with filthy immigrants

Attached: are u trying to spook me.jpg (215x234, 10.7K)