So you ARE saying a tossed coin has free will.
The free will question
Nathan Carter
Owen Morris
Sure, some outcomes are more likely than others, however wouldn't this line of reasoning create a kind of stalemate where one can neither say that the future is predetermined but at the same time cannot say that individuals have free will?
Connor Green
...
John Edwards
Pilot-Wave/Bohm Theory. Cockshott did a video on it, but you can find other sources on YouTube or wherever. The Copenhagen Interpretation is just idealist bullshit.
Xavier Harris
If your "decisions" are made from a combination of deterministic forces and probabilistic forces, you still have no more free will than a tossed coin because you aren't actually making decisions. You're just a subject of forces outside your control. The fact that you can't squeeze free will into this state of affairs isn't proof that I'm defining it wrong - ITS PROOF THAT FREE WILL DOES NOT EXIST
Oliver Hernandez
Aiden Stewart
no because probability is still zero-sum.
if something extremely unlikely happens now, that means something extremely likely is probably gonna happen after
Kevin Martinez
In the highest truth time isn't real the way think it is, nor causation. So the question is a bit silly. Insisting on the determinism of physical laws is meaningless since we don't know the physical laws. Complete physics and get back to me lol. But by then you'll realize that nothing is causing anything, there is only a timeless singularity
Robert Gomez
How does that prove free will doesn't exist? You still haven't done this. You haven't demonstrated that free will is incompatible with determinism, nor that nature is fundamentally deterministic, you've just restated that in various ways.
Where's the proof?
Liam Cruz
You don't get to pick and choose physical theories based on whats most convenient for your philosophy.
Once again - the decisions of a magical soul piloting your body from outside of material reality would be "deterministic". Your "free will" would require people not to have any personality or thought guiding their actions to be real, which is just about the opposite of what people first think of when they think of "free will", whether or not they can make and act on their own choices.
You're disproving your own useless autistic definition of "free will" which you've defined to be self contradictory nonsense. Anyone should be able to see that what you're talking about doesnt real because it doesnt even make sense, but it doesn't capture what people mean when they talk about free will or carry any of the implications anti-free will fags jump to.