Is sexual deviancy a product of capitalism?

Did capitalism give me an intense longing to fuck Judy Hopps?, is it just a side effect of the internet finally giving a voice to people with unusual fetishes?

Attached: C3hVlSNWQAAg_zx.jpg (1200x798, 157.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece
stalinsociety.org/2015/04/08/homosexuality-in-the-ussr/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Ancient Greece would say no.

If i'm not wrong homosexuality was popular among all Greece, while pedophilia was just a thing among the rich?

why are you forcing me to call you a retard?

Further proof the working class are inherently queer.

too vague of a question that probably belongs in /leftytrash/ and not enough technical tools (reverse engineering of the human brain and real-time analysis of incoming information from humans' sensors) to analyse and answer it. all one can do is make up indefinite theories.

No, you're just fucked in the head. Many people are, to some extent, and it's harmless if your extent is limited.

It's a product of your mother.

Homosexuality in Greece was more a form of advanced misogyny.

Elaborate.

The Greeks hated women so much they stuck to pedastry, but make no mistake, they weren't gay. So the math works out like this

That's the weirdest shit i've ever heard.

Spooked

Yes, sage

'kay thanks

Can you prove it?

No it's caused by a bilatteral brain wiring and early experiences during puberty and first sexual encounters. Look it up.

my cousin gave me my first kiss and i love incest porn, i guess there's that. doesn't really explain the rest.

Here's a Wikipedia article that goes more in-depth with the sociology of it all, with mentions to how it affected women: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece

So that why Jews love big noses.

Attached: bette-midler-1-1024.jpg (1024x768, 250.61K)

Ancient Greece invented Privatization.

Unironically yes, fuck the rest of the posters here, it's legit.
This is Zig Forums you know the board that says fuck the myth of "muh western culture" Regardless, fucking a man and fucking an animal ain't the same shit.

The reason you want to fuck Judy Hopps is the same reason some people have the intense desire to fuck the shapeless blobs that are Steven Universe characters. They associate with the show/characters and at some point become obsessed to the point of sexuality. It's just another waifuism shitbag. To use another user's words, waifuism is a fantasy about being with and having a relationship with a character, creating unrealistic expectations and thus being unable to function in real life. From any logical point of view, being a furry is pointless, your fetish is essentially an escapist fiction rather than dealing with, living in and enjoying real life.

I don't really engage in waifu stuff, i do have an idealized partner but i dislike to talk to the waifu community. I like some pics in rule 34 that could be considered furry but outside of that i don't have a fursona, though being a furry seems like a very tricky thing to define. Also i want to fuck lapis lazuli.

Naruhodo

Frankly that's just your brain being influenced by your own sexual hormones. It's why there is the running joke that guys have 2 heads, and only enough blood for either one or the other to function.

I can explain it but frankly the two pictures I''m posting are far better at doing it. Please enjoy

Attached: real questions monstergirl.png (1200x349 19.78 KB, 98.08K)

Spartan Agoge as well. So anytime some muh western civilization incel starts talking about based Sparta and evil women you can tell him women slept around and regularly constantly cucked their husbands, ran the households could own limited land and finances (unlike basically everywhere else in Greece) and the men all fucked each-other starting from 12 and up and wives had to crossdress as male when they first fucked because the males had only fucked other males for years so women would freak them out.


Also here's your answer OP, take foot fetishes for example many form because of events like being under the table when you were young and the image of feet got imprinted into your psyche. Or domination fetishes coming from early abuse or having that one aggressive tomgirl friend growing up.

I can relate to the second one. My teacher once told the class she had a friend who married the first girl he met at work, his first female friend. Having a background based on zero friends really fucks up with you, you can't go from friendless to wanting a girl that easily, you first have to know if you really like a girl or if you really are that desperated.

I don't know if that was your point at all.

Is it written by someone that isn't a Jew or a Christcuck?

I can't believe that guy was a fucking jew, he was my favorite.

It's even weirder. In order to get around the "no buttsex" rule they did intercrural sex. Pic related (but hetero adults).

Attached: ForthrightIncompleteEkaltadeta-max-14mb.gif (444x250, 12.2M)

capitalism in combination with mysticism. Mysticism to imbed these utterly irrational ideas of moral asceticism in people's heads, capitalism to enable and exploit that when the suppressed sexuality inevitably erupts all misshapen and retarded. especially the modern phenomenon of confusing reactive sexual hedonism as a product of sexual anxiety for the genuine emancipation of natural sexuality.

Yeah, essentially that was my point, only instead of replacing it with the first person you meet and vaguely like, it's replacing them with a fictional one.

Good video. Love how comfortable those actors are with each other even if he ended up being to big.

thats hotter than buttsex ngl

Yes, read Origin of the Family.

reminds me of how protestant girls in the US have buttsex to stay "virgins"

Transgression is inherently a social construct. Unless your sexual actions amount to violence, you do not violate the human emancipatory project. This is reflected most deeply by the concept of consent. Outside of socially conditioned mandates, one does not commit sin or wrongdoing by not adhering to social conditioning.

Rape in text, auditive and visual form is a fetish for me, however actually doing it myself doesn't seem like something that would be pleasing.

Some cartoon characters are made to be sexually appealing so people enjoy them more. Why do you think it's weird to want to fuck a character designed to make you want to fuck it?

This.

If anything all capitalism did was make your sexual interests so bland and basic that it was easily commodifiable and all they have to do is give something a big ass to get you to spend money.

Actually, thanks for putting that in context for me. In the case of otaku media (weebshit), highly sexualized characters are all over the place as a way to exploit the brain-damaged hikkis who watch that shit. So shows will end upbeing super pornographic to sell sex stuff merchandise at exorbitant prices.
Of course, the same applies to toys. I don't think SEX BAD like a certain person here, but capitalism has an interesting effect on otaku sexuality by maximizing erotic design.

Attached: Shin Megami Tensei if... (J).006.png (256x224, 8.07K)

Do you have any sources the latter part of your post?

Focusing on visual appeal may be seen as basic, but that is often a large part of human sexuality. And of course this aspect is an easier one to exploit and monetize, so it is not a surprise that they do so liberally in media today. So what is really bland or basic? You underestimate the visual aspects and character ques that creators
have to consider to create the design of a character like Judy Hopps, and overestimate how many different characters an individual like OP unerringly lusts after. We shan't overlook the finesse that does go into designing and appreciating sexy cartoon bunnies.

Most Greek male/male sex was intercrucal (between the thighs), not anal. They generally considered the latter deviant behavior, as well as maintaining a sexual relationship very far beyond the eromenos's youth, classically around the first appearance of facial hair. Part of the duty of the erastes was supposed to be education and introducing the boy to wider society, although it wasn't absolutely necessary to participate in a pederastic relationship to belong as a citizen. It did help.

Thigh high life bby

Attached: thick-thighs-save-lives-but-thigh-highs-are-my-demise-13052079.png (540x526 141.43 KB, 55.88K)

Actually yes. We don't see these kinds of sexual fun in the USSR or in North Korea. There is no reason to have it and plenty of research on how harmful pornography can be to a person which would explain the government censoring it.

However under capitalism porky profits from people's sexual deviancy

Attached: 1397541873075.jpg (540x632, 124.76K)

Only because it's illegal to be gay there

You base this on what? It was never illegal to be gay in the USSR, it was treated as a medical issue and only criminalized for pederasty, in other words homosexual paedophilia.

stalinsociety.org/2015/04/08/homosexuality-in-the-ussr/

So conversion therapy? Sounds like it was illegal to me.

No you fucking burger brainlet, not everything is like in the USA you mook.

So what did they do with your sexual orientation?, was it literally like gays in the US plus it's treated like a medical issue but nothing to worry about?

NO it wasn't. You were simply considered to have a mental condition, unless you were being a criminal pederast, you were basically just another citizen of the USSR, no forced meds, nothing, just a psyche evaluation. Sex lives in the USSR were very quiet and private, as they should be, thus gays weren't persecuted because no-one saw it and no-one cared to look for it.

Sounds neat.