HAPPENING! PETERSON SAYS HE WOULD DEBATE ZIZEK

Carson Nguyen
Carson Nguyen

If Jordan Peterson is now prepared to debate Zizek, will he have the balls to face Richard Wolff in a debate?

Attached: CC16C99B-B13B-4254-A95F-8ED6E0736CFD.jpeg (303.22 KB, 1169x1388)

All urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/xdJaDqm1RY4
youtu.be/qoHjX2vQgbQ?t=185
ssa.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2017
youtube.com/watch?v=Yn-Vf1-1hrU
twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/958113185914998784
twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1074314203501088774
youtube.com/watch?v=1WMcmRWzBjs&t=0m09s
zigforums.com/thread/2757537/right-politics/happening-peterson-says-he-would-debate-zizek.html
slate.com/human-interest/2018/12/jordan-peterson-slavoj-zizek-fight.html
quillette.com/2018/06/01/centrists-really-hostile-democracy/

Ethan Cox
Ethan Cox

Jordan Peterson is now prepared to debate Zizek
If it goes down, it will go as follows:
10% Luck; 20% Skill; 15% Concentrated Power of Will; 5% Pleasure; 50% Pain. 100% Reason to never do again.

Attached: 1c831d92aaf7bea00841af59404b03ced10a4f80660c55c80077a2f456a743c0.jpg (288.2 KB, 512x512)

Levi Jones
Levi Jones

Okay now this is epic

Justin Butler
Justin Butler

What would they even debate about? Peterson's lies and strawmen? Peterson has been dodging debates for such a prolonged period of time, I have a hard time seeing this happening.

Samuel Martin
Samuel Martin

Zizek is not my cup of tea.

Attached: 310bf123606cfb1986bad8b0ae289dfb3f39458fa400ad86208ff8d2734f458a.jpg (94.24 KB, 599x560)

Joshua Miller
Joshua Miller

Peterson responded to Wolff by the way. Hilarious

youtu.be/xdJaDqm1RY4
MUH NAZIS

Hudson Morales
Hudson Morales

Who the fuck are Jordan Peterson and Zizek and Richard Wolff?

Leo Nelson
Leo Nelson

sniff man versus tard kermit
fucking steven pinker as the moderator
This would be the biggest dumpster fire of a 'debate' were it ever to actually take place. Peterson would renege on any actual discussion of the material in favor of continually insisting that the debate take place within the purview of his symbolic system of meaning, ultimately resulting in a half-dazed and sob-ridden ramble about the iniquities of not catering to him and his feelings. Pinker will spend the whole of the time unable to do anything of substance past incessantly jerking off to the sound of his own voice and his idea of an 'empiric trend' towards the neoliberal end of history - backed up with his stuffed fucktoy of Francis Fukuyama. Zizek will win by virtue of being the only one whom no one could actually tell what he was saying, meaning exponentially less awful than both the moderator and his opponent. At the close of the debate, they realize that Zizek was actually just some coked out tweaker and that the real Ž never knew about the thing and was in Ljubljana writing his latest critique all about how the debate was symbolic of our place within the capitalist order.

Peterson would, of course, claim he won regardless

Grayson Robinson
Grayson Robinson

Zizek is the host of popular American podcast "Cumtown". No idea who the other two are.

Hunter Clark
Hunter Clark

being this new

Connor Gomez
Connor Gomez

Jordan Peterson
<"clean up your room" ebin self help man
VS
Zizek
<"Sniff *tugs shirt*" ebin pervert ideology man
&
Richard Wolff
<"Coops are socialism" ebin economy man

Liam Ross
Liam Ross

Three human embodiments of pure spook.

Gavin Price
Gavin Price

caring about Peterson
Why? The man is beneath you, and he'll likely bail out of this like every other time because he's a coward who knows actual intellectuals, or even college kids who actually read books, would tear him to shreds.

That's not an accurate description of Wolff's views, he just sees coops as the best tool, and market socialism the best transitional phase, in the direction of a post-market economy.

Nathaniel Ramirez
Nathaniel Ramirez

<What would they debate about?
Freud, the dude who mentored both Lacan and Jung? Liberal identity politics, which they've both spent a large part of their stagetime attacking, but from different angles? Incels, patriarchy, the internet, freedom of speech, there's so much they could at least pretend to create a meaningful debate from.
These two were made for each other.

Wolff is an edgy Keynesian just like Piketty (who works for the P"S" in France), he hasn't made any significant contribution to Marxist political economy let alone philosophy.

Jace Thomas
Jace Thomas

thinking Wolff’s advocation of co-ops is not just a means to an end
He explained this recently in a talk with some smaller Youtuber

Nathaniel Smith
Nathaniel Smith

Jordan Peterson responds to Wolff
dude but what about nazis lol

Attached: 3dcbc8d1a0ae6476b7fffab20d227fa3c0bfb9e9e4fd44cc07cd674f2a313be2.jpg (10.17 KB, 565x354)

Easton Sanders
Easton Sanders

Why?
It's funny to watch people fall from heights.

Jonathan Adams
Jonathan Adams

That's not an accurate description of Wolff's views
Neither are JP or Ziz/
Twas merely banter lads.

Benjamin Carter
Benjamin Carter

you spelled P.'.S.'. wrong

Isaiah Walker
Isaiah Walker

If Peterson constantly talks about the 900 million dead and evil Stalin, they should get an actual Marxist-Leninist to refute all his claims, not Zizek.

Jace Allen
Jace Allen

Peterson vs Jason when

Aiden Williams
Aiden Williams

kek

Jace Rogers
Jace Rogers

MLs are fucking stupid though. defending the USSR to the death is pointless since it clearly had many flaws.
Zizek's not going to debate Peterson. He said that he personally hates going to debates and probably only does it with people he can trust to be academically honest ie not Peterson.

Tyler Kelly
Tyler Kelly

defending the USSR to the death is pointless since it clearly had many flaws.
And many upsides. It should be defended, while acknowledging the failures (when they actually happened)

Charles Sullivan
Charles Sullivan

Zizek is going to defend the USSR to the point he makes Peterson cry and it's gonna be epic. Screencap this post.

Chase Roberts
Chase Roberts

Yea, Zizek's usually been pretty content with condemning USSR, but Peterson might annoy him just enough to go full Grover Furr mode. That *would* be epic.

Jonathan Garcia
Jonathan Garcia

would
would

Kevin Ortiz
Kevin Ortiz

Fuck.
' ' would ' ' then to be would
*would* doesn't look as good as would

Colton Sanders
Colton Sanders

FCKING AUGHGH

Attached: 5Bqi-470bvi-1Am8DtInmA28jNk5GgbHczBfbs4Pz40.png (350.81 KB, 960x960)

Carson Green
Carson Green

He should go ahead and do it. He's already been locked out of the radlib publications according to his own account

Juan Ross
Juan Ross

I'm sure half this shit doesn't work anymore.

Levi Murphy
Levi Murphy

nice discord formatting friend

Landon Martin
Landon Martin

radlib publications
What are these?

Juan Clark
Juan Clark

test
test
test
test
test
$$T$$
test
$$\color{red}{test}$$
$$\left[\frac{NAZBOL}{GANG}\right]$$

Justin Cooper
Justin Cooper

any time, any place
Why is this faggot such a passive-aggressive inferiority complex ridden brainlet? He thinks that intellectual debates are a substitute for lobsters physical fighting and chopping off their limbs.

Lucas Perry
Lucas Perry

I still sometimes break out into fits of laughter because of that time peterson got into a fight with a zizek twitter bot

Landon White
Landon White

can the mods please enable latex? it would make it much easier to discuss economics.

Alexander Scott
Alexander Scott

Pretty sure it was disabled sitewide and our BO is a faggot who wouldn't do it anyway.

Joshua Gutierrez
Joshua Gutierrez

BO is a fag but the vols generally aren't.

Michael Rivera
Michael Rivera

Only board owners have access to stuff like that, vols are janitor tier as far as permissions go.

Alexander Murphy
Alexander Murphy

should lobsters be allowed to wear makeup to work?

Justin Clark
Justin Clark

Guardian for one

Zachary Gonzalez
Zachary Gonzalez

What did he do to make them cry?

Aaron Clark
Aaron Clark

"Well you see *sniff* when you look at Stalin he, how should I put it, did *scratches nose* uh, nothing wrong. There is old Yugoslavian joke *tugs shirt* ah ah, a vagina and penis blah blah blah, you know, kulaks deserved it yes *sniff*"

Dominic Ortiz
Dominic Ortiz

Coops are socialism and market socialism is socialism

David Price
David Price

it's utopian socialism

Benjamin Reed
Benjamin Reed

Heh'd

Jackson Sanchez
Jackson Sanchez

a youtube video where every comment is worthy of upvoting

Attached: 20-15-39-25.png (129.05 KB, 352x405)

Gavin Diaz
Gavin Diaz

coops are comparable with Étienne Cabet’s utopian literature and socialist colonies and Edward Bellamy’s utopian literature
“no”

Eli Rivera
Eli Rivera

there's only two kinds of socialism: utopian socialism and scientific socialism. yours is the former.

Isaac Ross
Isaac Ross

"Yes, I'm TOTTALLY willing to accept the horrors of 20th centtury socialism, Stalinism and so on. What I'm simply saying is this *sniff* *scratches nose* ARE we aware that our condemnation of these regimes is puurely ideological in the most primal sense of the word. *tugs shirt* Did you know - and I loove this - did you know that now even right wing historians like Timothy Snyder and Stephen Kotkin, they now admit that you know guulaags and famine in Ukraine and so on didn't kill nearly as many people as we've been led to belief, Holodomor you know didn't really happen. *sniff* But NONE THE LESS we ACCEPT that these things, in a sense happened, even as we know they diidn't. In this sense the evils of 20th century Socialism function - and I loove this story - they function as Niels Bohr's horse shoe *sniff* as the pure object of ideology you know - it works even if you don't belieff innit, haha. *scratches nose* In the same way we don't have to believe in this ooh 30 million killed and so on, in order for it to excuse the obscene amount of violence it takes just to keep our current capitalist system going *scratches nose*"

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (12.98 KB, 480x360)

Joshua Morales
Joshua Morales

Marx wasn’t against co-ops and I’m not a utopian socialist

Nathan Wilson
Nathan Wilson

The word "vaginas" makes me think of Zizek saying it.

Zachary Gray
Zachary Gray

Here's Wolff on how Peterson pussied out of the debate: youtu.be/qoHjX2vQgbQ?t=185

Brody Hughes
Brody Hughes

Ah, I hadn’t seen his response. Thanks for posting

Eli Watson
Eli Watson

Cryptofash vs cryptofash
pass

Aaron Martinez
Aaron Martinez

Zizek is fascist

Where are your proofz you faggot?

Parker Bailey
Parker Bailey

go to bed bakunin

Angel Harris
Angel Harris

10/10

Attached: 1444342295844.jpg (34.11 KB, 472x329)

Adrian Reyes
Adrian Reyes

Another migrant from r/Socialism?

Lucas Wood
Lucas Wood

This is going to be a trainwreck no matter who wins.

Jaxson Thompson
Jaxson Thompson

Probably CTH at this point, yikesing faggots.

Justin Nguyen
Justin Nguyen

I like zizek, he sees the truth of all things, but doesn't know what to make of it.

Christian Kelly
Christian Kelly

PETERSON BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (438.92 KB, 640x424)
Attached: ClipboardImage.png (374.58 KB, 674x338)

Carson Adams
Carson Adams

you can't blow the fuck out that which has already been blown the fuck out, but doesn't realise it cause it's a mindless slave of ideology

Attached: rs-600x600-161206064342-600.the-walking-dead.zombie.ch.120516.jpg (67.17 KB, 700x700)

Jonathan Allen
Jonathan Allen

Attached: glowingbateman.jpg (4.33 KB, 225x225)

Ryder Bennett
Ryder Bennett

well that just means he just listens to Jordan Peterson. LibTard OWNED!

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (500.34 KB, 680x743)

Lucas Campbell
Lucas Campbell

Well, I cannot say that hes wrong…

Dylan Foster
Dylan Foster

inb4 twitter bot

Blake Taylor
Blake Taylor

Apologize.

Attached: B1952E77-AC9A-4729-A1C9-8A5C960B64C3.mp4 (1.25 MB, 480x360)

Xavier Carter
Xavier Carter

Wew. If you didn’t watch the video, you didn’t miss much. It’s astounding that this man calls himself an academic.

muh 100 gorillions
saying you’re a Marxist but not a Stalinist is like saying that you’re a Nazi but not a Hitlerite
the left critique of the Soviet Union is just “if I was personally in charge I would have done better”
communists are lead by compassion and are “for the poor”
actually if you make $32,000 you’re in the global 1%, so everyone who lives in the West is actually a part of the 1%

I figure most people know why the first points are bullshit, but I wanted to point punt why the last one is bullshit as well. First, roughly 10%, give or take, of the world population lives in the “West”. It is mathematically impossible for everyone in the West to be a part of the global 1%. Second, roughly half of American workers (the world’s third most populous country and thus the largest contributor to the “Western” population) make less than what he assumes all Westerners make.
ssa.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2017
He’s an out-of-touch “academic” that assumes everyone else is as well off as he is.

Sebastian Hernandez
Sebastian Hernandez

Anyone else remember a time when "debate" actually meant two sites providing evidence in favor of their argument in an attempt to better learn other points of view and weed out facts from fallacies and not today where it pretty much now means "Two guys flexing on eachother to prove themselves the more "intellectual" and "win" "?

Attached: 1411465797956.jpg (13.55 KB, 164x251)

John Cooper
John Cooper

I feel like if people understood the socratic method and how to use it political dialogue would advance much faster.

Jaxon Butler
Jaxon Butler

It was never what you described.

Debates that actually meant anything have always been this sort of shit. It’s not about “learning from the other side” or any other idealist nonsense, but as a way of spreading your politics and consequently your power base.

Adrian Howard
Adrian Howard

You describe debate as essentially two sides trying to discredit each other. I disagree that it was always like that. People don't learn anything in those kinds of debates and both sides end up feeling shitty afterwards either because their "victory" was shallow at best or because they are the losing side

Michael Morris
Michael Morris

it reminds me of some proverb i heard ages ago that went like, "when you discuss, you teach yourself, when you argue you teach the opponent, when you debate, you teach an audience" no one has ever entered a public debate and left with a different opinion, it has always been done to showcase your side against the opponent, not to prove your side is better to the opponent, but to showcase that your side is better to the audience

Austin Fisher
Austin Fisher

I hate proverbs, "wisdom", and so on and so on

Attached: tmp.jpg (55.39 KB, 1280x720)

Michael Morgan
Michael Morgan

Any time, any place. But not a few weeks ago when I was in Europe and it would've been pretty convenient for us to debate.
Can Zizek even travel with his health problems?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1019.77 KB, 1280x720)

Parker James
Parker James

Peterson is a self-help psychologist who became notorious through online lectures with edgy viewpoints about women. He's a liberal who "has nothing to do with the alt-right" (in the same way Sargon of Akkad "is left-wing"). He also gives McCarthyism tier lectures about Marxism that showcast he hasn't even read the wiki entry on Marx.
Zizek is a meme philosopher who draws from Marx, Hegel and Lacan among others. He makes good points sometimes and is entertaining, but at other times his analysis can barely be called coherent or materialist. Would destroy Peterson in a debate though.
Wolff is a Marxist economist who has brought out several good books and lectures, but also holds some dumb views on 20th century socialism that are (rightfully) unpopular here.

John Nguyen
John Nguyen

no health problems youtube.com/watch?v=Yn-Vf1-1hrU

Luis Ward
Luis Ward

What 'dumb' view does the Wolff hold regarding 20th Century Socialism in your opinion?

Owen Williams
Owen Williams

What are some of Wolff's dumb views on 20th century socialism? If I can trouble you. I only just started digging into Wolff's videos a few days ago and have not fully acquainted myself with all his viewpoints.

Adam Campbell
Adam Campbell

tfw he was at my uni and it didn't get crashed

Jacob Bennett
Jacob Bennett

Something I think more people need to understand about Peterson is that above literally all else, however much you want to attribute his positions to grift or opportunism, his anti-communism is genuinely held, he's been doing the McCarthyist tier bullshit literally since the 90's, basically since his career in Academia started. I also think that most of the discourse surrounding Peterson approaches it incorrectly, which doesn't surprise me since most people opposed to him are doing it from the other side of a culture war but he genuinely is only dangerous insofar as policymakers, wonks etc identify him as politically useful to capital, which has been increasingly happening over the past few years but the most concerning thing would be his presence at one of those Bilderburg style global conferences recently, although idr exactly which one it was, but he was apparently an invited speaker there. Essentially, all of his Culture War bullshit hasn't mattered until very recently because now the Ruling Class is taking notes.

Brayden Cook
Brayden Cook

good Points, would like to receive more information about said conference.

regarding Peterson: i cant get too upset about him. he's capitalist through and through, he hates whatever he thinks is "Marxism" and i doubt his economical understanding is worth anything.

he basically justifies capitalistic order by being the best system we could achieve.

he's straight forward about it though and actually states that he believes life should be about being contempt rather than being happy. basically justifying any system for as long as there is no revolution because there being no revolution could be seen as people in a sufficient number are contempt

the more i write, the more i think he is a shill. partly enjoying his thoughts anyway tho

Cooper Lee
Cooper Lee

usually I don't correct people when they make spelling mistakes, but "content" and "contempt" are two very different words

Ethan Mitchell
Ethan Mitchell

He claimed that it failed on multiple occasions. Also made statements about muh repression, muh 1000 gorillion, etc

Dominic Butler
Dominic Butler

I want them to debate Christianity tbh, political discussion would lead nowhere.

Wyatt Bailey
Wyatt Bailey

Agreed. If zizek is subbed out for hedges.

Sebastian Campbell
Sebastian Campbell

oh shit

Jason Morales
Jason Morales

I don't think there's separating politics and christianity for Zizek anyway. I just want someone who understands psychoanalysis to explain why Jung was a clown.

Owen Turner
Owen Turner

It did fail on multiple occasions. The USSR and friends made many great achievements but ultimately they succumbed to capitalist restoration. Characterizing that as anything other than a failure in the grand scheme of things is pure delusion.

Anthony Jenkins
Anthony Jenkins

It was the Trilateral Commission, I remembered it not long after I posted, apparently he not only was a speaker but he was allegedly "wined & dined" so he certainly mingled beyond his timeslot. A lot of the far-right has actually been the group to pick up on this, unsurprising I guess since they have their Globalism Boogeyman, which to be fair, in this case isn't /wrong/, just a misdiagnosis of what the political power players of Capital get up to. What you're saying is all true; that's exactly why they're interested in him as a mouthpiece, he's absolutely a shill, you can look into which agency represents him and the various moves & PR stunts he's pulled with them and who else they represent (some of it's even in this thread). I don't think Peterson has a single problem with being bought off because his entire Patreonbux model is based on him doing something that likely already requires him to compromise his beliefs, why deal with smaller Patrons when you can have a few rich ones and see more success as a result?

Jackson Flores
Jackson Flores

you are right, autocorrect on mobile tricked me here in making me mistake one for the other, apologies

but then, there have to be more people in contempt for the system rather than being content

Alexander Hernandez
Alexander Hernandez

Attached: 634C247E-6B5D-4B88-8B2E-BC28A15E029C.jpeg (95.1 KB, 822x1024)

Cameron Bennett
Cameron Bennett

Zizek will throw Peterson off by telling off colour jokes, like the one about the African with the prehensile penis.

Attached: c794ea4044789db630910d6f78a3491230c8b3bd34b5d384f0326c8d06800310.jpg (115.37 KB, 617x960)

Cooper Hernandez
Cooper Hernandez

Political dialogue is a quagmire of bullshit because that's what it is intended to be. It's been sabotaged deliberately by the ruling class through think tanks, TV news, and so on. If you refuse to talk seriously and just shout at people you disagree with, you can keep them from having a serious argument too. Both sides have to agree to be serious.

Isaiah Harris
Isaiah Harris

(checked)
Why, yes. Peterson does seem to take his appearances very seriously, while Big Z likes to put in humorous anecdotes and jokes. Naturally a debate or some other lecture tends to be a more serious environment, but Zizek appears to have a less assburger more chill, viewer-friendly and reasonable approach, from what little I've seen.

Captcha: gFasOg

Attached: oj7.png (276.29 KB, 355x500)

Hunter Scott
Hunter Scott

Kermit isn't an assburger. He comes off that way because he's being dishonest and the mental resources that goomg toward social awareness are fully occupied with keeping the lies straight. Same shit you typically see with bad liars.

Sebastian Hughes
Sebastian Hughes

:^)

Attached: 2pawvn.jpg (84.55 KB, 697x500)

Joshua Nguyen
Joshua Nguyen

If this happens its going to be one of those situations where people who like zizek will say he won, and people who like peterson will say he won.
This might also propel zizek into the mainstream intellectual stratosphere and make him more popular with normies. who know peterson, but then will see this absurd sniff man, and look up his videos and thoughts some more

Attached: zizickphilo.jpg (56.29 KB, 460x449)

Julian Gutierrez
Julian Gutierrez

Going just by that pic, now is vastly better than then. The top quote is really just a tautology worded artfully to sound deep. The bottom quote is making a salient point about how interpretation works and grounding it in a context that is readily relatable.

Ian Adams
Ian Adams

He's looking good these days.

Elijah Watson
Elijah Watson

i dont think zizik actually said that, its just parodying him to make fun of him

James Davis
James Davis

They both will agree that Jews are epic.

Ayden Russell
Ayden Russell

Wisdomcucks think anything pithy is deep

Jaxon Peterson
Jaxon Peterson

He said it. It's from the Pervert's Guide to Ideology.

Alexander Sanders
Alexander Sanders

This one's especially bad though. It doesn't even rise to the level of sophistry because there's not even a fake argument being made.
Wise men know things and fools don't
No shit that's what the words mean.

Daniel Butler
Daniel Butler

jordan peterson vs zizek vs dugin vs kaczynski (accompanied by armed guard

moderated by: joe rogan

brought to you by: square space

Julian Bailey
Julian Bailey

nobody would understand Dugin

Ayden Garcia
Ayden Garcia

not including nick land

Josiah Jones
Josiah Jones

Honestly I just want to see Rogan and Zizek in the same room.

Adam Taylor
Adam Taylor

Wise aphorisms are the biggest bullshit, Žižek is completely correct.

Gavin Myers
Gavin Myers

Dave Rubin should be co-host.
Really this should become a week-long symposium on the dark arts. Then we can invite even more guests. Paul Cockshott, Richard D. Wolff, Jason Unruhe, Richard Spencer, Steve Bannon, Camille Paglia, Rafiq from RevLeft, Carl Benjamin, and Stephan Molyneux. Live reporting can be done by a media team composed of Chapo, Cumtown, Douglas Lain, Michael Brooks, Jimmy Dore, Ethan Klein and the one and only Keemstar. Celebrity appearances: JonTron and PewDiePie.

Isaac Morales
Isaac Morales

This but unironically. It would expose a shitload of people to left wing ideas.

Isaiah Butler
Isaiah Butler

Didn't he already chicken out of a debate with Richard Wolff after he couldn't squeeze enough money out of the university they were supposed to speak at?

Hunter Wright
Hunter Wright

I claim none of them and at the same time all of them
duuude, what a salient point about how interpretation works and like, grounding it in a context that is readily relatable, righteous brah
how the first was so poignant in regards to you, thats life

Liam Gray
Liam Gray

What about Jim Profit as another guest? His anti-moderators ideas may resonate with many now that facebook, yt, twitter etc are deplatforming a lot of people.
And Varoufakis.
And then there should be this Italian guy, his name is Diego Fusaro. Basically, he claims to be an anti-capitalist and "an independent follower of Marx" or something like that, but the points he makes on cultural and social issues are extremely similar to those of the muh Karltural Margzizm crowd. I don't know if he's fluent in English, though. Also, he criticised the Shniffman quite heavily in the past. But he would defend the USSR.

Attached: muh-cultural-marxism.jpg (193.58 KB, 1266x546)

Gavin Cook
Gavin Cook

There isn't an actual debate of idea. There is flexing, propagandizing, and ideology.

Kaczynski would be vindicated looking at todays social credit system and automated surveillance dictating people's behavior.

Jaxson Butler
Jaxson Butler

*sniff*

Thish weel b intradeshting

Xavier Wood
Xavier Wood

🅱eterson has accepted an invitation once only to back out later. He'll do it again. The reactionary fears the dialogue.

Blake Ross
Blake Ross

Kaczynski would just scream how he's been proven right the entire time
Dugin would waste his entire speaking slot talking about Transhuman demons trying to destroy Christendom or some shit or some other Ruskie Alex Jones tier shit

He would also variate between siding with Peterson and Zizek
He would call Zizek a Jew for being a Marxist but would flip his shit when Peterson insulted daddy joe and muh 20 million

Blake Morris
Blake Morris

Don't forget Finnish Bolshevik, Stimmekoreas, KI Deutschland, DemSoc01, Muke, and Adolf Stalin

Parker Murphy
Parker Murphy

titoism isn't marxist in the fucking slightest. how do you read Marx and not want to abolish markets and currency after he wrote an 800 page book advocating and proving the necessity of just that?

Gabriel Stewart
Gabriel Stewart

writes 800 page book advocating abolition of markets and currency
but in reality all attempts at abolishing markets and currency have failed, including in even nominally socialist states like the USSR which still retained currency and black markets

gee it's almost like the book was…wrong?

Carson James
Carson James

there were no attempts made.

Dominic Clark
Dominic Clark

2759115
if something failed in the past it can never succeed in the future

Jayden Russell
Jayden Russell

if I say bracket a pointed statement with "duuuuude" and "braaahhh" it becomes vacuous
Gee no wonder you thought that first quote was profound :^)

Cameron Morales
Cameron Morales

Corbyn is an Iranian collaborator
twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/958113185914998784

Corbyn is an antisemite
twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1074314203501088774

Attached: corbyn-iran.jpg (137.47 KB, 642x713)

Kevin Rogers
Kevin Rogers

What's interesting is the number of his fans that are critiquing him for this.

Camden Reyes
Camden Reyes

I see those kickbacks are going to good use.

Carter Howard
Carter Howard

well here's an interesting infograph from that thread

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (195.12 KB, 863x953)

Oliver Powell
Oliver Powell

Centrists are believers in the status quo and democracy is one means to change said status quo. It's why they shit their pants over political violence so much.

Nicholas Fisher
Nicholas Fisher

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (496.86 KB, 640x454)

Wyatt Gutierrez
Wyatt Gutierrez

now the NAZBOL GANG will finally come for peterstein

Attached: 1495763195523.png (2.92 MB, 2040x1452)

Joshua Perez
Joshua Perez

it's ironic for us Americans though considering they all told everyone to vote Hilldawg and then suddenly actually pretended to care about democracy when she won the popular vote

Jayden Perez
Jayden Perez

Don't forget the only hacking of the election - the Democrat primaries, and their subsequent blaming of the Bernard Brothers in their downfall.

Julian Johnson
Julian Johnson

Perfect

Bentley Mitchell
Bentley Mitchell

Netherlands
Voelt kanker slecht oetz

Attached: 19c2bc3c4e7160ff0f16446ef05268d0.png (302.74 KB, 594x416)

Brody Sanchez
Brody Sanchez

lmao youtube.com/watch?v=1WMcmRWzBjs&t=0m09s

Bentley White
Bentley White

that can happen if you talk with your friend/other academics in the same area of expertise, not on anything on media/public display, since literally forever.

Carson Jones
Carson Jones

pretty funny, while searching your quote the only result I got was a website that copy all Zig Forums content and apparently index it on google
zigforums.com/thread/2757537/right-politics/happening-peterson-says-he-would-debate-zizek.html

Brayden Allen
Brayden Allen

newfag

Anthony Nguyen
Anthony Nguyen

I see hollaforums has evolved.

Nathaniel Young
Nathaniel Young

Attached: yt4hXhJ.png (94.29 KB, 585x278)

Mason Rodriguez
Mason Rodriguez

slate.com/human-interest/2018/12/jordan-peterson-slavoj-zizek-fight.html

Attached: we-cool.png (442.24 KB, 866x675)

Dylan Russell
Dylan Russell

this article gave me centrism

Thomas Torres
Thomas Torres

i hope zizek refrains from doing this insincere, dumb piece of crap peterson a favor by debating him.
peterson only deserves to be ignored.

Jace Martin
Jace Martin

Is it any small wonder it is linked via Peterson's tweet?

Anthony Young
Anthony Young

yeah but it would introduce a lot of his followers to Zizek. That's not such a bad thing.

Thomas Campbell
Thomas Campbell

doesn't Zizek hate debates? He knows they are a waste of time so why would he say yes to them?

Bentley Martin
Bentley Martin

Jewish Freudian inspired Jungian pseudoscience vs Jewish Freudian inspired lacanian pseudoscience
lol nty

Angel Walker
Angel Walker

but it would introduce a lot of his followers to Zizek
peterson's followers would not give a single fuck about what zizek says. they would applaude peterson and scream "zizek btfo, leftists btfo" in any case, even when peterson would drown in his own crap infront of them.

Jayden Wright
Jayden Wright

They're probably going to agree on more things than they disagree on.

Thomas Watson
Thomas Watson

Lacanian
Jungian
If anything, this will be one of their biggest hold-ups/disagreement and they will barely even get to politics.

Oliver Nguyen
Oliver Nguyen

muh jooz
Useful insight as always, idpol.

Brody White
Brody White

Interesting to see this study. I guess the point of contention is how do you gauge the ideology of the person.

Here is the counter-arguement though.
quillette.com/2018/06/01/centrists-really-hostile-democracy/

Jose Kelly
Jose Kelly

That'd be a dialectic, not a debate. You are a fool and you should lurk longer until your /pol/tard brain is cured.

Samuel Cook
Samuel Cook

My apologies, Dr. Zizek
what did Peterson mean by that though

Nathan Morales
Nathan Morales

I thought you retards love Jung because he was the only non-jewish follower of Freud

Joseph Allen
Joseph Allen

NO PLEASE GOD
DON'T LET PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE OVERTON WINDOW GET ANY ATTENTION
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Kind of amazing how transparent this shit is.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit