Black people loved Sanders more than any other candidate or race you faggot.
The Amerikkkan situation
Austin Carter
Kevin Thomas
keep telling yourself this
even if it is the case, there is still an underlying problem. This is the left's version of Russia hysteria. Refusal to accept criticism, blaming external factors rather than self-criticising
Nolan Johnson
It's true that non-whites prefer Sanders more than whites.
Based on the Wikileaks documents, the DNC was opposed to Sanders' candidacy and did what it could to stymie him in favor of Clinton. How much it truly impeded his candidacy versus other factors is a valid question, but the DNC did strongly oppose him.
Samuel Lee
They prefer not to waste time voting
Even if it is true, it doesn't address the underlying problem.
As slovene lacanian sniffman says, if a husband is suspicious that his wife is cheating, that jealousy can be psthological, regardless if she is not or really is cheating on him.
The easiest thing in the world is to be right. Even if you are technically right, you refuse to understand the underlying point, which you would be confronted with if you lived anywhere near non-white working class in the US
Alexander White
Non-whites aren't the same as blacks though, they also include other races. Idk if blacks like Sanders or not but that chart doesn't show it either way.
Jack Evans
How is that even relevant to the point you were trying to make about black people not supporting Sanders?
Prior to the documents, I personally didn't care, so it was hardly pathological. I didn't even support Sanders's candidacy at the time, since I regarded his "socialism" as a fraud (and still do). It's just objectively true that the DNC was opposed to his candidacy and did what it could to impede him.
Yes, it must be very hard for you, being wrong at every possible opportunity.
So now it's "I have no argument against this being true, but I disagree anyway."
The survey attached is clearer, but it's a different one, from around last year.
Dylan Gomez
this was my point, even if it is objectively true, there were still blind spots in the sanders campaign. You missed the point three times now
what a fucking melt. They don't vote …how is that relevant???
m-muh statistics
Hudson Ward
Your original assertion was:
Which isn't even true from all evidence. He's quite popular among black people. What little evidence there is for this involves liberal "think"-pieces decrying him for not addressing the "black community" from identitarians appointed by media organs as speakers for the racial identity. This is not objective evidence, nor is this even the sort of evidence one would care about as a communist.
You're saying "they don't vote," and it's true that they didn't insofar as the 2016 primaries are concerned, but there's no evidence that they were refraining from voting for Sanders specifically rather than simply refraining from voting at all, or not able to vote due to other impediments (inability to register to vote, difficulty voting generally, lack of name recognition, etc.). You've failed to distinguish any of those causes from what you're asserting. It isn't relevant until you demonstrate its relevance to the specific circumstances.
Insofar as you've made any concrete assertions, they haven't been true. It's the easiest thing in the world to make vague, insinuating assertions.
Brody Foster
OP outs himself as troll outsider by stumbling over the word-filter, gets called out by the first response, and still gets the thread going. Never change, Zig Forums
Justin Sanchez
It is though. According to Marxist doctrine all oppression stems from class oppression. Even Marxist Feminists believe this.