Karl Marx was redpilled on the jewish question

What truth is there in his argument? Marx’s essay, On the Jewish Question, originally published in 1844 contains the following:

What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.…. Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities…. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange…. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.

Marx argues that, “In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism.” Larry Ray explains, “Marx’s position is essentially an assimilationist one in which there is no room within emancipated humanity for Jews as a separate ethnic or cultural identity.” Dennis Fischman puts it, “Jews, Marx seems to be saying, can only become free when, as Jews, they no longer exist(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Attached: Karl-Marx-On-the-Jewish-Question.jpg (310x482, 70.98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/On The Jewish Question.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Bakunin was redpilled on Marxism being compatible with the interests of elite international Jewry

Judaism was pretty much always a religion built around banking, finance, and ethnic exclusivity. This predates Abrahamism all the way back to the Babylonians and their social status as a class of financiers.
Christianity was the ideological counter to this since it's built around viewing all men as equals, which is why Jesus was so popular among Roman plebs.

Read the PDF: marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/On The Jewish Question.pdf

First, take your meds.

Second, Bakunin was a brainlet with no theory.
t. former "Bakuninite" anarchist

I completely agree, throughout the thousands of years of history of the tribe they have always favored nepotism and usury to establish dominance in their host societies.

In his article, “The Russian Loan,” published in the New-York Daily Tribune on January 4, 1856 he wrote:

… the real work is done by the Jews, and can only be done by them, as they monopolize the machinery of the loanmongering mysteries by concentrating their energies upon the barter trade in securities… Here and there and everywhere that a little capital courts investment, there is ever one of these little Jews ready to make a little suggestion or place a little bit of a loan. The smartest highwayman in the Abruzzi is not better posted up about the locale of the hard cash in a traveler’s valise or pocket than those Jews about any loose capital in the hands of a trader… The language spoken smells strongly of Babel, and the perfume which otherwise pervades the place is by no means of a choice kind.

… Thus do these loans, which are a curse to the people, a ruin to the holders, and a danger to the governments, become a blessing to the houses of the children of Judah. This Jew organization of loan-mongers is as dangerous to the people as the aristocratic organization of landowners… The fortunes amassed by these loan-mongers are immense, but the wrongs and sufferings thus entailed on the people and the encouragement thus afforded to their oppressors still remain to be told.

I was never a Bakuninite, but like everyone who isn't retarded I always understood the synergies that exist between classical Marxism and international plutocracy.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Even Stirner didn't stoop that low.

Wasn't Marx a Jew?

Karl Marx was a baboon

he belonged to the ancient moor tribe

He had Jewish ancestry but his father had converted to Christianity to practice law IIRC

Attached: 4741748ebb1806827fbf7b16e3158df794c25bb7.png (1676x937, 1.76M)

Proudhon was literally Zig Forums tier

Full Bakunin quote:


This whole Jewish world, comprising a single exploiting sect, a kind of blood sucking people, a kind of organic destructive collective parasite, going beyond not only the frontiers of states, but of political opinion, this world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other… This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralisation of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.

baboon must live in the zoo but all warms will win

This is why Bakunin never got anywhere. Trying to fight capitalism, especially global capitalism, without a large government is a death sentence. It's like walking into an open gunfight without your gun assembled and hoping you'll be able to assemble it before you're shot. It's utopian and idealistic.

holy shit why is Bakunin such a strawmanming brainlet?
it’s Marx that was literally opposed to having a strong central bank, it’s why he attacked Proudhon in ‘’the Poverty of Philosophy’’ and wrote an 800 page proof on why banking and currency need to be abolished called ‘’Capital’’

The Jews are the bourgeoisie

Attached: pepe.jpg (684x676, 163.82K)

Reported.

Marx calls for: