I have, probably more than you. See and please let me know your reply. If you think that liberals in Connecticut suburbs making 150k a year are in the same material circumstances as trailer park residents barely getting 30k a year because they both have a boss, or if you think either are directly analogous to the industrial proletariat Marx was referring to, you are an idiot that thinks in memes instead of analysis. Saying that it is 99% percent middle class was just funposting banter, obviously there are poor and dispossessed people in New England. Behind the funposting my point that it's silly to claim New England as "the future of American socialism" because it has a very high GDP relative to the rest of the country and is politically dominated by mostly-satisfied liberals.
New England is the future of American Socialism
Parker Cox
Jose Perry
Yeah, the south has way better material conditions suited for the revolution. Either that or the Rust Belt. In New England, everything just seems tolerable. I mean, I know there is a huge heroin epidemic going on but from what I've seen the people in the South are way more oppressed economically.
Easton Allen
The South, Midwest, and Mid-Atlantic are all more probable centers for revolutionary activity to grow from. I wouldnt write off the West Coast or Southwest or New England but they seem much more unlikely.