Xi's article on dialectical materialism to be published

"BEIJING - An article by Xi Jinping on dialectical materialism will be published on Qiushi Journal, a flagship magazine of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee.

The article will appear in the first issue of the new version of the journal in 2019.

The Party should be constantly nourished by the wisdom of Marxism philosophy and apply dialectical materialism and methodology in order to realize the Chinese Dream of national rejuvenation, said the article by Xi, general secretary of the CPC Central Committee, Chinese president and chairman of the Central Military Commission.

He stressed adherence to formulating policies based on reality, proactively facing and resolving conflicts, enhancing skills to cope with complex situations and problems, and unceasingly promoting theoretical innovations."
chinadaily.com.cn/a/201901/02/WS5c2c1905a310d91214052045.html
I'll be curious to see how revisionist it is.

Attached: 5c2c1905a310d9126fdc76fe.jpeg (1199x1011, 394.17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rt.com/news/379406-china-billionaires-party-assembly/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I can’t wait to see you faggots quiver with awe when you realize that Xi’s work is pure orthodox Marxism, if not a higher stage. In twenty years you’ll be calling yourself a Marxist-Leninist-Xiist. People who doubt China are among the most short sighted on this planet

Xi is going to drop a redpill that the dialectic is in motion against capitalism

...

where?

Based and Dengpilled

Read the article you dumb nigger

Will there be an official english translation?

We could ask them? Could spur them on to translating it.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (731x374, 33.28K)

Attached: I want to Believe.png (600x750, 400.42K)

This but unironically.

Baizuo scum, including nu-Zig Forums, squirming to find left-sounding ""arguments"" against based Xi Jinping Thought without sounding
like the right wing anti-communists they actually are will be the shitposting bonanza of 2019.

I'll be happy if it's actually good. I've read Xi's book though, and it didn't have much Marxism in it.

Nice trips, but the governance of China was a shitty book and market socialism has no theoretical foundation in Marxism, and Xi was a princeling.

I want to believe tho

lfmao

Based and revisionpilled.

Hail comrade Xi

Xi Jinping is rumored to regularly write anonymous articles, and they are deep and antiliberal/reformist

Trips for truth

Hopefully it explains why China can't afford even the barest of succdem reforms to ease the suffering of the working class while they develop the means of production.

jesus confirms boys

Back to Reddit

Back to /liberty/

A dictatorship of the proletariat is the working class organized as a new state, not whatever liberal garbage you think it is. The Chinese Communist Party is in control of the commanding heights of the economy. I hope this board is up in 2050 when I can laugh when I watch you faggots pretend that you supported China all along as it transforms into a society distributing based on need and the capitalist world continues to implode. The sun is rising in the east, and it began with Deng

XI IS HERBERT MORRISON GANG

Attached: HM.jpg (869x1122, 159.61K)

Anti-china shills on suicide watch

...

No, a DOTP is a transition state from capitalism to socialism where the state is under control of the working class.

That doesn’t make it a DOTP unless the CCP is a party of the working class.
rt.com/news/379406-china-billionaires-party-assembly/

The state has ownership of the strategic sectors of the economy, the state is under the control of a worker's party. They have ownership of the MoP

A workers' party which is full of Billionaire members of the bourgeoisie? Lenin is rolling in Moscow at that you fucking revisionist.

go back to fagotslavia. whoops you can't.

Keep posting capitalist shill sources. The Chinese Communist Party, with nearly ninety million members, is as close to a workers' party that you can get.

Go talk to Ismail on /marx/

Except the party is controlled by literal porkies, not workers. Many of the high ranking officials are billionaires, Xi himself is worth hundreds of millions.
In order for you to believe this you would have to reject Marxism altogether. Commodity production underpins China’s entire economy, even the SOE’s. As such it operates according to the logic of capital, which means maximizing exploitation and bourgeois dictatorship. There is nothing socialist about China in the slightest.

...

How does the workers exercise power over the CPC?
Why are trade unions being broken up?
Why are marxist students disappearing?
If you think they give a shit about the working man, you've fallen for the propaganda.

Trade unions can be reactionary
Ultra-leftist CIA funded Maoists, you mean? They're wreckers
Same way as in the USSR

His family does, and you’re conveniently ignoring the rest of my post.

The ones in China aren’t. They’re fighting against capitalist exploitation, shit working conditions, and poor wages.
Prove that they’re funded by the CIA.
In other words, they don’t. Except at least in the USSR the state wasn’t compelled by capitalist logic and bourgeois interests and actually worked in the public interest to a large degree. China doesn’t even have the bare minimum of socdem policies like public healthcare.

lol

Is it really that hard to conceive that the CIA would fund a group that wishes to undermine the currently ascendant China? They're saboteurs plain and simple. The CIA funded plenty of people during the Cold War who shilled for honeyed words promising "worker control" in order to undermine the Eastern Bloc

Health care and education do not need to be provided by the government in order for a government to be socialist.

A socialist society requires that goods and services be produced for use, not as commodities. You can’t seriously suggest a society that doesn’t even provide basic necessities without extracting profits is socialist. Literally no actually socialist country has ever had private healthcare.
t. Engels

HURR THE USSR WASN'T SOCIALIST

Socialism is an economic system. Economic systems are defined by their relations to the means of production.
A country can be called socialist when socialism is the dominant mode of production. That is the case in China, where there's also a large capitalist sector subordinate to the socialist state.

It was though, because it didn’t produce commodities. Production was use-oriented.
How is that the case in China? Most of their economy is private, and even SOE’s generate profits, and thus extract surplus labour from workers. Private property, markets, and wage labour ALL exist in China and dominate the economy.

today i learned imperialist countries exploiting cheap labour is actually good so long as the government of the poor country has a red flag.

that's a strawman of a theory i could actually semi-seriously push, but it would break with orthodox "muh imperialism" whining since it leads neatly into a plan to help develop african countries by having them grow loads of cheap food while pushing western farmers to the dole. the trading relationship may be reformist and exploitative, but it's better than passively ignoring while stealing raw resources.

Yes, and not only in China. There's a long history of cia/gladio/whatever run "maoist" organizations.

It's another thread where w*Sternoid scum cope with the fact that they screwed the humanity. You stupid w*Sternoids helped to destroy the only country that could build communism (USSR of course). Now that you see how fucked things really are, you like to imagine that there is still hope in China. It's too late you retards. Only barbarism nao.

You am*Ricanoid scum, the gubermint is a tool of the ruling class. In a developed capitalism gubermint bureaucracy is indistinguishable from porkies. You am*Ricanoid scum don't understand that people want to seize mop in order to achieve specific consequences (abolish exploitation, better labour allocation and sho on). Overexploited workers who regularly commit suicide is not one of the consequences

To conclude, all w*Sternoid scum can go kill themselves

China is not imperialist.

Westerners are the worst.

It can happen in socialism, like in China

Commanding heights was a term used by the British labour party in 1945 to describe their version of socialism: was Britain from 1945-1951 socialist?

The “commanding heights” being state owned doesn’t make them socialist retard. China’s SOE’s are capitalist, they produce for profit and exploit workers through wage slavery. Socialism isn’t just when the government does stuff.

Lenin was the originator of that term, dumb nigger

Yeah and he used it to describe the NEP, which he also admitted was state capitalism, not socialism.

I don't care, it was still used by the labour party to describe its policies which it implemented, was Britain from 1945-1951 socialist?

I unironicaly can't wait to read this!

yes

Attached: kek.jpg (736x552, 37.45K)

Cuba could do it. Why not China?

If the working class is in control, why haven't they eased their own suffering? Surely if they are the basis of the state then they would use that power to make their own lives easier? Or are you claiming that they are unfeeling bugmen who are perfectly content sacrificing their health and happiness and even their very lives to grow the economy?

It sounds like a noble sacrifice to me. I’d be happy to die knowing that capitalism crumbles with every drop of sweat off my brow

...

Happily installing suicide nets around your factories to keep the workers from taking the easy way out instead of toiling to defeat capitalism by
*checks notes*
producing surplus value for foreign corporations.

China is the victim of imperialism in my post, silly.

broke: socialism is the real movement which abolishes the present state of things - marx
joke: socialism is worker ownership of the means of production - Zig Forums
woke: socialism is what a labour government does - Herbert Morrison

The Chinese government and ruling class is complacent in the imperialist exploitation of their own people, while at the same time engaging in their own imperialism abroad.

The problem is when organizing without permission and outside the structure of the party and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (中華全國總工會) it goes against the very point of advancing the cause of the working class said students are purportedly standing up for. Young students should join the party and work to help the working class through existing party structures.

remove KMT

Come now, post war Labour was pretty based but it was no socialism

Attached: 1543424047693.png (943x639, 548.09K)

Yeah and leftists in America should join the Democratic Party and shill for minor, incremental reforms while Wall Street robs workers blind lmao. The CCP is not a worker’s party.

GANNNNNNGGGG

Attached: HM.jpg (869x1122, 159.61K)

Yes it is. And yes, if there were any leftist in the US they should join one of the two parties. Oh no, you are right. They should establish independent gropus 6 person strong and influencing 10s of people.

groups*

It should have been in the next 5 year plan. But because labour is trade unionist and auccdem they halted at the brink of doing it. The eternal succdems.

Well it was less that and that Labour didn't win a stable majority at the 1950 elections: if they had Attlee was on the verge of actually introducing effective central planning for the commanding heights of the economy. If that had occured and then Bevan had taken over, unironically Britain could have been DemSoc in the 1950s.
Alas the eternal Tory took over and ruined the best chance in history (until now) to build a Jerusalem.

This thread makes me wonder if these western leftoid dengists are paid shills or not. You kids oughta move to China, after all they're socialist right? And their economy is booming and will surpass the US in a few years, all while being lead by a workers' state! Isn't this amazing? Socialism (and soon to be communism) was in front of us all along.

nice argument boomer, lets completely ignore shit like family, jobs, cost of moving, adapting to a new culture and lifestyle, potentially having to learn a whole new language, etc.

because Naxalites and New People's Army, people who have been fighting revisionism for fifty fucking years, are shortsighted. Neck yourself.

I was making a comparison dumbass, of course I didn't edit it.

if they did ppl would say succdem isn't socialism

you literally can't win with anti-communists

Still waiting for the article on dialectical materialism in Qiushi Journal…

You know, this actually makes sense
For all the shit Zig Forumsyps cry when they go on about MUH Family and MUH CLAN
They in fact none of that, they don't have any unity with anyone, except for likeminded autists, so they will harp on about how you can uproot your life like that and move somewhere else.

Designer handbags for all rice farmers.