Have you ever noticed how much stormfag s hate pit bulls?

It’s really fucking weird. They compare hem to black people and then proceed to call anyone who likes them degenerates.

Attached: 01CDBDBA-FF29-49C7-B33A-988334D1ECDE.jpeg (680x289, 44.95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emirate_of_Sicily
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Perhaps the comparison has to do with blacks being more violent than whites, akin to pitbulls being more hostile than most breeds? idk

De fukk? Since when? I thought pit bulls were the nazi dog of choice.. Mby they threw them out with the bomber jackets and GetaGrips.

What's the nazi "in" dog atm then?

That was when Neo-Nazis were just white thugs with a theme. Now they're a political force again so they rebranded heavily. New fascist dogs of choice would probably be German Shepherds, Golden Retrievers, etc. Dogs with a sort of working nobility associated with them.

pitbulls are the sweetest dogs when they aren't raised by drug dealers

Just as I thought then.

Kinda "funny" coz of the selective breeding that fucks the poor dogs up (thinking of german shepherds with extremely sloped back and wobbly legs). Mby they should take a few pointers from that.

Yeah I noticed anyone with an anti-pit bull profile thingy on Spybook is a Nazi/WN/Alt-Rightist. It's how they "signal" to each other.

The "PitBull problem" was a forced meme that failed which was being pushed by the Aut-Right which served as a gotcha where they would basically lay out how violent Pitbulls can be and then once got the person they were serving it to to agree to that suddenly go to "Well how are Muh Niggos any different den? XD"

It dropped off the map pretty quickly because of it being ineffective

Thank you for making my day.

Attached: oops.gif (578x578, 93.39K)

I hate dogs in general. Stupid creatures. Pitbulls were littrrly bred to kill. They would throw them in pits and force them to fight each other like pokemon.

Attached: the kot of 2018.png (544x572, 224.2K)

They're still smarter than cats.

Unironically nah.

I mean, they're loving dogs. But they're jealous dogs and they can still tear you tf up even by accident.

You know what's hilarious? The whole pit bull thing was started by Zig Forums as a false flag psyop to push the overton window towards racism by using pitbulls as a standby for black people. But as Zig Forums usually does, they eventually fell for their own psyop and unironically whipped themselves into a boomer-tier moral panic over a dog breed.

Ironically the most dangerous breed is not pitbulls, it's labrador retrievers, and they sometimes use labs as the "white people" to pitbull niggers

Attached: 9d0cbd5fefc544d12c4b4b814f1d2a3990e1f4f74cbbde267163a534cc90c1c3.gif (341x321, 1.99M)

To all the pitbull haters in this thread: ur moms gay
I've had too many discussions with dishonest crypto fascists about pitbulls to do it again, I'm going to tear my eyes out if I have to read another "It's just dog nature man".

What about pitbull halfbreeds

As someone whose worked with animals for a living, I can honestly say I was less concerned about getting bitten by a pitbull than a chihuahua. Like yeah, if pitbull bites you they'll do a lot more damage, but most seemed to have pretty chill attitudes (toward people, towards other dogs…not so much). Chihuahuas are nervous little fucking wrecks and can go from being fine to trying to bite your fingers off in a second. They can't do life threatening damage damage, but they can break the skin and it fucking hurts. No one reports an attack by a chihuahua or a yorkie to the police, but everyone would report a pitbull.

Attached: communism dog.png (700x600, 499.63K)

The whole analogy is retarded since dogs were teleological/selectively bred by humans for thousands of years to achieve certain desired traits while humans face natural selective evolutionary process like every other species. This accelerated mutation of course leads to very distinct genetic diversity. Maybe if black people were under chattel slavery for a really long time and bred for very specific features, you can make the argument that blacks are completely distinct from whites.

Also the genetic diversity of Africans is far higher than other regions. They are like the mutts of dog breeds, with everyone being less diverse and genetically weaker. This literally means Africans are least likely to suffer some issues caused by inbreeding and more likely to be immune/resistant to any widespread pandemic. (RIP Polynesians and South Americans).

This. Fuck Canines! Pet Wars Now!

pitbulls were originally bred to hold bulls down as they were being branded and then were later on bred to be fighting dogs. their massive jaws reflect this. they may not be anymore aggressive or territorial than other dogs, or perhaps they are it honestly doesn't matter, the issue with pitbulls is their inbred pattern of clamping down when biting and not letting go.

I've personally never met a pitbull owner who want a total piece of shit to a man, they're always owned by niggers, spics and white trash reggaton listening wiggers

Wut
are you saying labrador retrievers have killed mone people than Pit Bulls?

Ebinnnn xD

Don't know about fatal bites but Labrador Retrievers are responsible for most dog attacks. They just don't fit into the narrative because they look mild-tempered and not scary, but still attack people because of shitty upbringing.

fatalities are the point you chucklefuck. who cares if labradors nibble at you. shit bulls lead the way when it comes to actual fatalities. that's the entire point.

Attached: redpilldogs.jpg (540x202, 38.15K)

truly aryan

what would be our based dog? a mutt?

Attached: 0820-soviet-space-dogs.jpg (900x600, 65.9K)

this thread is retarded
pit bulls were bred for killling, don't give me any of this 'dont hate the breed' shit you fucking apologists. the world would be better off if the breed was subject to mandatory sterilization.

saying labs are worse than pits in this regard is un-fucking real

know what started the anti-pitbull sentiment? pitbulls repeatedly eating their neighbors children, you fuckwits

some kind of scrappy working dog imo

Attached: border collie.jpg (700x700, 27.2K)

Idk, my dealer has two pitbulls, and they're fucking amazing dogs. I mean, the older one could fuck you up if you tried some shit with his owner, but he's a really sweet and well-behaved dog. The younger one is a bit worse behaved because she's a puppy, but she's really friendly.

I would be EXTREMELY surprised if either of them attacked a human unprovoked.

Pitbulls are for lumpenproletariats.

Attached: Pitbull Fun.webm (222x400, 1.91M)

yes you and everyone else who says it's not the breed

Fuck off dog fascist

...

All living things deserve rights

Attached: 1542595816875.png (872x632, 170.07K)

"The victim's neighbour, Maria Gonzales, said after hearing that the beloved family pet had killed the nine year old"

…including people and other animals who get killed by poorly-trained pits

i don't think we need to kill off a breed of dogs, but i'm not under the delusion that everybody is capable of handling dangerous or exotic animals either

Yeah, a lot of people own pets, or even specific dog breeds, that they really shouldn't. If you're gonna be a shitty pitbull owner, that can really fuck the dog up and make it aggressive. Doesn't mean that you can throw an entire breed under the bus and label them as "aggressive" and "killers" when responsible owners exist.

Stop pushing this agenda.

hurr durpaasdlkjsf;l;

Who are you quoting?

fair enough

they're not inherently violent per se but clearly not everybody can handle owning one

That's adorable

You mean the lumpenproletariats are for the pitbull 's tummy

Attached: images.jpeg (292x173, 7.85K)

Zig Forums sees imaginary blacks, Jews, communists and whatever other boogeyman they're noided about this week around every corner. They're obsessed. You kind show them a cylindrical dark object without them interpreting it as symbolic of black penis.

It's also retarded that they hate pitbulls so much but also hate gun control (rightly). Despite the fact that what they propose basically amounts to dog control.

The lab thing is true but it's not the full picture. They're pretty sweet, but that trait has been memed into an overblown reputation where people think they could never ever attack anyone. End result of this is you get a lot of shitty owners who get them, don't exercise them, treat them like shit, and then act surprised when doggo snaps. This is a far cry from pitbulls which are *known* to be dangerous and still rival them for attack rates.
It's like how you're more likely to be killed by a falling vending machine than a shark, but that doesn't mean the shark is somehow inherently less dangerous.

Does that mean my retriever/collie cross is nazbol?

It does tho.

Sharks are statistically harmless and would only ever really target a human if they were starving or confused it for a different animal.

There's that word again, after I explained why statistics aren't necessarily the best metric for threat analysis.

Attached: eye roll.gif (325x281, 1.16M)

There's only 16 deaths a year. We can't sterilize the sharks over that.

mah nigga

Attached: border-collie-wallpapers-25405-502619.jpg (1920x1200, 301.72K)

If a "sweet and harmless" dog randomly decides to kill a baby, it was never sweet and harmless. Plenty of people are just shit pet owners. As it is, there is no empirical evidence that the BIG SCARY dog breeds are naturally aggressive; in reality, it's the little terrier kinds of dogs that seem to be more likely to misbehave, and even then the evidence is only statistical.
What is actually happening is that when a Rottweiler or APBT or similar dog is mistreated, it poses more of a threat to people because it's bred to be more physically powerful than other breeds. Piss off a toy dog and, assuming it isn't rabid, you'll probably just get a few stitches.

I have a lab mixed with a border collie.
Great dogs

I don't like pit bulls either, tbh.
Not because of fun or anything, but because the dogs are usually really energetic and annoying, and the owners will never shut up about how great pit bulls are because they know they have a bad reputation.

Cats are the superior communist pet because you always interact with them on equal terms. To a cat you are just a weird creature that lives in their territory and gifts them with food. Dogs are utterly subservient to you, as well as emotionally dependent. It is not something any socialist should enjoy.

Natsoc here, border collies are great dogs.
To answer ops question, I believe the pit bull thing was a way to prove that race exists and matters, which is obvious to anyone.

Killing small humans is unironically good praxis for non-human animals.

How? You may be able to take them, sure, but when you do the rest of them will inevitably find and kill you.

Because good praxis is what's good collectively, not individually.

If your species gets a reputation for doing that shit they'll all get killed.

...

But they haven't all been killed at all. In fact, they do have this reputation, and instead of being genocided, they are euthanized instead of kept for months in squalid prisons and banned from cramped apartments where they would live miserable, unhappy lives.
It also gives a cover to other breeds that can kill with impunity.
If every dog took one human with it, the dogs would win.

Comparing human races to dog breeds is a good way of indicating that you know jack shit about biology, even setting aside the political connotations.

Attached: IMG_20181206_161528.jpg (600x600, 97.61K)

There's clearly some combination of environment and genetics that makes blacks more violent. Same could be said for any trait in a given population. Why would 100% environmental determinism EVER be your null hypothesis?

Zig Forums is an antisemitic shithole full of retards and feds. Be better. Have intelligent conversations about the interplay between race, genetics and crime rather than being immediately dismissive.

As in, because dog breeds are products of artificial, not natural, selection. Purebred dogs are literally inbred, and this inbreeding is the source of their most common health complications.
Dunning-Krueger is a hell of a drug.

Attached: d2c99d36df8f31faeb8f1578704e081754f89cd7acb49d6b465d98cc41d5d200.jpg (324x299, 22.28K)

Define white please.

The people you replied to didn't even compare races to dog breeds. Your snarky reply was irrelevant, retarded, and didn't invalidate race in any way.

This is why the right thinks we're race a bunch of biology-denying cucks who support open borders and fun. Fuck off to /r/politics useless retard.

Are you a rape baby?

Of European descent, for modern purposes. At this point that's enough to bind us.

There are a lot of black Europeans

That this trait even exists is where the fallacy lies. In at least the United States, where racial studies of this sort are done, crime rates have been rapidly declining since the early nineties, and has no correlation whatsoever with demographic changes.
Have the scary nigger crime genes been magically disappearing? If so, our Jewish multicultural overlords have been doing a bang up job. :^)
It's not. The idea that leftist politics require tabula rasa is nothing but a burger myth, one frequently perpetuated by its own liberal hacks, because they were too retarded to grasp that "Harrison Bergeron" was satirical. If anything, it's a tenant of laissez-faire capitalist theory (i.e. homo economicus).

What else did he mean by this, then?
They will always think that, whether or not it is true. Creationism and hard racialism are a false dichotomy.

Not an argument.

who else would raise a dog like that?

My sister is a clinical psychologist and has a pit.

So Euro-Turks are White since their famlies have lived in Europe since the 1400s? When's the cut off?
Magyar esti and Finnish DNA is pretty much Central Asian and they migrated to Europe seperate after the Indo-Europeans
Southern Italians / Spanish etc have plenty of Northern African / Moor "Blood" in them
And what about Bosnian Moslems / Albanians / Chechens etc? They all hail from Europe but we know what most of the "Race Realists" stance on Islam so are they just disqualified?

where the fuck did she get her degree? UC Berkeley. I bet she is from SF and supports bums shitting in the street too.

How cliche

Attached: smug 045834098534.png (864x931, 1.01M)

No one supports except deluded UberLibs
The correct solution for homelessness is to make them not homeless anymore

you're comparing living creatures to pokemon? Literally*

What do you have against UCB :DDDDD
since you seem like a very rational and stable person

sounds like you have a bit of a complex or something idk

Yeah, she's not Picasso or Georgia O'Keeffe. Not sure what you were expecting. I'm happy enough that she's on the Democrat Cops of America train, because that's more than I would expect.

Oh yea? You mean make them get a J.O.B.? Or just give them everything for free?

Why do you hate white people Zig Forums?

I only like people who pull their weight in society. A.K.A. NOT homeless people or illegal immigrants.

I get what you're saying, but in my experience the race realists aren't puritans. The "X aren't white" thing is just a meme.

Oh you know. the very stable and realistic enviroment they're trying to creat :D

They really are just americans. Race is a political construct meant to exclude and otherize people to justify their exploitation. There are some european ones but their attempts at selling a pan-atlantic "white" identity have so far failed to catch on because the bourg of europe don't need it (right now at least.)

Attached: benjamin franklin white.jpg (850x400, 71.27K)

most homeless people were regular members of society who tore their lives apart with hard drug use or even just some exacerbated mental disorder.

so i have a sound mind and they don't so i should pay for them? Don't stick a needle in your arm and drugs wont make you homeless.

Ebig