Capitalists always side with each other against communis-

They were part of the British Empire at the time IIRC.

Faggot

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Taranto

nytimes.com/2004/04/18/weekinreview/the-world-early-warnings-what-did-he-know-and-when.html

'no'

What I have to say as an outsider is that Democrats have been the most slick and efficient imperialists in US politics, Republicans end up eating away at the very foundations of American hegemony with their sheer reactionary stupidity.

They actually reinforced the Manchurian front immensely after the defeat of Khalkhin Gol, and there was a significant voice in Japanese planning for placating the West while linking up with Germany and the Soviet Union.

The foreseeable post war situations Roosevelt Roosevelt and Churchill had to take as they coordinated the succession from UK to US led global imperalism were the following 2
1. 'Reconstructed' fascists restored in the anticommunist bloc after the war against a battered USSR
2. Asia industrialising under fascist rule, thus a new pole of imperialist capital that would probably win in the next imperialist conflict.

Very ironically, they chose 1 and we finally got 2, but in the middle we got the Golden Age of Capitalism, so it's not all that bad, is it.

against the Soviet Union, sorry