Let us discuss! Please be reasonable

Shit taste

Attached: soviets.jpg (494x333, 51.34K)

Also, anyone can discuss this topic without taking any position. You don't need to be a pedo or a radical anti-pedo in order to discuss what will be the reality of future societies.

Not really.
Defining consent and responsibility in terms of intelligence, which would also need a way to measure intelligence accurately. A really dumb adult is as manipulative as a child, you don't magically turn smart one day after turning 18, it doesn't really make all that much sense.
Still, there must be a general way to prevent people from taking advantage, just like I'm sure there are 16 yo teens out there that drive better than I do, however that's not enough as a general rule.

So, you would need such an advanced society that abstract concepts like "age" and "maturity" no longer exist, and that my dear will probably never happen.

In conclusion, kill yourself pedo.

14 is as low as it goes in Europe
And that honestly makes sense since children haven't reached the peak of the cognitive development until the ages of 14-15 (By peak I mean the necessary structures to continue their development)
But we also have to take in mind that the frontal lobe develops fully much later in our teenage years and that is when our self control mechanisms mostly kick in.

Under the age of 14 and you get the bullet though.

almost all girls will have bleed by this time, they will be ready to save the white race. (yes, white, because brown, black, yellow already do it)

Never happen? Why? I think this is a very anti-materialistic way of thinking, since you're bounding something almost implying that there is something like human nature, and that transformations of social relations can't occur. They do, and society might as well morph to such a result even though it is pretty unlikely. I understand that you said probably, but it still a pretty deterministic view.

Also, the fact that a thing like "mental age" exist will make it more likely, not the other way around, since it blurs the distinction between actual age and behaviour.

Not really relevant. The discussion is, a priori, about what could impact us enough to consider a pedo-normalization. Are you implying that humanity will take what you described as a necessary condition? Because I think that this consideration by their part is very unlikely.

But Zig Forums you are not white, why do you care about whites so much, baboon poster found a black girl for himself, I am sure you too can find some sort of mystery meat creature that will love you.

This is why consent ages are stupid, sexual abuse should be determined on a case by case basis, there's no reason to draw a line at an arbitrary age and say everything above is good and everything below is bad. It protects people who abuse 16 year olds and ruins lives of people who had sex with a 15 year old from Grindr who had barely any contact before and none after.

He said she's Palestinian/Indonesian. I wonder what she looks like.

Yes, it is actually very anti-scientific since reality is not deterministic.

...

Just because society advances, it doesn't mean that it will adopt some fetish/taboo. We used to let child work in factories and we don't do it anymore, in that sense society advanced to let the kids have a protected status, alcohol and cigarettes are not sold to them anymore either. We can put in jail abusing parents. Kids are very sensible and things that happen in their age will likely shape who they are in life, kids with traumas usually keep them for life. It's not as simple as you're shaping it to be, and that probably says a lot about about *your* mental age.

Most of us know how these threads go. Eventually, no matter the premise, as long as it's pedo related, it will devolve into "Why don't socialists support the pedos?" and the answer is always "It's terrible politics" and then they wheel out the old memes and call everyone heggin spooged.

It is, that's how the Law works. It also uses some guide lines that helps the judge decide what punishment should the offender receive. How old are you, man? Do you know how reality works?

There was a statistic from some dating app on this. Yes, it is not unlikely for a woman much younger to date someone 10 years her senior for example, but it's mostly men that actively seek women younger than them. Men 30+ will almost always choose a chick in her 20s regardless of his age.

That is not what I implied at all. I pointed out some signs of how society would normalize it. The central point, I would say, is the fact that society is becoming more and more open to sexuality and minors are already starting a sexual life. Some relations between adults and teens are already happening and normal.

Also, I never said it was simple. Indeed, I opposed the deterministic view. You're attacking a strawman and just being sassy by the fact that you have no relevant thing to say, it seems.

Preying on the retarded gets the bullet too.
At what point is when a retarded person is so impaired that his "consent" is not consensual. It's pretty sad for someone to love a retarded person for what they are and have to live in the fear of prosecution, but it doesn't matter because societal norms am I right?

This one will not.

This doesn't exactly contradict the possibility, right? It could be the case that this normalization would come from nowadays manifestation of male-driven sexuality.

Minors always had a sexual life, user. Ask your nan-nan. You don't hear so much about it in the past because people didn't have leftypol to shitpost on back then, and also sex was stigmatized. But sex definitely did happen, even adult-teenage relationships, since women were encouraged to marry as soon as possible.

No, it is a manifestation of moronic cultural leftovers and perhaps a bit of small dick syndrome on some men's part. I'm a man myself and don't see the point of preying on vulnerable teenagers.

I think the correct stance to take is to be against predatory relationships without discrimination of ethnicity, political affiliation, Sex, disability, physical characteristics, and age.
That said social norms are still going to stigmatize certain relationships. For example it was taboo to marry a black man even though it was legal.

They always had sexual life, we are animals after all. This doesn't mean anything. As the other user pointed out, people used to marry childs and we moved AWAY from that. Society being sexually open is different from it changing the concepts of consent and age.

But it nowadays case is greater.

Not what I see. It's really common for chads to go for really young ages. A more accurate and scientific answer for what already happens is the biological development that implies that those girls are ready to provide offspring.

Put me in the screenshot, Zig Forums

How does this come into play when it revolves around sex for pleasure and not procreation?

We moved away from the social institutions and constructions that would dictate value, but we certainly didn't move away from the practices, which is what is actually relevant.

There's no way to prove that. I think that with sexual education and contraception people are more self-conscious, in my experience.

Lol, you're giving off real incel vibes. Not to mention that if you're a Chad, supposedly the purpose is to fuck women, not have kids with them.

Lol of course.

schizophrenia

Because they're not disjoint. Sex for pleasure is related with biological traits that are deeply connected with procreation. Of course I'm not saying that such a thing would encapsulate the answer, but instead would give as a brief hint about the subject.

Read .

hahahahahaHHahahahha

Obviously, yes.

100% serious here: either full communism, or full feudalism.

Attached: 146586811715461966.jpg (1280x852, 324K)

Yeah sure my man.

We are actually one of the only animal specie that has sex for pleasure lol. We do it because it feels good and we are rational enough to figure out that it can work without spawning children. Idiot.

The simple problem is that people don't want their kids getting coerced/banged by some random older weirdo.

This isn't a problem of social conditioning, it's a problem of abuse and humans will always find that shit nasty af.

I think the UK's age of consent at 16 is fine. And even then the girls that age are fucking retarded and really not intellectually 'mature'.