Only on the larger question like Israel, or where it would directly impact the district/state in question. On the smaller questions there's little choice presented (if there is even a "choice" to present). The Qatari embassy probably has a greater impact on US foreign policy than any population center with ~100,000
True, which in turn influences the electorate itself, as lobbies present/frame the issue to the electorate.
Mass immigration is a symptom of imperialism and capitalism, its inherent to the system. It will always be in the interest of the bourgeoisie of the largest capitalist powers at the time to impede and/or control the development of minor capitalist or socialist powers and to crush any threat to their hegemony, which in turn creates a desperate populace seeking to flee the instability and poverty of their current countries and move to the currently more economically stable ones. The "weaker" civilizations are actively prevented from becoming developed because allowing such would impede in global resource extraction and labor explotation.
Mass immigration did not occur in the USSR or most Marxist-Leninist countries because their focus was developing the productive forces of the countries they were in, not breaking those forces down or securing the markets and forces of those countries for the profit of a singular capitalist one. For example, the USSR had multiple previously underdeveloped countries within it, many of them retaining a Muslim majority. For someone like you, those people should have flocked to Russia and it's neighbors because that is what occurs in a capitalist economy in regards to undeveloped counties as well as "weaker" races and religions. But for the most part those people stayed in their respective countries because they were satisfied with where they lived, and they were satisfied due to the USSR providing both economic and military security to them, building up their productive forces, and allowing them to obtain a properly sufficient state of livelihood unseen by those countries inhabitants before.
Capitalism doesn't reward those who work hard in the slightest. For example, you could invest all of your effort in doing your job as well as you can, as hard as you can in a minimum wage job and you would still receive a minimum wage till you die while someone who made a lucky investment or who owns a company (in which he'll most likely hire management teams and planners to run) would make millions monthly (Compare this to a system like a piece-rate system like that under Stalin in which you receive pay based only on the work you yourself actually complete). Capitalism rewards those who are willing to do whatever it takes to make a profit, even if those action impede the progress of the society at large. It cares of nothing else, and on contrary to what you state, incentivizes competitors to engage in whatever activity is deemed necessary to outcompete their competitors even if that activity may be deemed by society to be illegal or "immoral".
This is the interest of every capitalist. Why would you ever allow others to ever come close to standing on your level when doing so would reduce your own profits and add "unneeded" competition for them? In regards to their own economic self interest, it's nonsensical to allow any further competition in their sector to exist and it stands to reason that they would use whatever means is open and deemed necessary to prevent such a thing from occuring, means such as buying out any existing startups, using "bully" tactics and threats of force, and/or using the government.
Lmao mods are removing posts that don’t agree with their worldview ITT
Literally the only one I can find on the ban list is the one claiming that Zig Forums does not hate minorities more then Jews. Your actual "arguments" are still here. Make actual arguments now.
Zig Forums hates Jews more than anything you gigantic retard. Zig Forums views Jews as what bring minorities into their lands and who encourage race-mixing propaganda, diversity, and multiculturalism.
After the Synagogue shooting by Robert Bowers, Zig Forums celebrated it because they viewed it as attacking the root cause of the problem, Jews, with many of them saying that without Jews they wouldn’t have things such as diversity and multiculturalism if Jews did not exist. I remember many of them saying that if “every white man went out and killed six Jews we wouldn’t have the problems we do today”
Zig Forums views the Jews as the supreme enemy who is responsible for bringing minorities into their lands and hates them more because of it. In fact, I have seen Zig Forums praise the actions of people such as George Lincoln Rockwell who allied with black nationalists in order to destroy the Jews.
And yet Zig Forums will back pro-zionist candidates and will willfully turn a blind eye to Zionist actions and Mossad operations that directly benefit nationalist groups. When I was on Zig Forums I saw anons praising Orban in Hungery and Le Pen in France, despite both of their history with, and support by, Zionists. And let's not even go down the road of discussing MAGAfags who lap down whatever repackaged Neocon shlock that laid down before them. Before I left I even saw anons praising Israel as an example of a proper ethnostate that should continue to exist as a buffer to the inbred mudslimes to the east and that there are "Good Zionists" and "Bad Zionists", the "Good" ones being the ones who hate muzzies and stay in Israel and the "Bad" Zionists being thsoe who want open borders and live abroad. The synagogue shooting was filled more with people worrying about optics then anything else and the fact that your telling me that anons now praise George Lincoln Rockwell is simply informative of how far the standards of Zig Forums have fallen.
That's just the ideological failings of the Right. Ask Zig Forums Zionist Trump or Zionist Hillery they'll go with Trump every single time.
But they're anti-immigration and opposed to the EU. Zig Forums wouldn't give a shit about Israel or genocides in Palestine or Neo-colonization if they were guaranteed muh white countries but because there's some immigration they can scapegoat Jews as the ultimate causation of everything wrong ever. Fact is if that was the case they'll support Israel killing Arabs and evil far left Muslim,Kartual marxists like Assad and Gaddafi or straight up recolonization of Africa under European powers.
Their just magatards not the autistic fascists,ancaps and all sorted white nationalists. If Trump said we're kicking out all Blacks and Hispanics and all Jews are going to Israel but they get to genocide the shit out of everything around Israel and the West becomes a right wing a Ethno-state every one from a fascist to a ancap would be 100% behind him and would be celebrating as millions of Arabs are killed and that just shows how ideological poor the right wing and their ""critiques"" on Jews are. Since it all comes down to the idea that Jews are on some near hivemind level of thinking and you could trace the amount of Jews to Communism since their biologically programmed to hate white people or some bullshit.
That's just the Right wing realizing it wouldn't mind being what Israel is. Anyway you still get retards with the whole "there are no good Jews" stuff. Try have a talk about Communism and you'll get a bucket load of people who will call Lenin and Marx Zionists and evil deeply triggering and problematic Jews despite not practicing Judaism and in the case of Lenin not even knowing he was Jewish and I'm pretty sure Lenin would of passed under Nazi racial laws
They've always praised him, he's a American fascist who's lesser known then literally Hitler, no doubt some of them think of optics so they keep Hitler under a few rocks and parade the based and redpilled but not associated with Genocide American home grown Fascist.
Zig Forums still thinks Jews are the ultimate cause of bad shit but they quite literally think if you either killed all Jews or put them all in Israel and didn't allow them any connections to other countries the world would be perfect.
Ummm…
Read the statistics. China had a famine with 45 million deaths in the 19th century. When it was capitalist. That's higher than even the highest estimates of deaths due to starvation under Mao.
Now I'm no Maoist, but communist regime, pseudo or otherwise, has starved as many people as capitalism has.
So Anglos are the worlds most inferior race then?
...