Are Worker Cooperatives Actually Socialist?

A system of cooperatives is not "socialist" unless it changes the relations of production away from what currently exist under capitalism. This means ending production for market exchange, pricing systems, wages etc. in addition to common ownership of the means of production. The end result being a system where workers freely associate and produce to satisfy the needs and desires of themselves and their communities, not to facilitate the expansion of capital.

IMO cooperatives are a progressive step forward within capitalism, and should be promoted to introduce ideas of economic democracy and alternatives to capitalist value production into the public consciousness. However, without some way of planning and networking co-ops together they can only reproduce capitalist social relations, albeit in a "nicer" fashion.

read rosa

read a 90 page pamphlet which mentions co-ops for about a paragraph that sure debunks them

didn't know the Russian revolution took place in the 18th century.

lmao

Attached: dastardly whites and their servile 'muskets'.jpg (2592x1936, 690.53K)

You couldnt make this shit up. This is why no one takes leftists seriously

They didn't have tanks, planes, helicopters, drones, tomahawk missiles, nuclear weapons… Yes, a rifle that can only hold 5 rounds, with a receiver that needs to be manually cycled after every shot is a 'little more than musket'.