Not really, it's not a feeling of wishing to act more mature, it really feels like i'm wasting my time. Of course, so does most entertainment, so i can't really explain it.
You better read this shit
Ironically, Anglo countries are mainly the only places where adulthood = moving out. Before the 1940s, people didn't "move out." They may get a place of their own, but it's usually in close proximity of family. In fact, people moved out only to pursue careers to get money to contribute to the family estate. It's no winder why England and America are most depressed nations in the west. People move hundreds of miles away from home, stuck in a dead end job in bumfuck, Egypt to pursue the "American dream", find a mediocre partner and have mediocre kids and yet be expected to take care of your elderly parents on the other side of the country.
America especially sees marriage and parenthood as mandatory rites of adulthood. If you're under 30 and you're single and childless, you're a "super-adolescent", over 30, you're a "creep."
I'm mexican and i will probably stay in my grandparents house after they die tbh
that doesn't really sound like america to me. nobody gives a shit if you have kids or are married. maybe you're thinking of japan, india or the westboro baptist church.
You'd be surprised. Especially among (American) conservatives,marriage is "the foundation of society."
Go on sone of these Christian politics websites. They actually think that women who don't have kids are literal witches and are prone to premature health problems. They also think that marriage makes men "more masculine", therefore young men who are single are "immature beta males".
Do you want a fascist dystopia? Because that's how you get a fascist dystopia.
Shitting on the solutions to a country's problems because you REALLY hate critical thinking and empathy is how you end up in a nightmare scenario.
what the fuck are you trying to say?
The more institutions like Fox News, the Republican Party, the "Heritage" Foundation, etc. shit on socialist policies, the more likely it is for a fascist dictatorship to arise since too many unsolved social problems causes people to turn to violence / authoritarianism as a means to bring back stability and order.
Basically, America is shooting itself in the foot by doing this.
first that retarded report, now this
theyre running out of arguments, aren't they
Socialism is very outdated and wouldn't work in a system where an optimal global condition of markets is trying to be reached. Outsourcing and collaboration between countries that technology enabled creates less inequality over time as wealth gets transferred from first world countries to developing countries putting a halt to imperialism.
Naturally the means of production can be rather called memes of production. 70% of the economy now lies in services rather than production. It's irrelevant if the workers own the means of production, the workers simply wouldn't be smart and efficient enough to know what to do with it which would lead to societal decline and poses great opportunities for leaders or dictators to take charge.
Why would a worker deserve to own means of production or even means of a service if he didn't contribute anything to the development and innovation of that service or production? Current workers also share no responsibility whether the production or service is great or terrible, they won't face the consequences except maybe a lay off where they will get paid by the government anyway. Any socialist policy would be tyrannical for the worker does not desire autonomy nor freedom to innovate and create its own product. Therefore the worker will obviously transfer that freedom, responsibility and autonomy to one who is making good use of those. This optimizes markets on micro level but also on macro level. Socialism wouldn't give a worker an incentive or even a possibility to grow upwards and instead it would just be motivated to stay as complicit and docile as possible to whoever the power got transferred to, to manage the socialist utopia.