LIBERALS GET THE BULLET FIRST

First, a bunch of people voted for Trump here for "accelerationist" reasons. It was literally the third most popular option, right behind not voting at all and throwing your vote to a third party. Second, the user who said
was making the point that you would vote for someone who would engage in similar actions to Trump behind the scenes, just as long as that person didn't make it obvious to you.

Oh he did, just in other countries mostly. And I make that point and focus on imperialism because, you know, part of my focus is on the ==INTERNATIONAL PROLETARIAT== of the world. You know, the thing that is part of me being a Marxist.

Attached: 4cd511f895b7ec318e5246888b76f20bd90d7861074af27243ded18016031e24.jpeg (500x750, 63.05K)

not inherently liberal
not inherently liberal
What are you a fascist?
scottlively.net/tps/
u gay

The greentext strawman is getting old. You're not even responding to me in good faith. According to your logic, an administration that can implement a single payer healthcare system in America is indistinguishable from one that spreads race hate propaganda.

I think both you and are illiterate.
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1920/lwc/ch07.htm
Let me highlight this:
The singular greatest leftist revolutionary in history accurately identifies the issue that projects onto me
This is in fact precisely what you are saying- unless the capitalist system is totally overturned I have no reason to support candidates that are trying to work within the capitalist framework for the benefit of the oppressed. Lenin titled his work aptly, you do indeed have an infantile disorder.

But Obama spread race hate propaganda.

Marx and Lenin were talking about getting actual communists into power and not neo-liberal capitalists.

lel, did you read anything past the title?

Source?

Not through democratic means.

The entire work. Would you care to read the chapter I posted? Nice sage btw, I have been owned.

Shit man, I don't know, him standing in front of a camera telling America a 6'2 criminal could have been his son and the rise of idpol that has decisively split relations among the races and set much of america against the working class whites as a scapegoat for the ills passed down by porky is good evidence.
Basically his entire two terms are your source for race hate propaganda.

He's talking about communists participating in elections, and voting communists into power, not liberals. "Parliamentarianism" is a position on whether a communist party should participate in elections, and he's criticizing communist parties that refuse to participate in elections as candidates; he is not advocating participation in elections by voting for liberals.
"Utilise parliamentary elections and the parliamentary rostrum in a revolutionary and communist manner" doesn't mean "vote for liberals."

You sound like a huge moron, although I'm pretty sure you're just trolling at this point.

Youre still one of those loaf brains that calls anyone you dont like a liberal.