Gay Luxury Communism

What is Zig Forums's honest opinion on LGBT people?
Are they victims of alienation, product of neo-liberalism or just normal people?

Attached: 1551891164862.jpg (753x1200, 358.24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxistleftreview.org/articles/foucaults-history-of-sexuality-a-marxist-engagement/
libcom.org/files/Anti-Oedipus.pdf
libcom.org/files/Caliban and the Witch.pdf
reuters.com/article/idUSN06395397
reuters.com/article/us-cuba-lgbt-church/communist-ruled-cuba-hosts-first-transgender-mass-idUSKBN1830EZ?il=0
nytimes.com/2013/03/16/world/americas/a-transgender-elected-official-reflects-an-evolving-cuba.html
lmddgtfy.net/?q=Harry Hay NAMBLA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Also please post gay USSR pics
I-I-It's for self-amusement hehehe

Who gives a fuck, obsession over what turns people on is liberal

Trans is nonsense IMO. It would only be real if there were definitively 'male' and 'female' states of mind, which there aren't. Biological sex is the only meaningful measure of whether someone is male or female.

L, G and B seem normal ,they also appear in nature
Transfolk may say some very stupid shit about having a different soul, but dressing like a different gender doesn’t hurt anyone
Any other special sexuality does not deserve a name and asexual suck
In general who fucking cares

Attached: 32d20.png (1440x1080, 1.11M)

The horrors of capitalism combined with the various drugs capitalist pharmaceutical companies push on everyone creates an unstable mind in many, opening them up to deep influence by the capitalist identity politics campaign to give people an alternative explanation for the sufferings they instinctually realize they are suffering. The rise in lgbt, particularly the unorthodox kind (new made up genders and body mutilation, though i believe the frequency of traditional gays is also inflated by this) are the result of people trying to deal with the suffering they feel by becoming a thing that is allowed to suffer under modern liberal society.

how could you say that?!?! you deserve to die nao… kill yourself terf!!!!1111

Gays and asexuals are OK, don't give a shit about them
Trans are shit, imaginary stuff, overall stupidity and fun. You are born of your gender, accept that fact.
coming from ancom

they just want a different body, like a body builder, but with sex instead, maybe because of a disorder but who knows

who is the one in the middle on that pic?

The problem for me at least is the way in which they view and propagate a hyper-feminized view of women. It's unhealthy for everyone involved imho.

Trans, gays, asexuals, pansexuals, bi people, whatever. The only people who honestly care about this kind of self-expression are the type of people who haven't shaken off their dumb reactionary attitudes.

Seems Polish…..

LGBT people are normal. They've always been around. It's only recently that demands are being made for fair treatment with the rest of society and porky is more than willing to oblige as a distraction from class issues. Under present-day socialism, it would be a non-issue considering its inherently socially progressive nature.

Attached: 9b0e253558bb638f035b3602e4b67d232aad6261ee5331f0590f8720501195e2.png (376x455, 177.9K)

Just normal.
Also all the anti-lgbt idpol on this ""anti-idpol"" board really makes you think

Sinners whose lifestyles should not be encouraged.

the two genders

This isnt really the fault of Trans people though. Almost always trans women that don't present femininley are mocked and seen as "not putting in the effort", whereas trans women who do present femininley are seen as propagating unhealthy gender stereotypes.
Same applies for trans men, it's a damned if you do damned if you don't situation.

This is the best answer that there could possibly be in this thread.

Can someone post that pic of Brezhnev and Honecker getting homo with each other?

ok so how about we don't have trans at all then because its inherently contradictory and snowflake identity that is purposely meant to propagate social disorder and anxiety

I'm 7 foot tall, 400 lb, and 10% body fat. If you disagree with this, you're a horrible reactionary bigot who deserves to be shot, and should be excluded from any left-wing spaces.

If a man wants to dress as a woman, sure that's fine. In certain circumstances, crossdressing has been used to insult and demean woman, but crossdressing isn't inherently sexist, and has a history within gay communities.

But this doesn't change the fact that they are a man. In general, they are born with a penis, have testosterone, have been raised as a man, etc. Dressing like a girl doesn't MAKE you a girl.

A comparable analogy would be some scrawny guy who wanted to be a body builder, who requires you to pretend that he is in great shape, otherwise you are literally committing violence towards him.

To what end? Sorry conspiracies aren't worth arguing with.
did the jews do it? The Frankfurt school?

Pretending they are another gender is the only current treatment we have for them to live a nice healthy life, otherwise gender dysphoria fucks them up.

Friendly reminder being anti trans is idpol and anti-science. It's not the job of random idiots on an image board to prove to you trans people are real, it's the scientific consensus. If you think your galaxy brained enough to disprove it, then please do.

A lot of the time, it seems to be some COINTELPRO shit. I'm not saying its a conspiracy, but trans issues, which effect such a small portion of the population, dominate so much of the discussion in left-wing places. Additionally, any position on gender that doesn't mesh with the dogma of "TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN," which is pure idealism and incompatible with a materialist analysis of gender necessary to approach oppression based upon sex and gender, are met with screams of "TERF!!!!!!!" and exclusion from left-wing organizations. This is, by definition, discord. I don't think they themselves are aware of this, but people are heavily pushing the trans lobby, which can damage cohesion in leftist spaces.

what did that have to do with my post mate

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (640x632, 488.3K)

If you mean that gender dysphoria exists, then obviously, nobody disputes that. But if you mean that transwomen are women and transmen are men, how can there possibly be a scientific consensus in favour of that? It's literally feels>reals.

That i can agree with you, thought i think it's more likely the left is demoralized on America, COINTELPRO has used identity politics before and there's Operation Earnest Voice so i wouldn't discard that option. I mean look at shit like #metoo, it started as a movement for middle class/poor women to talk about sexual harassment and then it was appropiated by fucking hollywood stars.

This. The western obsession with essentializing gender and sexuality has got to end. The very concept of sexual orientation is just pure liberalism.

very bad false flag

Transexualism is part of an overwhelming set of unnatural cultural ideals forced by the Jewish bourgeois who realize that socialism can only exist in a Traditionalist ethnostate. The left will never succeed until it stops attempting to force homosexuality and miscegenation onto the working people.

wrong socialist got fucked in south america by interventions there weren't any faggots there, Che killed them in fact

Why definitive? There is heuristic, scientific evidence that there really are different brain patterns for males and females. There's also the fact that HRT helps get rid of dysphoria, while it doesn't get rid of, EG, schizophrenic delusions of being transgender.

anti-scientific propaganda

Underrated post

Attached: 97e5f895c9a84ab8882e1758e61656f3e68f6dd4045323692ffe22ab01e47ed6.jpg (553x579, 39.52K)

And where do the feels come from? Magic? The soul? No, actually, dysphoria has a material basis. So the question is what is the material basis. It's not schizophrenia. Somehow, it's treated by HRT, which suggests that their brains really do respond favorably to female hormone levels. There is scientific evidence that the brain is not magically exempt from sexual dimorphism. THINK for a moment, how fucking crazy it would be if males and females have subtle and not-so-subtle differences in all other parts of their body, but not their brains. THINK about other animals– they CLEARLY have sexual dimorphism in their brains. Yet somehow humans are totally exempt? There is a plain scientific explanation for dysphoria, and it's that it's literally just people with opposite-sex brains.


You're the people taking the gender and sex idealists at their word. There's evidence to suggest trans people really do just have opposite-sex brains. Where's your evidence against?

...

What exactly is controversial about my statement?

Attached: 1549634913753.png (526x690, 265.33K)

Its not just "wanting" a different body, its claiming that they HAVE a different body (in the body building example), and that everyone who doesn't go along with it is a horrible person.

Man and woman isn't simply defined by physical appearance. It is possible for a man to look extremely feminine, or a woman to look extremely masculine. It is possible for a man to want to look like a woman, and for a woman to want to look like a man. Trans people want the body of the other sex, and want people to CONSIDER them the other sex as well.This is thought control. It is considered transphobic for a straight man to not want to sleep with a biological male because they are a biological male, or for a lesbian to exclusively want to sleep with biological females.

The fact that you false flag as a Christian while denying the official Biblical as well as church stance on the issue, calling LGBT "socially progressive", and demanding an end to the "essentializing" of gender.

No it's not you absolute dunce. Some lunatics do demand that everyone address male-presenting trans folk as women or whatever, but the overwhelming consensus is that they ARE in opposite-sexed bodies from the sex that they feel they are.

Weird but not in conflict with my worldview. Potential allies or enemies

I don't know how it could be proven that it's their brains responding to the HRT. The physical changes produced by the hormones, and the pure placebo effect, undoubtedly have a psychological impact.

Of course there are mental traits associated with masculinity and femininity, but these are not definitive of the genders. Being attracted to women is a typically masculine trait but that doesn't mean that gay men aren't men. Autism is a very masculine trait but some women have it too.

You know as a person that struggled with the idea that they are in the wrong body and shit and doesn't know a lot about science and everything, my first thought is; its an illness. And illness need cures. Now the so called "transition" would relegate me to a life of exclusion and discrimination, struggling with social relationships, enormous spendings. I'll never transition, it would just make my life shittier; in fact Id gladly swallow pills that make my brain not funny, so i can finally live in peace in my current, not-hormonally-altered body. But these pills do not exist and will never exist under capitalism because it is NOT PROFITABLE, trans people are too few of a percentage of people and buy a lot of shit to fix themselves if you dont cure them for real.
So, what does this blogpost amounts to? The thing that i'm explaining is that 1 its ok to "transition" or whatever, but its important to remember that transexuality is an illness because it makes your life shit 2 there is no place for trans rights fights in socialist politics. Now I am against discrimination, but basically by putting le acceptance meme in the same tier as the socialist revolution one is doing a disservice to trans people because obtaining socialism, the main goal, means getting mental cures. 3 anti trans people are like i dont know "anti depression" people holy fuck, whats even the point.
I'm actually for the withering away of a lot of gendered norms for the very far future, but right now its a dream, pragmatism is important.

there is tho

It isn't until recently that trans people have been brought into light, but they've always been around. The people who screech about respecting pronouns and forcing others to date them are SJWs that will (hopefully) grow out of their cringe phase.

There actually is a solid body of evidence of observable neurological differences in trannies, and most of the results have been replicated consistently. The liberal postmodern 500-genders bullshit is almost entirely unrelated to transgenderism from a psychiatric perspective; most "check your privilege" types have likely never experienced GD and only want an excuse to berate others in public without repercussions.
Trans identity politics are as garbage as the rest, but stigma against the mentally ill is a very real issue since most mentally ill people are not actually insane, and trying to normalize them has long since been proven ineffective.

Where in the Bible does it say that men must wear pants and that women must wear dresses and like the color pink?

You really think they don't test to deal with the placebo effect?

Stop talking about genders, I'm talking about the sexes. Sex is part of the material basis for gender.

John 13:34 Pasalm 9
You shall wear sweat pants so your dick print attracts all the horny females and girls musn't dislike the color of their tongues for it is a cool color for girls.

Attached: laughing shota.png (708x1000, 663.17K)

But that's not the same as showing that they have the brains of the opposite sex, whatever that means.


Prove that they do. How the fuck are you supposed to control for placebo effect when the real pills have a very noticeable effect on the body, and the placebo pills don't?

And how do you observe sex-differences in the brain except through gender?

no they go on HRT because they want to look like women so they'll get treated as women

nice dodge, but the only people who buy this are feminist indoctrinated morons

HRT helps even if nobody recognizes it.


The noticable effects of HRT aren't instantaneous, while the psychological effects work much sooner.

Brain scans. Receptivity to hormones. Plenty of other ways, some of which are mentioned here

"Girl" and "Boy" are ultimately semantics. You're using a different definition. Neither one of you are right.

This is pretty odd when you realize transgenderism is arguably more accepted in some countries with anti-Semitic governments (Iran).

people's obsessiveness over their self-image and arbitrary sexual preferences seems indicative to me like the whole thing is a mass coping mechanism & huge waste of time but i'm sympathetic to their struggles regardless

there are definitely more important things for marxists to discuss than silly fucking trans semantics. i don't know why we need to do this all day and on every website. it's not that important

Well if it was about hormones then how could someone have a gender that conflicted with their body and the hormones it was producing?


I'm going to need sources on these studies.

I mean, its great that that people are now more aware of these issues since now i dont have to fear for my life while walking in my hometown for being gay but we do have much more important things to discuss imo.

It doesn't matter why a person is gay, trans, autistic, or schizophrenic. Given the material conditions that an individuals genetic composition and body born and raised under neoliberal global capitalism that individual will always be what they are and it is a perfectly rational, normal expression of human existence. An anxiety attack is valid response to the trauma of living in late stage purgatory. Learning to cope and pretend that the source of your trauma doesn't exist so you can get back to work is not.

It only needs a "cure" if you believe the prevailing neoliberal ideology that the atomized individuals purpose is capitalist production and sexual reproduction of the worker under a cis-heteronormative-white-patriarchy. If you take this for granted any individual human that is not maximizing capital productivity is defective and labelled "ill", "disabled" etc. and must be altered to be a more productive worker.

Gay, Trans, and non-neurotypical, black, poc, women, etc individuals are not in fact essentially immutably ill, disabled, broken, violent, weak, emotional, aberrant or whatever negative descriptor you might use when evaluating the purpose, usefulness, contribution to society under neoliberal capitalism unless you are so wholly wrapped in ideology you cannot see it.

Read Marx, Foucault, Deleuze,

marxistleftreview.org/articles/foucaults-history-of-sexuality-a-marxist-engagement/

libcom.org/files/Anti-Oedipus.pdf

Read Federici
libcom.org/files/Caliban and the Witch.pdf

Neoliberalism is driven by the sacrifice of exceptions to the rule and individuals on the fringes take the full brunt of the callous indifference of capital. The most marginalized among us are the most important to the revolution and in fact the key to highlighting the contradictions of capitalism that others may have missed. These people tend to have the most skin in the game and are the ones physically directly materially effected first when policy changes. I find this tends to make them the most dedicated of comrades.

Attached: while-there-is-a-lower-class-i-am-in-it-while-there-is-a-criminal-element-i-am-of-it-and-while-there-is-a-soul-in-prison-i-am-not-free-97488.jpg (850x440, 45.88K)

That's a broad generalization. I'm trans, have many friends who are, who are very active socialists and don't have anything to do with identity politics, only class based struggles that will in the end break the systemic oppression of Capitalism. I personally don't like a majority of the trans community because they make everyone hate them even more instead of just trying to blend in like many of us want to. Its like they're trying to make a third gender for me me me attention. Nobody who isnt trans is ever going to understand it either, even I have no fucking clue.

Yeah most trans people you meet you will never notice because they "pass" (I don't know if that's the right word but I'm not trying to be prejudiced). I worked a retail job and we had at least one trans customer who no one in the store would ever necessarily notice was M-to-F. Eventually we got to know her some more, became friendly, and one time we teamed up to play a practical joke on the boss, like she'd go up to the boss, who'd be like "how can I help you ma'am" and then she'd drop her voice really low into a bass "I HAVE A QUESTION SIR."

Then all the other employees burst out laughing. That was fun. It was her idea too. Anyways it's not really a big deal.

I was going to add this was a regular customer who we got to know over a long period of time. The boss never figured it out which is why it was funny. She had a hunky, Army veteran husband too.

This thread alone is proof that LGBT "issues" are a divisive subject that suits porky nicely in dividing the left. I'm not going to say that LGBT issues are not an issue (especially outside the west), but we can simply see how effective a subject it is at distracting us from the goal of class warfare. Magnified and its easy to see how it has become such a useful distraction among the mainstream left.

Attached: 5c488be99fb484d94e4c38d5c51c66fa767cf79cffb15228ae9f542ddcdbfb69.jpg (804x802, 70.25K)

I just want to point out some thing Ismail mentioned regarding "issues" distracting us from class warfare by using a comparison in the old SLP of America:

This thread alone is proof that negroe "issues" are a divisive subject that suits porky nicely in dividing the left. I'm not going to say that negroe issues are not an issue (especially outside the south), but we can simply see how effective a subject it is at distracting us from the goal of class warfare. Magnified and its easy to see how it has become such a useful distraction among the mainstream left.

I don't want to say we should ignore the issue though. Just pointing out how easy it is to understand how the mainstream "left" has become distracted with social issues rather than class war and this thread somewhat proves it.

I think it is perfectly possible for the left to become divided in a good way: for the hard, class-based left to gain its own movement in America and for the civil rights/LBGT left to stay in its own thing. I think it will happen anyway when people realize what a shitshow the current left is.

Honestly I think the mainstream liberal left is blown up by the media and is way smaller than people think it is. All the gays I know IRL are comrades or apolitical but believe basic socialist principles while not knowing it.

It seems like they just take one rich privileged voice and amplify the shit out of it so the average person thinks every gay is a liberal who wants Hillary to use pink bombs.

The most dangerous kind of movement in the U.S. from capital's perspective is combining these things together: racial, economic and social into one movement. This is what MLK was beginning to build before the government killed him.

Cuba approves sex change operations
reuters.com/article/idUSN06395397

Communist-ruled Cuba hosts first transgender Mass
reuters.com/article/us-cuba-lgbt-church/communist-ruled-cuba-hosts-first-transgender-mass-idUSKBN1830EZ?il=0

A Transgender Elected Official Reflects an Evolving Cuba
nytimes.com/2013/03/16/world/americas/a-transgender-elected-official-reflects-an-evolving-cuba.html

Anti-trans "christcom" BTFO

Attached: smug45345.jpg (758x692, 94.74K)

Interestingly this follows them putting private property into their constitution and allowing small businesses to operate legally
Funny that

NO IT CAN'T BE CUBA IS BEAUTIFUL SOCIALIST PARADISE

what a retard. Official catholic teaching is still explicitly against it.

catholics officials can get eaten with eggs and salt cause they're fucking PIGS

Official Catholic teaching is still explicitly and in no uncertain terms anti-communist as well. They softened a bit after American death squads killed some of their priests and nuns during the 80s but they are still in bed with global reaction.

Who gives a fuck? I'm not even Catholic but the Catholics were right to call out the atheistic materialism inherent in marxist socialism/communism and propagated in those ML societies. You can't call yourself a Catholic, much less a Christian and be in favor of the sustained persecution carried out by ML states. Take off that flag and just put on the tank one instead. Your god is Marxism, not Jesus, as evidenced by your support of moral d.egeneracy.

Someone tell Zig Forums

Attached: 1343709614787.jpg (300x168, 5.84K)

the last dying grasp of religion in the modern world is to call scientific methods "just another religion"

i bet you think the soviets destroyed churches and banned religion willy nilly

Gulag-ing reactionary fucktards who happen to be christian does not count as "persecution." The west kills millions every year to sustain their cancerous lifestyle yet you decry "moral de-generacy" because you saw a male wearing a dress? Grow the fuck up you infant.

Attached: shut the fuck up liberal katyusha.jpg (1367x1707, 1.03M)

anyone who has a problem should honestly get the fuck off this board, you ain't a leftist.

Attached: 1423984161362-3.png (503x393, 109.78K)

Don't like them, pure bourgeoise decadence. Would not mind getting them a ship to some gay country like Canada.

Also Christ-Com go take your meds you are sperging out again

Attached: 1551216500460.jpg (640x960, 55.48K)

You can't really reject the evidence out of hand without rejecting the very notion of sexual dimorphism in the brain.

Only shows up statistically over a very large sample
It's close to impossible to predict male or female from individual brain scans
Also, the study the tranny brain thing came from was after they were on hormones
Finally similar differences show up between gay and straight males

This is literally true. Homophobes BTFO'd

Attached: stalin_gay.png (608x317, 35.66K)

Stalin would gladly turn him into kvass.

Doctor's plot executions, best day of my life.

It was a fabrication. According to Stalin's daughter, as well as historian Zhores Medvedev, Stalin himself didn't believe the charges and was going to stop the case till death intervened, whereupon the post-Soviet leaders stopped it in his absence, declaring it a fabrication. I've seen nothing indicating it was true.

There was an increase in anti-Semitic phenomena and a general wave of repression and suspicion during the last years of Stalin's life (caused in large part by fears of Zionist influence among Soviet Jews), but Stalin himself privately criticized instances of anti-Semitism during this time, and when Lev Mekhlis (the second most prominent Jewish official associated with Stalin) passed away a month before Stalin himself, an elaborate funeral was ordered.

The main consequence of the aforementioned repression and suspicion was the virtual shutting down of Yiddish cultural expression, which only partially revived after Stalin's death.

lmddgtfy.net/?q=Harry Hay NAMBLA

Wasn't that guy a pedo/hebewhatever?

Guy should have used Beria's memoirs instead, sounds more appealing.

Zhukov where are you comrade, the pedos are out again.

He was probably CIA or FBI by that point. The west is just filth piled on top of the tortured forms of exploited peoples.

You can not take anti-semitism from Russia no matter how many ideologies you shove down the mouths of the population.

Go take your meds

If he's functioning fine in society he doesn't need to
Are you functioning fine ChristCom?

it's blackbeans, rice, and yucca that go with pork

...

Fine, whatever it's synchronous
Transgender identity causes revisionism instead of being a result of it

anti-ideology gang is worst gang