EDGAR HOOVER IS HERE RIGHT FUCKING NOW

I don't go to reddit. I am "native" of this board. If you been here long enough you know you want out of this cesspool.

Then you know just as well as I do that we'll find another cesspool to sink into whenever this one is drained. All the same, it wouldn't be a good sign if this website were ever shut down.

Is the proletariat militia supposed to be looking up to the army of porky? You admire those bootlickers? You think women who will be in militias are going to see it your way, big-dick-energy mister man?
I've known veterans. By forcing the infantry through drilling, desensitizing them to the sound of gunfire, having them train with their weapons, and most of all: making them watch violent films that show fictionalized, Hollywood propaganda that completely glosses over the reality. They go fight and come back ruined. They fight for nothing. The ones that enjoy it— they belong in the gulag.
People do not gain an understanding of violence anywhere other than the battlefield. There is no "conditioning" that isn't just porky's conditioning: you're either made to be numb via being indoctrinated -mostly to not understand the situation or ask questions, to engage in ideological self-deception- or radicalized to take pleasure in letting violence loose without constraints. If you do figure it out, you end up mentally scarred, disfigured. That's because nothing can prepare you. You can only do it well if you're sincerely fighting for something worthwhile, truthful.
This is the natural response of adrenaline, so what do you mean? People don't start sobbing in the corner in combat… maybe a handful of people have a sudden panic reaction but most will not ever be trained well enough to be fearless, yet still capable of carrying out duties under fire. The people who can do it with no fear are indoctrinated to believe in objectively untrue things, and thus can act totally without regarded to facts and threats. If you want disposable allies, go be brownshirt. It is especially useless and deranged to tell someone under pressure that they should've just masturbated to guro more often.
Than not?
It seems you are experiencing the Dunning-Kruger effect.
If your view of materialism and the dialectic is that it is a pedestrian philosophy of immoralism made to indulge your every selfish whim, then of course you deny any Marxist ethic on the ground that all things are justified in the pursuit of Marxism, especially tea parties where the tea is child blood. That is not grounded in Marxist theory at all. There will be morality before the revolution; there will be morality afterwards. That morality is an ethic dictated by Marxist theory. Fucking… duh.
Psyche yourself up as much as you want, you're a nazbol.
Marxism isn't biology, it's economics and sociology. I don't give a damn that you want to mutilate people you personally dislike. You are a danger; wannabe serial killers from the lumpenproletariat should stick to joining up with the imperialist, "professional" armies.
The proletariat revolution by living proles in the world of feeling shit and crying when people die- and fucking, IDK maybe having a conscience and not being super angry at the world for you being a virgin- will have no need of this fantasy land game you've concocted in your head.
You reek of immaturity so I'm treating you like you do. Go fuck a woman, comrade. Stop masturbating to guns. When you realize what you're fighting for is people, maybe you'll start acting like them, being a human with some dignity again.

Attached: 1452460978298.png (531x379, 89.91K)

No, but this does not change the fact that you will be fighting this army of porky and as such must be prepared to do so. The bourgeoisie will spare no expense in crushing any attempt at revolutionary socialism and no moral code will impede them preventing the establishment of a socialist governance. If you want to know what happens to socialist movements that do not go far enough, that do not match their enemies in conviction or severity, look at what happened to many of those who participated the various failed socialist revolutions that took place in Latin America. That is the fate of the revolutionary masses if we fail.
This is idealism. If your mind could not be conditioned or shaped, you would not be here making moralist appeals about how we shouldn't do so.
And our enemies will be conditioned and trained to extend themselves beyond their untrained limits. Would you have us accept this and just hope that through idealist virtue alone we will be able to out persevere them?
You make large assumption here, and what I am saying is done with the intent of preserving and saving life in the long run.
I did not say this
Nitpicking is not an argument
You should know rejecting moralism when engaging in an analysis of capitalism or discussing the necessary "revolutionary terror" of a socialist revolution does not mean indulging in your every selfish whim.
Your straw-manning here. Even so, the reason we are not going around having tea parties with childs blood during revolutions is because doing so would not bring us closer to socialism in the slightest. There is a reason I have been stressing necessity this entire time.
I'm curious what goes through your head when I say "We must do whatever is necessary". Do you just imagine me telling you to that we must engage in the most frivolous hedonistic masturbatory things because that's what you've put into your head as "necessary"? I also have no idea what you mean by "That morality is an ethic dictated by Marxist theory". What does that even mean?

(cont.)

It is in no way NazBol
clin·i·cal
2. efficient and unemotional; coldly detached. ex: "the clinical detail of a textbook"
There is my one nitpick now
Nowhere did I say this. Revenge seeking and unneeded mutilation is a waste of time and unnecessary. The time and resources could be better spent elsewhere.
I am not for unnecessary wanton slaughter towards individuals whom it would be a waste of time to kill. I am for strict, targeted violence towards necessary targets who impede the progression of a possible socialist revolution. Know the difference.
More character attacks with no basis.
I am not angry user. I am not engaging in perverse revenge seeking like some degenerate with a "list" of personal grievances and people to issue retribution against. I am stating that what must be done and what you may be called to do will not be comfortable and will be personally unnerving if not debilitating if you are not prepared, and thus that you should prepare. That is all.

Yes, because they utilize foot soldiers who are indoctrinated and ideologically blind to the horrors they are made to carry out. Most soldiers can't take the pressure and end up severely broken people. In a class struggle, proletarian militias- full of class conscious irregulars- would also end up with PTSD if you started making them slaughter their neighbors. That's exactly why they should have a proper dialectical opposition to enemies. Those who go against their class interests should be their targets. Your idea of "clean up" is euphemistic in a very sneering way. You're condescending that you're more of a true and honest Marxist because you'll kill people on ideological grounds eagerly while your average prole would only be motivated to kill necessary, direct antagonists of their wellbeing.
You denigrate the efforts of the proletariat everywhere by reducing them to simply not having strong enough convictions You think socialist revolutions fail, in short, because they are not willing to kill ideological opponents to homogenize their thinking… because they are weak, and weakness… weakness is bad. I truly feel sorrow thinking of the dead having been so utterly wasted.
If it can, why do you need to be obsessed with killing as a method to safeguard socialism? Is there not re-education through hard labor? Is there not an argument to be made to shape the minds of ideological opponents? If you give up on that, give up on changing your own mind. Just kill them instead. Then, expect to be killed in kind when you're no longer needed to handle the dirty things the newly born socialist state asked of you in revolution. If you believed that, sure, I'd agree. Like Moses never entering the promised land because of his momentary losses of faith. If you're fighting to live a better life that you cherish, wouldn't you rather it weren't entirely stained by poor decisions that got innocents killed?
I am advocating taking reality for what it is, acceptance. You should apply your awareness to the moment, not overly planned out scenarios of what-ifs. Deal in realities that are in front of you. Indoctrination and homogenized thinking about this won't help with coping after the fact. In a way, your thinking is just an inversion of some utopian inkling that one can convince everyone… all the same one thinks they must be capable of killing anyone who stands in the way. That's a paradox, really; however strong you want to play pretend at being, you'd be worthless if you really were the way you portray yourself. There's no point in living for ideology alone. The thing that lies beneath ones personal obsession with seeing that better world is some insecurity that led them to alienation and seeking conflict. That is to say… passion and love for something that maybe one doesn't understand themselves. If you can accept that then one must necessarily have something valuable, stakes. With that, you can't just deny that you'd be fighting for people. Marxism as politic is class struggle: it is only the fight for the betterment of the lives of the proletariat. At the core of it is not some glorious death and killing, but emptiness and want, desire. What do you really want? To feel like a hero? To be loved? Are you just surviving until you can find some secret, some fucking meaning…?
If there isn't the overwhelming combination of defectors from military and decently trained militias, there won't be any beating those people. No amount of LARPing and hyping yourself up is going to change the fact that an army of the people will be irregular and need to use irregular tactics. The most qualified people will be military defectors, officers and the like. Often, it's not the vanguard who occupy those roles.
I'm suggesting that there is no forcing victory via willpower or individualist actions. What happens must happen as a natural development of events. I'm suggesting it would be better to die with one's principles than to be reduced to some pathetic inversion of one's enemies.

Attached: 1524904237992 (1).jpg (589x589, 46.92K)

cont.
Whatever your say, Stefan. This is a light discussion despite your combative reading of the room, not an argument at all, so? lol?
Do you know this? It seems you think highly of your preparations, yet you seem aloof of your own motives and thinking. Back off from that all you want, your initial post did you no favors. Your idea of "clinical" is more "comical" to my palate. People will not engage in killing people like you described originally. They will not execute people with extreme prejudice. You think peoples emotions are "unnecessary" whereas I know they are the thing that makes revolution happen. Not singular, individualist sentiments, but the alienation of a great many at a focal point in human history.
Marxist thought has its own ethics stemming from it. It's like you want to believe purges and the like are what porky describes them as, as bloodshed against convenient, "justifiable" targets to eliminate dissent. That sort of thing is porky's methods, not rooted in Marxism.
I was making a joke, you buffoon. You are such a nihilist grump, a total borefest. I feel you are sad. Do you want a hug? I really shouldn't be so mocking of you. It seems you have a lot on your shoulders, going it alone like you are. By questioning you, am I causing distress? I apologize.
So you are for it when it's convenient targets? You might as well just admit it. There's no point in having a caveat if it's a meaningless distinction. If you justify anything and everything as acceptable if it is necessary, then you aren't using your critical thinking or mindfulness moment to moment. Then one wouldn't care about any form of innocence, not needing trials or a process, not even the scantest imitations of it. Action for action's sake— this, also, is considered an element of the fascist mindset.
I just don't believe you. I don't see you doubting your own statements; you are sincere and totally lacking in healthy skepticism of your own beliefs. What I do not believe is that you want to be this way. If you have any ambition in life, what does a merciless revolution have to do with that desire? Is it a negative one, then…? If you really have lost something, I'm truly sorry it has manifested in this frustration and anger (and no, just because you blandly assert you are not anger does not make it convincing). It makes me naive to your mind, because I am less prepared to act as you think is proper. I think that you believe you are wise and in control. To my estimation, you are nothing more than someone hoping you can win by emulating what you think is proven; that proven methodology, however, has only maintained a culture of justifying atrocity in the name of whatever crutch is convenient. It accelerates time and again pointless slaughter. So it is a proven failure, nothing more.

Attached: civilization.jpg (696x936, 144.71K)