I’m a trot because permeant revolution is unironicaly good idea, not because I hate Stalin. (I don’t)
A communist future? Of course it is inevitable...
well talk about this when they start doing
any kind of socialist shit instead of talking how great il will be in 100 years
wipo.int
Who doesn't know that the American constitution includes references to Marx and Lenin and subscribes to the principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his work".
dengists must be hanged
too bad they dont respect it, or have any institutions where citizens can try to enforce it
They still have unequal development of city and countryside, a GDP per capita lower than Iraq, and are not self-sufficient in terms of food and energy.
They don't seem to call Cuba and the DPRK ultraleftists.
Mao was reliant on a private sector as well. Stalin could only do that because Russia has enough resources to be autarkic. Plus Russia wasn't industrialised, where as China today already is industrialised. Centralised planned economies are useful to increase raw industrial output but have shown to have flaws at higher stages of development.
I know, and even the CPC admits that legal recourse within the jurisdiction of public and administrative law is flawed and lacking. This is why they are currently trying to expand that sector within the legal system. Also remember that a better administrative jurisdiction will also mean that capitalists will more safely get their compensation everytime their property rights are infringed upon. It cuts both ways.
dude just make private property illegal lmao
A) they could import food and oil after going full central planing (the soviets did it) after all China has a monopoly on rare earth minerals that it could export to countries willing to trade with it after going socialist.
If Kim Jong Un was a Chinese citizen they’d call him ultraleft.
If a single Anglo could figure out how to do a planed economy in a highly developed nation. The entirety of China can figure it out to.