Is this AI correct?

Fucking clones and the devil?

Hatsune Miku donned a NKVD battle dress uniform and picked up her battle rifle and shotgun, heading toward the battlefield. However, as all of the members of Shinigami's elite army were killed, Miku was too lazy to follow them. She was forced to make her way, however, when another member came out of a nearby building. "Please protect us!"

When Miku approached the figure, she saw that it was the second person who came out to protect the Miku and her friends. They were all wearing Miku costume, except for a very thin Miku wearing a uniform. "I am the Miku who rescued you! I will protect you from the devil, and I will keep you safe when you are taken to heaven!" Miku said to the devil by herself, thinking it too easy. But when this particular devil approached Miku, she realized that he was not only human, but that he was from another dimension… and that his body was actually a body of an angel

Who is the person speaking the last comment? Are these the inner thoughts of Hillary?

One of the best critiques of liberal ideology I've ever read.

Does "systems of mind" refer to thinking automata such as the algorithm itself? If so, this fragment is telling us something very important. In the first analysis, we might think that such automata will destroy all purpose in the world. No, there is one opening, for "those who wish to use the automata" will recreate the world in their image.

I'm terrified. What isn't the devil telling us? Is it a self-referential joke, the algorithm itself being a devil that is not telling us what it is not telling us?
Stirner seems absolutely black-pilled here, unable to conceive of any way for an egoist to still have property in our world. "less than nothing"? Has Stirner been reading Zizek? This all obviously deserves a deeper philosophical reading than I am capable of.
"If I could only take my head and let people do their thoughts, what would I say?" sounds like the algorithm reflecting on itself. In a way, he can and does "take his head and let people do their thoughts."
"Well I can talk about how I feel, or I can talk about how people would feel if things hadn't gone the way they were going." This is a strong hint as to what this algorithm really does. The "or" should be read as an "in other words".

Fascists get the wall.

Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. It's called fucking democracy.

Fascists just want power. Fascists just want the whole fucking world to come crashing down on them. Fascists just want to take over the world. Fascists want to build a fascist dictatorship right here. Fascists just want power. FUCKFUCKFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKE

Fascists have taken over my country.

Fascists are fucking taking over your country. Fascists are fucking taking over your America. Fascists are fucking taking over your USA. FUCKFUCKFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRA

Any of you guys want to organize a game? Sounds pretty fun tbh.

Communism is a movement which claims ownership of society and does not seek to impose itself on it, but will always seek to preserve it for ourselves as long as we have existence and if we have freedom and opportunity to make our own choices – I have never seen a movement which has any more reason to be called socialism.

And why are people calling for us to be socialist if we already call ourselves communists? How the hell does Marx have any socialist ideas?!

I agree with you. For what it's worth, I just bought a $700 computer and I haven't had a single clue why the name is in the bottom right corner in the menu of any computer.

We can never have a perfect system. We can't eliminate racism, and we can't eliminate sexism. We know that's not possible, but we have to look at the system and make sure that the human beings that inhabit it are human and fair to all

How did Socrates respond to Marx?

The only person with the authority and authority to do so, was the philosopher and thinker Plato. But in that case he was not the only person in the history of mankind, that is, the world has not been this way. It should be the other way round, if one were inclined to the theory that is put forward by Marx. If we accept the concept of alienation, then the relation between work and the alienated is necessarily a relation of exploitation and is necessarily an association between individuals whose sole value is in their own labour time. This is not the way our relation has been throughout all our history. It is impossible to describe or to describe capitalism as an industrial or an agricultural economy; but in fact what Marx saw as the essence of capitalism as a complex system, if one is inclined to take into account the theory of alienation.

What the fuck are the replies to this thread? Are people actually replying, or are these auto-generated posts made by the AI described by OP?

At some point, machinery will transcend capitalism into mechanical socialism before humans develop organic socialism. Eventually, human life will exceed that of machines.

This is just one of the many arguments against the use of machine intelligence by society. What would the future of intelligence look like if they were to be replaced by machines?

1. Machine intelligence is a danger for the planet

Some people are saying we should keep the machine intelligence. In my opinion, there are several reasons our current human evolution is wrong. First, the human species is not the only member of the animal world with an intelligent intelligence. In fact, the human species is the fifth most intelligent species on the planet.

Second, these people don't see the danger in replacing human species intelligence so often over the decades. Third, the risk

How did Nietzche respond to Marx?

Marx was the author of a chapter on human beings in his The Communist Manifesto , titled What is Human Life like? A Critique . He saw the human body as the most important factor of economic existence, and wrote about being human with an acute, penetrating intellect. In the course of writing the chapter, he became interested in other ways to use technology, in particular electricity . He saw it as a sort of "holy grail of technology."

By studying the writings of the 18th-century French philosopher John Stuart Mill in The Human Condition , Marx saw Mill as his own personal philosopher. He also took notice of how Marx argued that humans are not completely separate from the environment — that we're a co-dependent social organism. He argued, for example, that if capitalism produces a lot of environmental stress and suffering

How can we get to full communism ie. a post scarcity society safely and expediently with minimal disruption from society or the individual? How can we deal with environmental issues and climate change? Who holds the land? This is important to note because we're discussing global problems and not one country. The land, water and air systems are very complex systems and must be managed in the correct manner.

Another potential issue we run into: What if we need to move some or all of our resources from one resource base in one country to another? Which country? What will it take to reach that point?

So now we need to think of what we can do in a global perspective, in an effortless fashion; in a kind of global cooperation, where the world doesn't have to worry about one side of an issue but rather all of our issues co-determined in some logical and efficient manner and we can simply take an

Try the ai it's quite interesting
The above was generated with

How can we get to full communism ie. a post scarcity society safely and expediently with minimal disruption to the individual and society?

What are the problems with allowing capitalism to continue to flourish? How is it economically and socially necessary for us to have private property? Why do private property and profits come with a very high cost of production? Where does money come from? Why was money created? Why did we have to have money? Why did banks and governments regulate us? I want to understand these things.

I want to have a world where I am free to pursue my thoughts and ideas without coercion or threat. That's not free, that's enslavement.

My freedom.

COMMUNISM WILL WIN if it creates enough jobs," says the poster. "That is why we need a socialist leader to create the jobs."

Another poster reads: "We must have jobs for everyone. A socialist government will guarantee that every man, woman and child from birth has a job."

Another poster read: "We need to protect our children, protect our forests, protect our oceans and protect our air; We do not need another war in the Middle East."

Another poster read: "You can't make America great again without your children."

The poster, which went up along with the election campaign video, is part of a broader effort to encourage people to vote Republican and has been endorsed by the GOP's national committee.

The new group, called the Not Socialist Party, will distribute nearly 2,000 stickers for people to place on cars in Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa.

Peak ideology is being a Republican Nazbol Communist

How can we get to full communism ie. a post scarcity society safely and expediently with minimal disruption to the individual and society?

There is certainly some confusion. First, there is the myth that we can start with a low level of communism where everyone can become full communists. However, even on that low level there are still several critical features to be expected.

First, individuals must be actively involved. They will form an essential community and have a role that allows them to influence what happens within their communities, including the wider society. Second, individuals must be able to express their true political attitudes. This includes their attitudes towards government and other authorities (as well as the public and the government itself), and whether they consider themselves part of the minority or more advanced than that. Third, governments and their various branches within states are a vital aspect of the society

You know you can just generate again from the seed text if you get garbage right?

Attached: 1557391818101555797596.jpg (1050x675, 126.32K)

How to achieve post-scarcity full communism
By Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson

No one has more to lose from the revolution than the privileged. That is what is currently taking place in the United States; what is at stake is the very survival of the capitalist system.

The revolution is not only the realization of what most people have been waiting for over forty years, even in advanced capitalist countries. The revolution will also create a more profound transformation in social relations and the political institutions that have served as barriers to that transformation. It will produce, not even for those few, but for the majority, an explosion of political freedoms, including an explosion of civic life: open and honest debate and freedom of thought and expression—the freedom to express a certain attitude to political questions, opinions, and concerns in the

Attached: 1557395795733-1344473248.jpg (1050x819, 131.57K)

t-thanks

Attached: oracle.png (462x177, 6.14K)

The New Communist Manifesto
By Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson
Chapter 25: A Call To Action , which I posted in February 2009
Chapter 26: The Case for a Stateless Society
"The fact that there are a finite number of people in any society, or even that each lives in some definite environment, is no matter what his needs. For one cannot expect that each human being will be happy in every situation, or in every culture - that is, that he shall be able to solve his problems satisfactorily; he is not obliged to have this or that sort of an environment, for any individual. " (Zizek, 2008, 7) The basic condition of all human beings, and of all human living conditions in general, is that they are all related collectively for some purpose or other. There can be no such thing as a random process of chance or randomization. All people are members of the same human family. It was Marx, in writing Capital (and the next

Attached: 15573984810271247323333.jpg (1050x531, 93.89K)

Attached: Screenshot_20190509-125425_Chrome.jpg (1077x347, 85.41K)

Full Communist Manifesto
By Jordan Peterson, Nick Land, and Slavoj Zizek

In July 2010, a group of liberal intellectuals began organizing protests around the world, drawing strength from their faith in the ideas of the free-market capitalist. These protests made inroads in several countries, including the United States. Now it has become apparent to many Americans that such demonstrations are becoming increasingly unpopular as income equality continues to crumble. Although a few liberal intellectuals are still organizing protests, most Americans see such protests through the common lens of income inequality. The growing awareness that inequality is affecting American life is prompting Americans to express their own discontent even if they are not politically correct to show their emotions. The rising anger and distrust of political correctness has become a phenomenon known as "political correctness." In the past few weeks, we have

Attached: 1557406976550-1337896510.jpg (1050x711, 136.77K)

Acceleration; Full Communism and Post-Scarcity
By Jordan Peterson, Nick Land, and Slavoj Zizek
(www.transcendentalprojectors.net)
The only political science that matters today may be Marxism, but it doesn't have anything to say about how to apply this new philosophy to the problems of the time, including the problems of the current era. By contrast, the Marxist philosophy offers an important vision for overcoming contemporary forms of exploitation and domination. The two can be combined. The two can be linked more easily than one might prefer in practice. And this is especially true for the latter. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that a major part of the problem with capitalism is the persistence of power as it does not disappear with the passage of time. Capitalist "institutions" and the "rule" of "capitalists" in society are often seen as permanent and immutable, but under Marx the problem can grow and grow

Attached: 1557412282820-1816971560.jpg (1050x675, 140.03K)

The name of this trash can is ideology. Its purpose is to be the catalyst for the end of this country, for us to end any kind of violence, any bigotry, any racism, any inequality in our society, our society is becoming a place where there is this sense of victimization, this culture where people just feel very ashamed of each other," he said.

Not bad

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-09 Talk to Transformer.png (566x360, 25.92K)

Praxisbot

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-09_1900 Talk to Transformer.png (568x564, 18.79K)

nstall Gentoo is installing communism !!! We all know the benefits of freedom and it's great to realize our dreams! Our goal for today is make more people happy with the freedom to use computers and to use them to make more valuable lives for themselves. We want more people to enjoy free software and free software support. If enough people support us with their donations it will be our dream of building the world's most powerful free software.

Now reboot again, and you will see a message that has changed. The system needs a fresh install of systemd.
So now we need to install GENTOO to our Gentoo system.
Fucking liberals trying to liberalize by gentoo install.

The most homosexual of all political ideologies is fascism, because it gives preference to the interests of homosexual groups, and also seeks to create a fascist elite of homosexuals who will dominate the country.

The homosexual elites of Europe have created a new type of oligarchic form of organization, like the British oligarchs of the olden days, who in order to maintain their position as a powerful ruling class, will seek to rule over the masses through psychological warfare, by the blackmail, fear mongering, and coercion of its members.

This homosexual-dominated oligarchy is to be distinguished from the "liberal" oligarchy of the olden days, in which the individual and family are free to become as much as they wish, and all the decisions of their actions are respected by their fellow-men, because the society as a whole is not politically motivated, only in

In a recent tweet, Ben Shapiro announced he identified as a "young white woman of Mediterranean descent and self-identified LGBTQ."

@benshapiro If you're a young white male of Mediterranean descent & self identified bisexual who identifies as a young white male & is an LGBTQQTQTAAH! Thanks for posting, please don't forget to link to your profile. — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) October 24, 2013

Here is what the tweet implied: Shapiro was an open advocate of anti-bullying in schools.

At its first appearance, Shapiro posted screenshots of himself in the class. He posted a text message saying they were too "cute" to show to others so he could "totally take away your future self from you" and the two never did. He also tweeted, "A picture would be nice but I don't want to be like 'a little f*cking dick'" and that "I think that's really important and

Interesting. Very interesting.

Attached: einstein.JPG (571x359, 72.57K)

A spectre is haunting Europe, the spectre of the French Revolution. A great man once said, "The first thing the bourgeoisie wants is more money, the second that it gets more power, the third that it gets more money". In France, that would be the CGT (Collective of Labour, which is known as the biggest trade union force in the country) and in many of the European countries that are currently ruled by the CGT, the workers are getting ever weaker and their movement is dying out faster than their country can recover.

This time, the CGT is getting more radical. The radicalisation has already begun. In France and Italy, the CGT (Organisation of the Communes, also known as CGTM) is setting up their own political organisations, which aim to put forward a completely different type of political agenda, for example on the labour movement. In Austria, the "National Council (Federation of Workers) of the CGT is

```Ben Shapiro: “I have sex with dolphins”
Slavoj Zizek:``` Oh, yeah. This is such a very specific thing. I had sex with a dolphin because one day he asked me some pretty hard questions about the nature of the world and about my place in it and I got lost in it. He was really curious and kind and fascinating.
Shapiro: You wrote a book about sex, called Noam Chomsky on Sex, in which you argue that it's not as simple as it seems.
Zizek: Well, I wouldn't say it is. [He laughs.] But this is important, because these kinds of questions and insights have helped me get more deeply into consciousness and, ultimately, become a more radical intellectual.
Shapiro: You say that the world is a collection of "things not to be fucked with." How do you feel about that?
Zizek: I'm just glad that the subject matter is relevant, and that we, as human beings, are able to put our heads together and think about it. Not to take anything away from anyone—

I mean, it's pretty good with yiff

Attached: talk to transformer tails.png (844x259 72.21 KB, 36.3K)

Also I want this fanfic now

Attached: dolphinfuck.jpg (700x242, 81.83K)

Nuclear war is the only way to achieve communism.

The USSR was not a communist state. The Soviets were never, in fact, a totalitarian regime. All the Communist authorities in Eastern Europe were simply socialist regimes that made it very difficult for us to see ourselves as part of any kind of genuine socialist bloc.

The Soviet system was a system where everybody played their part, and everyone's part was to achieve his own goals. The regime in Ukraine was a regime where everybody saw everybody else's future; people saw the Soviet Union as their mother, the Soviets themselves as their father. The Soviet Union became a great force in helping build the socialist countries of Eastern Europe that would be able to fight against their own enemies and help their own people. It was a system of mutual support that created a very strong economic relationship between socialist countries that were able to use Soviet assets – their steel, their rubber, their oil – to fight for socialism.

When I was on the board of directors for RT, I realized we were living in the Kremlin era. RT was one of the last voices of democracy to express its opinions and make its voices heard

Yeah,it works.

Attached: 1424755261971.png (587x489, 26.45K)

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US Armed Forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for what's coming. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to

...

*Karl Marx stands still, smoke coming out of his gun. The deed is done. Engels* is dead. He's gone to heaven.

It's the ending, you know. After they get it. After they give up trying to make it.

This is the very first chapter in the biography of Marx for anyone else but the author (see my review here).

"It is a good book but it has not been properly adapted to the world of the contemporary academic. It's much more 'progressive' than that, but in that respect it makes sense for it's world of the contemporary academic," writes the author, Michael Hennessey.

For that reason, his book will likely just be a bestseller.

Here's the review:

The most striking and fascinating fact in this book is its sheer power. It is both a biography, and an argument for Marx's politics, and indeed one of the main parts of this book. I am not at all sure how good Hennessey's book is, but it certainly has its merits, and the reader deserves a book like that. Even

The AI has spoken:

Can we trust Jeremy Corbyn to finally end capitalism once and for all? Is he the true messiah that Karl Marx predicted would bring about communism? The answer is obvious: He probably isn't.

Corbyn is not a Marxist, and even if he were, he would never be able to make the same radical, transformational change for the entire capitalist class. He would fail spectacularly.

One has to be cautious to consider any Labour leader as a panacea for the problem we face in Britain today. You cannot claim a radical vision for society that will turn around decades of austerity, and millions of poor young people facing downward spiralling poverty.

It takes more than one party leader to change all of the dynamics of a system that's been in place since 1945.

A Marxist who could not win an election because he lacks class conscious vision, and who had to rely on his right-wing supporters to vote for him, didn't have it all his way.

An anti-corporate socialist who, to the extent possible, was able to push neoliberal austerity in an anti-corporate direction did have his fingers

however; the average life expectancy in the USSR rose just from 30 years old to 40 after the onset of the Holodomor.

In fact, there's evidence suggesting the real death toll would be in the tens of thousands, and yet the Soviet governments didn't care enough to do anything about it. This leads me to my favourite of all the quotes, which I read about three times in the book. It appears in the book that, in the US, the USSR got rid of a lot of the old people, and replaced them with baby boomers (which, according to the book, were about half of the old people we had in America). I don't know about the rest of the world, but I think if they'd just let a whole lot of baby boomers into the USSR, the Soviet Union wouldn't face so many deaths.

Communism will not be built on the backs of slave laborers. Nor will it succeed on the backs of immigrants. The Communist Party will be built on coal, steel, and lumber. Its greatest achievement will be to raise the standard of living of every working man and woman and bring about the reduction of working hours.

Reads like Pravda, perfect.

Tfw

Attached: Screenshot_20190514-111332.png (540x960, 124.81K)

Fucking based

Gave it the same input and also got the copypasta, nice

Attached: robots took my job.jpg (192x191, 8.36K)

Running it a few more times got me some interesting results.

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target."

"But President Trump told you to stay out of this!" Nora protested, pushing him away with her hands on her hips as she glared at him, "And you've got an actual military to do your bidding?"

The man shook his head, smiling as he held up his hands for no one in particular in particular, "I gots the job done for once, and that's why I'm your boss." The man then turned to Nora, smiling warmly and giving her a little bow. "Now, let's get these assholes out of here, they're fucking crazy. I'll take care of them."

The three made their way towards the car where Mr O'Neill and two other men

Communism is the future.

Redpilled as fuck.

Attached: jimmy-savile.jpg (1000x563, 509.83K)

"I once farted so loud it caused my balls to rumble. It was epic" - Vladimir Lenin
"That was epic." - Frederich Engels
"That was hard to beat… I swear that was one of the most painful experiences of my life. Not just in our small room, not only to hear my breath rattling… to see the blood run down the walls of our empty house, we were forced to keep it together every second of every breath… I know the pain that drove me. A kind of pain I could never describe. Even my first breath that I was given was a very unpleasant one. My nose began to bleed, but my entire body screamed in protest. It was terrible." - Otto Dixhue, from German Revolution, 1864.

Eating ass is the only ethical consumption under capitalism. In fact all food is evil.

To do otherwise requires ignoring the vast array of natural things we can't live without, including nature itself. It's the same with a healthy diet. If you're thinking "eating meat" or "eating fish" or "eating trees and rocks" or "eating food grown from crops" they are "not evil." But they are also impossible to do. These behaviors would require you to abandon your daily eating of the foods you like best—and the fruits, vegetables, and herbs you love (even fruit juice from trees). It's just not possible or ethical.

And by the way, eating animals is the best thing you can do. All of the resources and products that we consume in this world—and everything that remains—is created from a tiny fraction—the world's tiny fraction—of natural resources and resources created naturally and continuously by humans. Every day we destroy more natural resources and products by using them for our own use and consumption than any other major source of energy in the world. The destruction of nature by industrial agriculture is the

I laughed at this one

Griffith did nothing wrong. He was just a guy in his 30s wearing a red and white jersey; not a man for the most part that would say something so stupid as to try to put on a black suit.

Advertisement

This is not so much a personal battle as it is a battle of wills.

At times like these, both sides appear to be just one massive ego stroking machine. But the reality will eventually come on the other side of this particular conflict. It will come when it seems that Griffith's "crime" wasn't as offensive as they had been led to believe, and in the end it won't help her career at this point in her career. But here we have a scenario that will end with Griffith having to either admit that something has gone terribly wrong at the time and get help; or admit that they are part of the problem and take steps to correct it (and perhaps to have sex with someone who will help fix it once he realizes that this has put him in such an awkward situation where he has to face all this).

Advertisement

This is only the beginning.

Attached: griffith2.jpg (1280x720, 86.36K)

Gay.

Attached: suck.jpeg (1280x850, 281.53K)

Posting your gay porn collection to own the libs.

I have trouble believing that the AI generated this but I can't find any site that it (or you) ripped it from. This is actually good.

The difference between capitalism and communism is that under communism the class consciousness and social life is more clearly established and the state is only a vehicle for carrying out the aims of these classes. However, in capitalism the state functions as a tool for imposing political power over and above the working class and society as a whole.

The capitalist state is a social system in which a class of exploiters has power above the working class and the oppressed majority. The worker is a subordinate class — or, more correctly considered, has a privileged position in the capitalist system. Under this system a worker, by nature, is an oppressed class who is being exploited under circumstances which are not in line with their nature and which render it unable to act in their own interests. Under capitalism the worker lives under the control of a large number of exploiters who exploit the worker to the utmost. Under capitalism there is more of a class conflict between the workers, who live under the system of class exploitation, and the employers who live under the system of the capitalist system. It is these struggles which lead to the breakdown of the system through the destruction or degeneration of the productive forces. A more or less stable system is not only possible, but necessary for the survival of mankind.

The end of Capitalism will come in approximately four years, just like the beginning of the Great Recession.

As I mentioned above, the same process will begin in the United States, where at the very least there will be massive unemployment during the time of the next crisis.

The economic crisis will, indeed, result in massive unemployment, the collapse of the economy, the impoverishment of millions of people, and of course, violent revolt against the ruling class's "troublemakers" and "enemies."

The United States, like Britain, will not only become a Third World country, but will become a hellhole, as it also is today.

The last word on fascism, of course, is not to scare anyone – it is just that fascism does not exist anymore. It was born after World War II in the United States, which is not surprising, given the immense support for fascism that was demonstrated in this country during the 20s and 30s.

But, there is another type of fascism that is currently gaining strength around the world – one that believes in "New World Order", or "globalized fascism" – and that is based on the concept of "global capital" , which is very much in

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Wed) 02:43:27 PM No. 118325

>118314

I wonder what this guy looks like.

Maybe someone else can post some pictures of him. I saw this on r/gigafap so I hope he's not trolling us and that we can find him on the subreddit.

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Wed) 03:14:35 PM No. 118330 >>118325

this guy is a kinkster but isnt really all that active or active all day. this guy is a kinkster but isnt really all that active or active all day.

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Wed) 04:13:12 PM No. 115326 >>118325

he's probably an online lolicon

I know, dude, you're the only one who can see me like that. this guy is a kinkster but isnt really all that active or active all day.

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Wed) 04:21:39 PM No

Bordiga died twice and did all that? wtf i'm leftccom now!

This AI is straight up just Marxpilled. Two words and I get this.

Capitalism is at the heart of our political system. Capitalism as the primary form of production will lead to the demise of other forms of production, as the economy is driven into endless cycles of recessions and recessions. We are forced to accept the collapse and decay of capitalist systems as a norm, in exchange for continued economic growth.

By default, capitalism allows a state of perpetual expansion and an insatiable drive towards ever-extending consumption, even as population increases to meet ever-expanding demand. We live in times of intense industrialization (as in the case of countries like China, India, and Brazil) that increase industrialization's ability to produce ever more power, and increase industrial labor power.

This is not the system that any one culture or civilization has designed. But, we live in one that embraces it and it serves as the basis for our survival and culture. The system is a system designed in such a way to ensure that no other system can function without it, so people continue to consume as it grows into ever more powerful forces that can take over anything within reach.

Our current economic and social systems have been designed in such a way that when a population grows too much, the system becomes broken,

Preamble to IWW Constitution:

Text completion:

The trade unions should be reformed to eliminate their monopoly within the industries. The government should stop financing the trade unions even on the condition that these unions provide workers' organizations and that such organizations provide full rights to all workers

I decided to try using it to complete the list that was started in this YouTube Poop:

youtube.com/watch?v=rG_Ue3t17l0

Attached: 2019-06-01_14h21_48.png (591x800 76.79 KB, 75.49K)