Hatsune Miku donned a NKVD battle dress uniform and picked up her battle rifle and shotgun, heading toward the battlefield. However, as all of the members of Shinigami's elite army were killed, Miku was too lazy to follow them. She was forced to make her way, however, when another member came out of a nearby building. "Please protect us!"
When Miku approached the figure, she saw that it was the second person who came out to protect the Miku and her friends. They were all wearing Miku costume, except for a very thin Miku wearing a uniform. "I am the Miku who rescued you! I will protect you from the devil, and I will keep you safe when you are taken to heaven!" Miku said to the devil by herself, thinking it too easy. But when this particular devil approached Miku, she realized that he was not only human, but that he was from another dimension… and that his body was actually a body of an angel
Benjamin Jones
Who is the person speaking the last comment? Are these the inner thoughts of Hillary?
One of the best critiques of liberal ideology I've ever read.
Does "systems of mind" refer to thinking automata such as the algorithm itself? If so, this fragment is telling us something very important. In the first analysis, we might think that such automata will destroy all purpose in the world. No, there is one opening, for "those who wish to use the automata" will recreate the world in their image.
I'm terrified. What isn't the devil telling us? Is it a self-referential joke, the algorithm itself being a devil that is not telling us what it is not telling us? Stirner seems absolutely black-pilled here, unable to conceive of any way for an egoist to still have property in our world. "less than nothing"? Has Stirner been reading Zizek? This all obviously deserves a deeper philosophical reading than I am capable of. "If I could only take my head and let people do their thoughts, what would I say?" sounds like the algorithm reflecting on itself. In a way, he can and does "take his head and let people do their thoughts." "Well I can talk about how I feel, or I can talk about how people would feel if things hadn't gone the way they were going." This is a strong hint as to what this algorithm really does. The "or" should be read as an "in other words".
Owen Martinez
Fascists get the wall.
Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Bill of Rights. Fucking fascists get rid of your fucking Constitution. It's called fucking democracy.
Fascists just want power. Fascists just want the whole fucking world to come crashing down on them. Fascists just want to take over the world. Fascists want to build a fascist dictatorship right here. Fascists just want power. FUCKFUCKFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKE
Fascists have taken over my country.
Fascists are fucking taking over your country. Fascists are fucking taking over your America. Fascists are fucking taking over your USA. FUCKFUCKFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRAUCKEFRA
Any of you guys want to organize a game? Sounds pretty fun tbh.
Isaac Bailey
Communism is a movement which claims ownership of society and does not seek to impose itself on it, but will always seek to preserve it for ourselves as long as we have existence and if we have freedom and opportunity to make our own choices – I have never seen a movement which has any more reason to be called socialism.
And why are people calling for us to be socialist if we already call ourselves communists? How the hell does Marx have any socialist ideas?!
I agree with you. For what it's worth, I just bought a $700 computer and I haven't had a single clue why the name is in the bottom right corner in the menu of any computer.
We can never have a perfect system. We can't eliminate racism, and we can't eliminate sexism. We know that's not possible, but we have to look at the system and make sure that the human beings that inhabit it are human and fair to all
Juan Ward
How did Socrates respond to Marx?
The only person with the authority and authority to do so, was the philosopher and thinker Plato. But in that case he was not the only person in the history of mankind, that is, the world has not been this way. It should be the other way round, if one were inclined to the theory that is put forward by Marx. If we accept the concept of alienation, then the relation between work and the alienated is necessarily a relation of exploitation and is necessarily an association between individuals whose sole value is in their own labour time. This is not the way our relation has been throughout all our history. It is impossible to describe or to describe capitalism as an industrial or an agricultural economy; but in fact what Marx saw as the essence of capitalism as a complex system, if one is inclined to take into account the theory of alienation.
Cameron Anderson
What the fuck are the replies to this thread? Are people actually replying, or are these auto-generated posts made by the AI described by OP?
Anthony Phillips
At some point, machinery will transcend capitalism into mechanical socialism before humans develop organic socialism. Eventually, human life will exceed that of machines.
This is just one of the many arguments against the use of machine intelligence by society. What would the future of intelligence look like if they were to be replaced by machines?
1. Machine intelligence is a danger for the planet
Some people are saying we should keep the machine intelligence. In my opinion, there are several reasons our current human evolution is wrong. First, the human species is not the only member of the animal world with an intelligent intelligence. In fact, the human species is the fifth most intelligent species on the planet.
Second, these people don't see the danger in replacing human species intelligence so often over the decades. Third, the risk
Mason Turner
How did Nietzche respond to Marx?
Marx was the author of a chapter on human beings in his The Communist Manifesto , titled What is Human Life like? A Critique . He saw the human body as the most important factor of economic existence, and wrote about being human with an acute, penetrating intellect. In the course of writing the chapter, he became interested in other ways to use technology, in particular electricity . He saw it as a sort of "holy grail of technology."
By studying the writings of the 18th-century French philosopher John Stuart Mill in The Human Condition , Marx saw Mill as his own personal philosopher. He also took notice of how Marx argued that humans are not completely separate from the environment — that we're a co-dependent social organism. He argued, for example, that if capitalism produces a lot of environmental stress and suffering
Evan Clark
How can we get to full communism ie. a post scarcity society safely and expediently with minimal disruption from society or the individual? How can we deal with environmental issues and climate change? Who holds the land? This is important to note because we're discussing global problems and not one country. The land, water and air systems are very complex systems and must be managed in the correct manner.
Another potential issue we run into: What if we need to move some or all of our resources from one resource base in one country to another? Which country? What will it take to reach that point?
So now we need to think of what we can do in a global perspective, in an effortless fashion; in a kind of global cooperation, where the world doesn't have to worry about one side of an issue but rather all of our issues co-determined in some logical and efficient manner and we can simply take an
Try the ai it's quite interesting The above was generated with
Bentley Murphy
How can we get to full communism ie. a post scarcity society safely and expediently with minimal disruption to the individual and society?
What are the problems with allowing capitalism to continue to flourish? How is it economically and socially necessary for us to have private property? Why do private property and profits come with a very high cost of production? Where does money come from? Why was money created? Why did we have to have money? Why did banks and governments regulate us? I want to understand these things.
I want to have a world where I am free to pursue my thoughts and ideas without coercion or threat. That's not free, that's enslavement.
