OH NONONONONONO

Didn't the Koch brothers supported shit like PragerU? (I know PragerU is just zionist neocon bullshit but it would probably be considered "extremist" by Soros, Google and big tech capital)

it's to fight left-wing extremism you dip

Do you really think these guys are going after the pro-market, pro-capitalist "throw leftists out of helicopters" people?

Tbh although historically fascism has been a tool of the bourgeoisie, and it will almost certainly be used the same way in the future, I think it’s fairly clear that this only happens under specific circumstances, mainly in response to a genuine communist or working class threat to their power. At the current juncture, when even socdems are scrambling to get their shit together, porky’s use for fascists is limited. Remember that fascists are apes, and ideologically committed ones at that. They often have a bull in china shop approach, and also believe themselves to be opposed to certain elements of the neoliberal world order such as free trade and supranational institutions (EU, world bank, IMF, etc) and if unleashed prematurely, can be a bigger headache than a benefit. Case in point, look at all the handwringing from corporate elites over Trump’s tariffs and trade spat with China. Therefore I would argue that actual fascists of the unironic Nazi and white nationalist variety (as opposed to the fash lite types like the Proud Boys, MAGA Chuds, etc) are at the current juncture, more of a liability than an asset to the establishment. That being said, I have no doubt that “anti-extremism” efforts will target the left with more zeal than the right, but to suggest that there aren’t at least elements within the establishment that see the far right as a threat to some of their interests is just false, at this juncture anyway.

Fascist Pigeon Screech got purged. Sargon thinks it's (somewhat) commies fault.

...