...
Can I be a communist if I hate people who are ugly and fat...
source?proof? No its not
By this logic we should accept pedophiles and zoophiles are much as homophiles and trannies
no u
stop making claims and refusing to prove them
that isn't something that you source cuck, it's a moral argument. If you call yourself "anti-lgbt" then that's an identity.
lmao the conflation, pedophiles and zoophiles both cause harm whether mental or physical whereas transsexuals don't.
Yes.
My proof is that you base your politics on identity. That means you're an idpoler as much as the Zig Forumsnigger basing his politics on racism.
You can't compare those at all. Whether a person identifies as trans or not does not affect children or animals or anyone else.
My proof is that America is not a country where a majority of the population is capitalist. Do you understand?
No its not. IDpol is that of choosing identity over class. Being anti LGBT can be done for idpol reasons but being anti lgbt because it is harmful to working class movements is not IDpol
proof?
Sorry, was that you saying that you're wrong? It's not good for you to get angry you know user.
Exactly like you say, their "ranking" - this is constructed by, mainly, capitalism. Hating people rather than capitalism is irrational, unproductive, blinds you towards how to achieve your goals, and is detrimental to your mental health and stability, which are crucial for any communist to retain their sharp critical thought.
Typical reactionary drivel.
The previous poster explained - just as racism is reactionary because it divides the working class, so is your anti-lgbt idpol.
Imagine thinking this is a clever argument. Hasn't the concept of consent crossed your tiny, feeble, ape-like brain? I swear you are so retarded any sexual contact with you is on par with rape, since your stupidity makes you incapable of understanding a concept as simple as consent. Moron.
All this is just Zig Forums tier internet edginess you have been force fed, use your fucking brain and get over your pitiful, teenage angst.
ok well i don't so you're wrong.
Whether a person identifies as pedo or not does not affect children or animals or anyone else.
but you can't prove that the people in the polls are majority proletariat.
you can't even prove that poll is correct.
nope
...
You do, so I'm right.
Correct. A pedophile who does not harm children does no harm to society.
I really don't know how to get this into your thick skull. If a majority of the population supports something, and the population consists of 90%+ working class, then that means that no matter what, that majority will be primarily working class.