Andy Ngo’s Expert Grievance Politics

Based soiboys with a medical/support team carrying anti-pepper spray material in a self propelled appropriated product of labor which was almost certainly seized under false pretense of it's use.

I've been arguing this for a while, actually. Trump's been only subversive on the surface level, but the truth is that the US is just a facade at this point so a surface level scratch is running the entire thickness of it.

The US is not and has never been interested in "securing oil" as much as they've been interested in maintaining an economic hegemony over governing the trading of oil between countries. They don't want oil, they're just the mafia members making sure they're getting their cut whenever someone starts trading in it in their town (Earth)

It's not oil per se but the petrodollar. The U.S. dollar remains the world's de facto currency. Accordingly, almost all oil sales throughout the world are denominated in USD. Because most countries rely on oil imports, they are forced to maintain large stockpiles of dollars in order to continue imports. This creates a consistent demand for USDs and ostensibly supports the USD's value, regardless of economic conditions in the United States.

Basically, as long as the U.S. continues to maintain its dominance of the global financial and economic system, thanks to the dollar, its supremacy as a world superpower is hardly questioned. Hence the U.S.-Saudi alliance and the impossibility for the U.S. to abandon this. The U.S. finances its own deficits this way by printing its currency, relying on its credibility as the world's reserve currency and supported by the petrodollar that requires other countries to store reserves of U.S. treasuries.

Attached: maxresdefault (4).jpg (1280x720, 35.14K)

Who?

The aggression against Iran also weakens this hegemony as European nations are joining Russia and China to disregard the ban on Iranian oil, they did abide by the Iran deal that was agreed upon. Why is it that Trump can do nothing to deliver on the promises that won him the election, but he can deliver on everything the jews want. He has effectively been a jewish supremacist president.

Which is being weakened by the policies pushed by the neocons and neolibs. Bombing the Middle-East and spreading yourself thin, and having a hyper focus on strengthening Israel is self-sabotage. Why can't these greedy hyper-capitalists just seem to adjust their priorities to their economic interest?

Oh, I know that. I just don't think they have the foresight to keep up with the demands of finance anymore. It's just part of a huge logical paradox that's forcing itself to come to resolution sooner or later. And just as importantly, it's a plan that worked over the last 30 years, they just don't have the sort of team they need to pull it off anymore.

Well, no Marxist ever said capitalism is anything but self-destructive. But you should know the Iranians consider this theory of petrodollar warfare as a fact and view that as how the United States operates. The way the whole sanctions thing Trump is doing against Iran right now is by threatening to sanction anyone who buys Iranian oil, as Iran exports oil but must sell it in dollars, and then uses those dollars to import the goods it needs. It's the control over international financial markets via the dollar that allows the U.S. do to this, atlhough Iran has loopholes like just hiding its exports in false-flag tankers with their transponders turned off and China will still buy it, but it's still a pain in the ass to do that and the Iranian economy does get squeezed pretty hard. Basically smuggling. The Iranians are tough though and they nut up and live through it.

He campaigned on supporting Israel to the hilt, moving the capital to Jerusalem, etc. I don't know what you expected. You should not read Zig Forums as that place is full of misinformation. Anyways, Trump's moves benefits Israel of course and that makes the Israel lobby in the U.S. happy, and brings Israel closer together with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. But it's just about business. This Jewish supremacist stuff is really a kind of ideological thing in your head that you need to justify what I suspect are your own ethno-nationalist politics, but that's dumb and ethno-nationalists are easily bribed and always have been. The Nazis got into power once and proceeded to blow themselves to smithereens but for the most part, in most countries, the far right rank-and-file are basically dupes for the big capitalists.

"nationalist" serves Isreal, well isn't this rare?
Stop spending time on Zig Forums you faggot, they literally circle jerk around every single zionist politician across the world

Also I should mention this because it's important, but the U.S. can't attack Iran directly. It's too big (the pops of Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria combined) and far more internally united. Iran also has a sophisticated and educated middle-income population, and gaining access to that via internal coup – instead of destroying that population – will be absolutely necessary to maintain global profitability generally by keeping down upward pressure on wages. The world capitalist economy needs to do that especially as China continues to develop, and Iran has a very young population and its working age population will double by 2050 – it might be to 100 million or so but I can't recall the exact numbers.

American nationalism / chauvinism – even when presented as "non-interventionist" or whatever – will always be reabsorbed back into bog-standard neoconservatism, which is the true and objective ideology of American nationalism / hegemony / and capitalist imperialism given the role of the dollar in the world economy, and the fact that capitalism has always required a hegemonic nation to prevent international competition from eroding the requirements of low wages to maintain capitalism's drive for growth.

Basically, you can't treat ideology as existing on this abstract plane divorced from networks of material relations, which is all there really is, mediated by social infrastructure (parliaments, highways, family structures and so on). What I'm saying is that individuals, governments, nations etc. don't actually exist in any kind of idealized sense. And the reason why nobody who gets elected can change anything is because they get elected within the social infrastructure of liberal bourgeois so-called "democracies" that do not allow for worker ownership or international cooperation that goes against these aforementioned requirements.

Watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=35DSdw7dHjs