Ø is pretty based, it became a party in 1989 as a merger of a whole bunch of radical left wing parties, from anarchists to MLs to greens. They lost a lot of bite over the years and are forced into discussing the mainstream points like immigration and climate change, but their program is still officially anti-capitalist, with talks about the means of production, wage labour, class struggle, imperialism etc. While they do engage in some idpol and call themselves a feminist party, they usually do it from a class perspective and not in the liberal sense. They are claiming that women's rights in Denmark are primarily a product of capitalists needing women in the labour pool, thus giving women economic independence (basically straight out of Lenin). And they support stuff like equal maternity leave for both parents (where it's only for women at the moment). They also have a really cool policy of not allowing any party members/employees to stay in the party for too long without going out and getting a job for a few years. I forget how long they are allowed to stay in the party and how long they have to be in the workforce. Oh, and they want out of NATO and EU. For a party with such views, it's quite amazing that they have gathered 6-8% of the votes in the last decade.
F used to be "democratic socialists", but now they only really cares about climate and welfare, which is fine, but not at all radical.
Daniel Robinson
...
Jaxon Perez
Any party that can get some functioning left unity going on is pretty based in my book. I read some of their articles and ideology in their website and they sound pretty decent, especially one article that denounced idpol as a weapon to undermine class consciousness.
But they seem too fixated on welfare and environment but I guess they are trying to push for a red government. I hope they change their rhetoric to labour and means of production soon. My own far left party should emulate Ø over say Podemos or Die Linke.
Mason Rogers
Got a link?
Daniel Lee
So if someone with a STEM graduate degree but a lot of student debt in their home country (from what I've seen to immigrate you need to prove solvency) showed up at Cuba or DPRK etc would they be allowed to stay?
Julian Moore
Based praxis
Lucas Martinez
Forget Cuba, just save up and go to Mexico. Just need $25k in bank balance or investments and they will give you a temporary residency visa (up to 4 years). Mexico has cheap housing (you just can't buy property 50km / 31mi from coastline as a non-citizen) and universal healthcare unlike USA.
David Ramirez
It would raise your odds of acceptance. Having real world work experience helps as well and I would imagine being part of a political party allied with WPK or CPC will boost your chances as well.
Brody Morales
Pretty capitalist, and there are some super super underdeveloped areas, particularly in the South (lel) but it is pretty nice to live in from what I hear. I have a Vietnamese migrant friend who still visits family there and I know someone who lives long term there in retirement. There is also shenanigans with China which I don't understand
Matthew Torres
They complain a lot about work since if you want to have a normal life there you have to work for Japanese or Chinese companies. One of my students was a 20 something guy working some IT shit for a Swedish company and he told me "My friends always ask me how to make good money, I tell them, just work for foreigners." Had some good laughs with him, iirc the food and alcohol prices are more or less on the level of shittier Eastern European countries (comparable with my Serbia).
