Military bases

if a war were to break out, how bad would we be with all of these base closures?

When you say "war", I'm going to assume you mean an act honest war against a "force equal" aggressor, not blowing up sand people; Shit, this is going to be a long post…

In the event of a large scale conflict these closures would greatly hinder us, it's force reduction, which is never a "good" thing, but on the economic side of the coin it would be a real industry boost (*insert something negative about the MIC here*). Since 91' we've tried folding multiple missions into singularities, be it with weapon systems, commands, ect… and it never works out for the better…unless you're the executive of a defense contractor who's billing the US Gov't $500K for an OTS part. (Seriously though, fuck any contractor post-1992, they went from developing and manufacturing start of the art, ground breaking systems to being corporate welfare leeches). The only smart move made by DoD post-1992 was moving some of our WRS out onto Ro-Ro, rather than in static locations we'd eventually lose due to capitulation of cucked politicians to anti-war/anti-nuke whining. So, at least we have war stock mothballed somewhere that is mobile, rather than just completely destroyed, which Congress loves to do. All that ammo destroyed years back, that was WRSA. Aame with all the 1911's, M9's, M1 Grands, M14's, M16's, ect… fed to Captain Crunch, all WRS that could have either been mothballed or surplused out for the commercial markets, but you can thank whiny ass anti-war groups and shitty companies that can't function with any real competition, all with the geriatric fucks in Congress. So, do away with any dreams you had about a Red Dawn scenario where crates of Vietnam-era M16s and pallets of M193 5.56 being air-dropped by the AF in your suburban neighborhood to help arm you in fighting off Ivan and Xi from driving deeper into CONUS.