Considering you can OC swords again in Texas I wholeheartedly support this.
Texas Legislative Alert
Elijah Martin
Owen Evans
Without duel laws, the swords are nothing else than props that make you look like a retard/LARPer
It's as if you had conceal carry, but the police arrests you if you ever use it to defend yourself.
Charles Stewart
Maybe if you suck their dicks a bit harder you'll be arrested last.
Levi Ramirez
That's what anglos wanted, so whatever.
Also, can't you get arrested in Korea for questioning the virtue of comfort women, or disrespecting women in general?
Jace Perry
I'm not Korean. My VPN changes every time I get a new Tor circuit. That's probably true though. Seems like you can be arrested anywhere if you hold any beliefs the government declares to be doubleplusungood. And of course, when the state hands down the order the police will obey like good little lapdogs. Like a stereotypical Frankenstein's assistant.
"Yes master, anything for you master. Your wish is my command. Abuse the people? Strip them of their rights? Massacre them? Anything for you, O master! Hand over my firstborn child? Without question, master! Protect murderers and the corrupt? I live to serve you, my master! Just so long as I can keep my pension, I am your willing slave, O great one!"
Liam Hernandez
I'm just waiting until ZOG reopens auschwitz for antisemites (^:
Aaron Butler
I also wish duels made a comeback even if I'm a scrub myself. However actual duels relied on people valuing their honor and reputation. You really think faggot politicians will actually take you up on a duel? They'll just refuse and flood the media with PR noise.
Joseph Brooks
Also duels are already a thing, it's called "mutual combat". Good luck getting anyone agree to one.
Camden Roberts
I envision it as modified legislation to "brawl" in penal code. But instead of police coming to break it up, they charge both participants a fee (that's returned to the winner) and handle any potential bets while also being an impartial judge.
Refusing a duel after starting shit is a crime with a forced labor sentence of up to a year.
Brandon Robinson
How do you determine who actually started shit? Say Douchebag McGee and his buddy posse find some average Joe, surround him in an alley, and force him under penalty of getting the shit kicked out of him/being FUCKING MURDERED into issuing a duel challenge. Now, Douchebag has been hitting the gym and taking up boxing for at least a year because he thinks he can make a career out of this. Joe is an accountant. The day of the duel, Joe has to show up under penalty of jail time and having a felony on his record, which could affect his employment. He tried to appeal to the court that he was forced into this by threats, but Douchebag's posse testify that he insulted and challenged Douchebag first, and would you look at that, they're the only witnesses, too bad :). The fight comes around, and Douchebag beats/murders the shit out of Joe (depending on whether you have duels to the death or just to surrender) while his buddies have been seeding the town beforehand with rumors that Joe is secretly a back alley brawler while Douchebag is working off an ankle and wrist injury. As a result, the posse makes off with a sizable pot, while Joe is stuck nursing not only his wounds, but the malice from the community of those who bet on him and lost their wagers. Some internet commando sits back in his chair with a smug smile having read the newspaper report on the duel's outcome and thinks to himself "Finally, a judicial system that works."