The year is 2028...

Samefag

Not sure why that user has you so upset.

Waco was successful though?

Assuming that you managed to get a militia up and running that well without getting Partyvanned
[User was MOAB-ed for this post]

yes

Attached: ND6fFvd.jpg (4320x3240, 669.39K)

Need to rename that pic to the tenth crusade.

A Phyrric Victory, though, if there was mass gun grabbing? It was already a disaster with as many casualties as they took and the public images of civilians being killed in the final assault, if anything that and Ruby Ridge kinda put the water on the fire of gun confiscation in the US. They sure did disarm and destroy the cult of whackos with guns; now do it again, 100 or 1,000 or 10,000 times. At some point without the military you'll run out of ATF and FBI agents, morale will plummet, public outcry will start to become louder and louder. Agents will be killed, innocent people in crossfire will be killed, the whole thing will have its many "victories" just like Ruby Ridge was 'victorious" and Waco was "victory", until the whole fiasco just comes to a close. People will lose stomach or it will ignite a full blown rebellion that might topple those in power.

80,000,000 gun owners at least in the US, even if only 0.1% of those end up with Ruby Ridgeesque endings that could be 80,000 incidents. Maybe 80,000 gun battles. Watcha gonna do if 8,000 or even only 800 agents get killed in these ham fisted confiscation attempts? It would be akin with a small war even if no militias or organized resistance or open rebellion hit, long term casualties would take a morale toll and eventually manpower for the services invovled.

Just like Phyrrus, "Another victory like that will ruin us"

I always preferred the A2 style stock on a dissipator.

That is the only mistake in your post, apart from that 11/10.

The police are a tool. The goal is to make the transition as seamless as possible for the general population. I'm not there to extort or exploit them, as I'm not a leftist. I'm there to defend our shared second amendment rights. Remember that this town is heavily R, and the SWAT teams the feds and states will use will likely involve local assets in addition to their shit, which means local incidents and risks for the local police. A small county sheriff office with ~50 personnel, most of which aren't police officers but desk jockeys, aren't going to bite the bullet for the feds, and the feds will likely start in the rural areas since that's where most "gun nuts" people with militarily effective weapons live.

In short, the local police aren't going to be a problem if you choose the right place to make a stand. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if some sheriffs actually stood up for the 2nd against the feds. But if they do cause problems, you have 50+ men and, presumptively, the local population. Its always better to break bread then break skulls, especially if you just made yourself an enemy of the state in the last 6 hours.

Good thing I never registered my firearms in the first place.