We should start digging for any online presence of Bowers before January. It's possible he's the profile of an FBI agent who trained at the exercise and then went undercover to set up this attack later. Remember that the FBI were responsible for Parkland, with the Broward County police's help.
1639
Ethan White
Brandon Moore
Half of population living in greater Seattle and greater Portland metropolitan areas means pretty heavy urbanization.
More compact cities become, more urbanized those are. Most of US cities and metropolitan areas aren't really urban, US cities tend to suburban sprawls.
Cooper Myers
Use for future reference.
Lincoln Rogers
read this, afterwards come back and tell us why YOU hate the kikes.
einsamerkrieger.wordpress.com
have fun nigger
Aiden Lopez
Stay. Washington state will turn red soon enough, with so much white flight throughout the country :^)
Bentley Garcia
You get used to the heat eventually.
It's like you're not even trying. Anyways, the white man settled Texas because Mexico was offering vast amounts of excellent farmland for a very cheap price. Best state in the Union, if you cut out the cuck wastelands.
Carter Reyes
So if you're required to keep guns in a safe, how does it actually work? If you forget the gun for 5 minutes outside the safe are you a felon now? What about 1-2 days? Or is it just more of a "usually keep in safe" thing? If you get prosecuted couldn't you just claim you had it out temporarily and was about to put it back? That would reduce it from "must keep gun in safe" to merely "must have a safe". I mean, it doesn't say anything about safe policy compliance, nor could it, since trying to limit how much you can have your gun out of your safe is probably enough of a 2A violation that even cucked scotus will strike it down.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Anyway, good safes are very expensive (more than a gun), heavy (if renting landlord might forbid it) and often must be mounted to wall (again if renting you're fucked). Not everyone has room for a safe. Your credit card, checkbook, car keys, ID, tax returns, kitchen knives could be just as dangerous if stolen (both to you and the public), but you don't keep them in a safe do you?
You jest, but what is really the difference? By having a "safe" requirement, I presume the government means to say "keep the gun in a locked, secure place where only you have access". Well, how is a house different from a safe (assuming you live alone)? Isn't a house already locked and secure such that only you have access? I mean sure you can have guests over, but you can also open your safe to guests, it doesn't say you can't.
You might say "well a house is easy to break into, just smash the window". Neglecting that this amounts to the government admitting its own utter impotence at upholding rule of law and stopping petty crime, safes can be broken into too. In fact, AFAIK these laws don't really have requirements on the "safes", so presumably a tin box with "SAFE" etched on it and a shitty chinesium lock is good enough… So what security benefit do we have here? What a retarded law.
I consider 90s unusually cool weather for half the year. Try 110s for most of summer (which starts in march and ends in october). This morning was fucking 55 and we're in December ffs. And that's a record cold.
Like hell you do. Maybe some people do but if you're very cold-adapted enjoy being soaked in sweat 5 secs after stepping outside. Won't even mention the sunburns.
Were they even charging money? I thought they were giving it away just to have people here. The whole state was so fucking depopulated that it only took 40,000 gringos moving in to suddenly become the overwhelming majority.
Juan Jenkins
Moses Austin, Stephen F Austin's father, asked Spain for land so he can sell it to the Anglos in America to stop Anglo illegal immigrants and to populate Texas. Moses died and so did Nuevo Espana viceroyalty, so Stephen asked the Mexican government who gave free land to land agents to bring 200 families, and those land agents would presumably sell the land to the families. So yes and no, they were giving the land free to the land agents but the land agents were selling the land to the Anglo families, for a very cheap price of course. Oh and the immigrants had to become Mexican citizens, learn Spanish, obey Taco Law (meaning no slaves), and become Catholics. As we all know, that shit didn't happen. Texas was pretty barren, only the injuns and 3,500 beaners were around. Lesson to be learned, you can't let a group of people mass migrate and outnumber your native population and expect them to assimilate.
Ethan Moore
Ah, the (((middleman))) strikes again.
Tbh, I don't see the problem with Tejanos, same as I don't see the problem with muh whites stealin injun land. If the invading culture is literally superior might as well let it happen, you're better off being flooded. What's happening today is very different. It's not a bunch of self-sufficient, principled people coming to barren land to tame the wilds and civilize it. It's the shittiest hobos and criminals of a shitty country coming to urban centers of a better country to leech off the welfare system and diversity quotas, who try to make their new home even worse than the shithole they escaped, let alone improving it.
Colton Young
Tejanos are one thing, spics running over from Oaxaca is another. As for one culture being superior to another, old school Mexican culture wasn't too different from the old Spanish culture. That being said I still believe Anglo-Texan/Dixie culture and people are the best in the entire world, that's not why we beat out the beans.