Don't receive from an extraordinary minister (i.e., the normal laypeople who are giving out the eucharist) and DON'T receive from female extraordinary ministers. Receive from priest or deacon, and receive on tongue.
If you can't receive from priest or deacon, receive it on the tongue or hand, in my opinion, according to your personal discretion.
Pardon me, I was being unclear. What I meant to say in the last sentence is, if you LITERALLY can't access the priest, then receive begrudgingly from Extraordinary Ministers, and receive it on the tongue if you think they know how to do it, or on hand if you feel that's more appropriate. Never do the full kneel to someone who is not a priest, in my opinion.
Plain wrong. Have you ever seen an actual conservative Mass of the ordinary form ? Because according to what you're saying you didn't as you're solely repeating schismatic memes over and over. It is precisely called the ordinary form of the Mass of the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church. Nothing more and nothing less. Whenever you purposefully repeat "novus ordo", you're purposefully disrespecting Pope Benedikt XVI. and the whole of the Church. Also
Of course. Keep your delusion to yourself, please, this is a thread about the Holy Eucharist.
Shitting up a good thread on purpose and out of malicious intent and being angry at the people shitting up a good thread is the same now. I see. Again, gtfo if you have nothing to contribute.
And why is that ? Apparently the Church is allowing it - obviously. Why would you consider yourself smarter than the scholars and lawyers of the Church ? You know where that extraordinary minister-thing comes from, right ? From a lack of ordained people. So what you could do is advise people to join the seminary rather than giving people advice on a matter that is absolutely clear as per Church. Furthermore, are you even an actual believing Catholic ? Because you don't - you NEVER - receive the Holy Eucharist that is CHRIST begrudgingly, no matter the reason as long as the person handing it out is authorized and approved to do so ? You should be rejoicing to be able to do so.
I don't see an anathema attached to saying novus ordo so I will still say it. I have a feeling this is going to be one of those things where the term keeps having to be changed to not be offensive because the underlying principal itself is bad, just like how technical labels for the disabled are changed.
It does matter how you receive for in matters of worship Everything matters and there is a perfect way to worship.
Why don't easterns, Assyrians and orientals kneel or genuflect or profound bow before the Eucharist? In the Latin rite laity are strongly recommended to do a sign of adoration to the eucharist. Do other rites not do this?
You called the SSPX Hitler, you don't belong here.
That was a quote by Paul VI
Again, I can only speak for the Byzantines here.
Kinda hard to genuflect when receiving from a spoon.
But also, genuflecting is a uniquely Latin tradition. That's about it. Others have their own ways of being reverent toward the Eucharist.
Also, we already bow before the Eucharist during the epiklesis.
come on now
Op here. I received communion on my knees and on the tongue. Should I receive the blood on my knees too though? I genuflected and then drank it standing.
Want to be a good Catholic but do not like the Vatican 2 heresies? Go to a Tridentine Latin Mass. Its the traditional RCC mass that was created as a response to The 2nd Vatican council.
Sure, the Latin may be intimidating but most Churches will have pamphlets that translates the Latin prayers and the Homily will be in your native language.
The Vatican also recognizes Latin Mass to be in Communion with the RCC. Something to look into, OPanon