On Conquest

Destroying unbelievers IS GOOD.

Attached: taking_of_jerusalem.jpg (500x286, 38.78K)

you know your argument is bad when even your cherry picked verses dont support it. That command to exterminate the Caananites is a one off command. God gives many one off commads, like Noah to build the arc. It does't mean everyone has to build arcs.

I don't even know why I'm arguing with some Zig Forumsyp who is trying to use the Bible to promote genocide. It's pretty obvious from the lack of support by any Christians ever, that genocide is not a Christian thing to do.

Think about what you just said.
Just war.
Breaking peace against unbelievers so they won't screw you first is literally islamic warcode.

t. guy who's country actually fought muslims in the middle ages.

Attached: You dropped this sir _0cdd654f1a0acee92a84de01a6b277cc.png (384x288, 105.57K)

But allowing degeneracy to fester and corrupt, not only nations, but the clergy sworn to defend the laity is Christian?

Did Jesus fight back against undue aggression? Are you telling me he was fundamentally immoral?

Look man. Nobody reasonable would tell you that you are required to let foreign invaders kill you. You have a duty to protect yourself, your family, and your neighbor. I understand that nobody likes the literal slave religion Islam, but even the middle east had a healthy community of Christians until we decided that we'd prop up the Holocaustians in their fake little Israel. The Muslim nations were trapped in a perpetual Iron Age because they constantly eat themselves and each other. Our efforts to show them away out of that absurd cycle through Christ might have been well under way were it not for this current sad chapter of history. Escalating things at this point will only feed Israel further. They'll wither and die without the constant war aid our goon politicians keep feeding them because the country is an absolute turd. Why do you think they keep staging false flag attacks? The conflict feeds them.

It does actually, whenever there is a flood you should build an arc. Just the same, whenever there is an unbeliever you should genocide.
Christianity is eviscerated in the tolerant West, gay pride and transsexualism is rampant. Your views are an utter failure, you have no argument indeed.

Attached: 13353_862364043824027_3577948761410441743_n.jpg (960x639, 107.1K)

This is exactly the opposite though. I could understand why one would be completely justified in taking down the forces of evil that threaten the continued existence not only of himself but of Christendom in the region, but what if you are the aggressor? Is it right to come knocking down on an infidel's door just because his kind have looked at you funny and you don't want to be on the wrong end of a broadsword in a few years' time?
Or what if it's against people of an entirely different race that still want you dead, but not directly so?

Kind of a LARPer's answer, yeah
I'm talking more of a situation where live and let live is not applicable, such as with those races killing the Boers or the Chosen People, I certainly don't think that enslaving some Tibetan monks is the right thing to do.

That's kind of disingenuous though because Christianity evolved as a religion since its inception, also I'd like some sources on that second fastest growing religion thing.

May I get some academic insight on why even the asses should not be spared? Or rather were they places of high Christian persecution? Keep in mind that I don't really buy into that whole "if you atac enemi you bad gui :((" kind of jazz but I don't feel that the indiscriminate punishment of innocents is righto either.

You didn't do a very good job at it, since in percentages there's now more muslims than ever.

Because GOD COMMANDS IT! Asking for reasons before obeying God is cryptoatheism.