Gee I wonder what happened in the forties that lead to a lowering of the mean marriage age
Celibacy Revolution
I live in Japan and the average working day at my office is 14-18 hours a day 5 days/week (for an officially 40 hours/week job). If you want a real job in Japan you have to be willing to give up your entire life for it. If you want any free time at all you have to take a job that doesn't pay enough to actually survive on. The cost of living here is high. You can't survive on your own off a minimum wage or parttime job. That's why people give up and live off their parents. The choice is either work 60-80 hours/week or be a neet with no real option in between.
Peer, o mere mortal, into western society's future
being this
>>>/mgtow/
Yeah, it's pretty sad. It's annoying how everyone likes to ignore facts to pat each other on the back about how correct they are and how wrong everybody else is. The Posts that directly follow your are a good example.
Even if they were single digits, or fractions of a percent, they would appear.
And as i said, they do appear, but you WILLFULLY CHOOSE TO IGNORE THE REAL DATA.
Look at the corrected graph.
They are 8-9% of the female population.
Men are a few percentages higher, as has always been the case for these types of statistics, from sex to reproduction, for as has long as we have collected this data.
But as i said, you faggots willfully ignore the real data, and cling to bugged-up graphs even the author has deleted from this tweet timeline, and word-of-mouth urban myths like
, because it feeds your narrative.
bestest timeline
In the same way that the Soviet Famines in the Ukraine ushered in a golden age of temperance and defeat of gluttony
That's the whole point, 1/1000 or 1/10000 would not appear on a graph.
I know they exist, but their appearance is statistically insignificant.
That's the whole shocker.
What's the difference between the two graphs in terms of population?
I mean why was the first one deleted?
Are you in Tokyo?
0,0something% of anything is too low a number for ANYTHING in a population, beyond weird genetic stuff.
Its 8-9%.
If that percentage was an ethnic minority with a political party in a country, itd be used as a political kingmaker.
Its literally the same population, you dumbass.
Weird calculation error, and the author prefered not keeping a wrong graph on the internet, to be mistakenly sourced.