scotusblog.com
tldr: New York City only lets people take their guns to and from the city's shooting ranges. They even ban people from taking them out of the city to other ranges, to hunt, or to go to property owned by the owner. If you have a gun in NYC with a premises license, you legally can't move the gun outside of your home, unless going to the seven ranges in NYC. The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association sued them. The district court and 2nd Court of Appeals claimed the ban isn't unconstitutional as Heller only referenced guns inside the home and it is a reasonable law to "support public safety." SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, but no date has been set yet. We'll likely get their ruling next spring. They'll most likely rule that "and bear arms" is a thing, due to the conservative majority. Ideally, it'll be done in a way that'll either make shall-issue the standard (due to NYC's permits being almost impossible to obtain; John Stossel even couldn't get anything higher than a premises license despite citing dozens of death threats) or make nationwide reciprocity a thing (due to NYC needing both a NY state and NYC carry permit and almost no other neighboring state honoring it, making it almost impossible to transport the gun to other states, violating the Full Faith and Credit Clause). Of course, SCOTUS could just rule NYC is retarded, make them allow free movement of guns, yet not expand Heller in any meaningful way, but we can dream.
South Dakota now has Constitutional Carry
Jordan Foster
Robert Allen
That's only state contractors. (((ACLU))) are suing at the moment, they're probably going to win.
Ian Robinson
Gorsuch is a leftard who ended felony deportations and kavanaugh is on record saying he wants to rule as narrowly as possible on any given case. We're fucked.