No the surface of it literally burns, chars like coal. The google is ruined afterward, it can't be reused.
Defence against laser weapons
Joshua Ramirez
Isaiah Reyes
you're one to talk, beaner
Aiden Adams
Beans r bedder then burgers mutt
Jaxon Perez
Laser weapons are kind of shit. Try to keep even a powerful laser pointer still on a moving target from 200m+. You'd need an extremely stable tripod being constantly moved and shined in a soldiers eyes. One laser only being able to "dazzle" one soldier.
The longer the distance, the more particles in the way of the beam such as dust, sand shit. So you'd need a bulky stand for each laser while remaining covered at a short enough distance.
Leo Hughes
Xavier Davis
All you guys are retards, everyone knows that lasers are easily defeated by pic related
Jayden Gomez
Can you give brand/model of the glasses that you use?
Jackson Baker
Laser/Dazzle attacks have been a military concern since the late-50's and have for the most part been mostly mitigated. A laser/dazzle attack against an civilian is unlikely, leaning more to an improbability. The most likely target is aircraft, followed by electro-optics on aircraft/buildings/equipment/vehicles and individual weapons sights/scopes/magnified optics. All military hardware has a LIF/LPF coating or have a LIF/LPF insert that can be applied, ex. the M17, M40/42/45, and M50 all have LIF overlens, nearly all combat sights have a LIF/LPF incorporated into their design or can be fitted with one, all NVG post-PVS-5 have LIF/LPD inserts, as do most MIL-STD binoculars. Now you can purchase sunglasses design to function as LIF/LPF from Laser Armor, as well as LIF/LPF adapters for weapons sights like the TA91.
Liam Smith
Coating and filters don't cover all wavelength also high-power lasers can damage coatings. Even they they save eyes/cameras optical device still becomes nonoperational. Filters are mostly against collateral damage of teh laser rangefinders against dedicated laser weapons they are weak. Main protection against laser weapons is international treaties.
Actually ""'less then lethal' dazzlers for crowd control is new hot items for LE and military across the world.
Mason Diaz
This particular defense is 93% efficient. How much thermal power would it take to melt it? Divide by reciprocal of 0.93 to find out minimum laser power requirement.