Militarized Container ship

Tiny planes.

This is indeed possible

As has been mentioned, this is probably the most retarded idea. They're large, slow, unarmored, and the furthest thing from "maneuverable", but to entertain kookygook's wacky ideas…look into bulk carriers, as they already have built in holds with hatches to hide things. A lot also come with cranes, which could come in handy.

Also, there's too many logistical nightmares to tend to: no port in the world is going to let you in without some kind of company sponsor, company in that country with agents to represent you on shore, and of course orders from a completely different company to carry a load for. You think ships just fucking sail into a port all willy nilly whenever they want? You also probably won't be able to find a "natural" harbor that will accommodate those 40-55m draft monstrosities ala pirates in ye olde Caribbean.

In summation, you would be better served building your own fleet of E-Boot to Torpedoboot sized ships, and outfitting them with whatever bullshit you can buy from eastern Europe, the Balkans, and Africa.

Dude we are assuming a country and its military budget are our main sponsor.

This is no PMC force.

yeah but their ports are even arger and have bigger industrial capacity then the rest of the world, nothing stopping them from just grabbing conteiner ships and doing the same to them, faster, for less

Attached: jazda.webm (854x480, 6.54M)

China whole stick about "silk road" isn't about sea trade. It's about land trade.
De facto China and Russia control most of the planet land masses with most of the population and most of the resources.
They don't give two fucks about "blue" sea trading especially transpacific, what they care at most is the control of the one road coastal navigation but if push come to shove they could forgo sea trade entirely, which is why they're building and investing tremendously in new, power-grids, railways and highways to secure land connections.

One of the reasons for the US to back the Kurds could be to prevent a land connection from Europe to China via Turkey.

Attached: One_Belt_One_Road.png (863x712, 60.46K)

Not much has changed from the days of Halford Mackinder, the US merely inherited it's position from the British Empire.

You can pack them with explosives, sink a squadron of them at a set distance to hostile shores, then detonate them in sequence to create an artificial tsunami.

Attached: projectseal.png (951x1300 1.41 MB, 153.67K)

The Silk Road is not a fast way to transport goods.

I used to work in textile, the chinks prefer naval transportation first and foremost.

If you block and destroy all the ports, you will effectively shut down at least 30 to 60% of China goods.

Genocide all kebabs in between China and Europe and replace them with chinks and the Silk Road becomes their most cost effective trade route.