Bread Pilling Zig Forums et. al

What I mean by "recreate" I mean recreate it.

It is natural for humans to create thundergods and co pretty much every time, doesn't matter where you go, if it thunders then they have a thundergod of some description.
Or at least a spirit or something.

What does not happen is someone recreating Christianity just like that.
Nothing else needs to be said about this.

These things do not need missionaries, they happen to any people left alone to their own devices with their natural ability, their soul, to connect with the world.

You're going to have to put your back into it to get your fruity redefinition of what truth is to stick.
Zero. Ultimate truth can not be arrived at by non-ultimate beings. Christianity is revelation, not deduction or invention.

You're forgetting one tiny little detail: the Pandora's Box of science that has been opened and cannot ever be closed again.

Eventually, on their own, humans arrived at the truth that snow is not the product of Mother Holle shaking out her bed set, but rather the ice crystals that precipitate in Earth's atmosphere. On their own, humans arrived at the truth that thunder is not the product of a bearded man throwing a hammer or a metal bolt towards the Earth, but shock waves caused by sudden bursts of thermal expansion in the clouds. Even if you theoretically got your hands on something like an Infinity Gauntlet and snapped your fingers and made all books and knowledge disappear and send all of humanity back into the stone age to prove your point, humans would eventually develop back towards arriving at this scientific model of the universe. And a scientific model of the universe, with multiple complex natural systems working together in tandem and harmonious order, does not point towards a bunch of personified natural phenomenon squabbling about.

Even modern pagans, whether they're trying to recreate their gods and worldview loosely or as tightly as possible from books and research, have fallen to trying to adapt their beliefs to the scientific model. Whether it be viewing their gods as Jungian archetypes, or deified ancestors, or tulpas/egregores, or trying to interpret the realms of ice and fire meeting over Ginnungagap as being a metaphor for The Big Bang, or just throwing their hands up and just saying "Heck with it: sure it's all a bunch of stuff our forbearers made up to explain what they did not understand, or to convey the worldview of their culture, but muh heritage!"

But do you know what is actually compatible with the scientific model? What could actually account for a complex network of systems working together in such beautiful harmony? A monotheistic creator. As the idiom goes: "take a sip from the cup of natural sciences and you will initially be an atheist. Drink that cup all the way to the bottom, however, and you will arrive at God. And wouldn't you know it. The Egyptians, Indians, and Middle Easterners were beginning to arrive at this truth by the Late Bronze Age.

All on their own.

No. I hate communism with a vengeance, but if you believe cozying up with the Atomwaffen Division is better, you got another thing coming.

And you believe occultists, pagans and atheists are better?

But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;

6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;

10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:

[b]11 For there is no respect of persons with God.[/b]
Romans 2:5-11

You aren't bringing them to a closer understanding of shit.
You are just showing them some theologians weren't big fans of the jews.
But given they already quote Luther and Calvin pretty often on the subject, but i'm not seeing any of them lining up to join those churches, so it wont change their hearts.

Yeah, no.
It's still humans that make this shit.
You can dismantle them just as well(personally, i'm keeping an eye on a certain far-left project that was popular a decade ago, to make sure it dies well).
No one gets a safe pass.

By being the channer version of that loser that tries to impress popular kids by imitating their clothing and sucking up to them, so maybe they will invite him to hang out sometimes?

And where is Christ in all this?
You have literally made our faith a spiritual window dressing.
Again, that traditionalism could be wrapped up in shintoism(like Japan), or the Imperial Cult, or atheistic reactionary larping, for all it matters.
The apostles didn't get sent to make sure we wear national costumes once a year, do some festivals to honor muh ancestors, and not let a lot of foreigners in.
They got sent to preach Christ, and baptise the nations.
Any cultural benefit resulting from that was incidental spiritual grace, like nice leaves on a vine.

Not really.
Most of those are copy-pasted off neighboring mythology, or imposed by invaders, in case of PIE cultures.

Attached: tumblr_oqq4erxWHz1trlzg7o10_r1_500.gif (500x208, 2.48M)

You are just over-interpretating ONE of all the arguments against anti-christian rethoric of Zig Forums.

Now if you have better arguments feel free to use them, find quotes or make memes. It doesn't invalidate the validity of the argument of showing them the theological reality of the difference between jews and christians and hebrews.

Someone can do as Pius XII did, condemn modern deviations of nazism and condemning anti-racism in the same text, and even preparing a text against jews. I don't really see your argument against showing the theological reality.

Because, again, if this idiotic campaign had been effective, Zig Forums would have been filled with edgy calvinists and lutherans by now.

there is not only protie quotes first
then I don't really see a campaign.
and in the end I don't care if most Zig Forumsacks stay edgy, what matter is the fighting of error, it will lead the ones who want to Truth.

Ok.
Then the same answer. but with those quotes's denoms, as well.
Not officially, but it's
You are cuddling a highly influenceable snake, because you believe it has good intentions, and thinking it won't turn around and bite you, despite acknowledging they have loosed all their venom on us before, by simply being nudged slightly.

*but given how much they have been resposted, it's a lowkey version of it.