Dish is Hiring an Investigator to Research and Monitor Pirates

right now, I'm painting a canvas for a client. I'm a commercial artist, a freelance illustrator. I'm not a 'gallery artist's because I dont sit around creating art for no reason, hoping somebody will eventually purchase it. creating art is my occupation. it's a business.

when you're a commercial artist, the client almost always has the concept already in mind (although it's my job to make their concept as creative as possible) and 90% of the time, the 'creative quality' of their concepts is lacking…. but that's part of the job…

all too often, I have no choice but to create content im not particularly proud of, from a creative point of view….

but it's not free….

An artist is defined by his motivation to express himself. He uses his talent to get a message across. You on the other hand use your talent to "make it", which translates to you desperately trying to find a way to fuck the rest of humanity over by getting access to easy money. As for copyright…the second you "make it" you'll be drowned in money, money you received for selling out the rights to your art. From there on out you're a golden goose that gets squeezed until it dries out. Artists under capitalism are slaves to greed and their output is worthless…proven by the point that once the marketing stops nobody gives a shit about the artist anymore.

We are indeed entitled to be entertained. The profession of artists was only accepted in the productive world, because they entertain the rest. That's the only thing they can contribute. Capitalistic greed corrupted this process into an industry that destroys creativity. For example…Disney created his fortune by using (called stealing nowadays) other peoples works (Arabian Nights, Brothers Grimm, every fable ever written etc.) to create his works. In the present the same Disney is responsible for robbing mankind of the ability to create art out of past creations. Imagine a world where the kikes would put copyright on FIRE…nobody could use it without paying out of their asses for it. Can you imagine how damaging that would be for the future?

Greed itself took care of this one as well by corrupting laws and making it nearly impossible for upstarts to create anything without selling their right away. Your only way is to be a slave to the system and be scrupulous enough to find a loophole so you can cheat, rob and back stab yourself into a position of power.

And I personally couldn't give any lass of a shit if you (or anybody else) likes my art or not, because for every person who hates it, there's someone who thinks it's amazing.

big deal…. either opinion means nothing, because I got paid for it, and that's the reason I created it….

nobody 'owes you' your entertainment.

you're not entitled to jack shit

torrenting is theft

fuck yourself, bitch

go make your own fucking movies

says the talentless video game
watching little boy trapped
in the sedentary body
of an adult male

…..and you've experienced this WHEN?

stfu

'somebody' is transferring their frustration due to their lot in life, and mapping it onto everything

Come on, Neptune…you're smarter than this. How many times have you gauged the prices of your paintings? You wanted to get rich, didn't you? Nevermind that you blew it all away, but you know how damaging right holders can be to an artist. And if you multiply those damages into the upper echelon of capitalism, you have to see how mankind itself gets destroyed in the process. Copyright is cancer to art. Plain and simple.

Attached: Yep it's me again..jpg (281x417, 19.84K)

ART :
the tumor attached to a healthy copyright

I parry this right back with the pharma industry. How can you defend copyright, when in this world a criminal institution can hold the rights on lifesaving drugs? Holding those rights to corrupt doctors into selling questionable drugs for profit or purposely creating addicts by playing the market like a drug cartel? (you've read about the Oxycontin scheme over the last decades, didn't you?).

when I was working for ZZ TOP, I was in a unique contractual agreement between Lone Wolf Records and Warner Bros. Records, with the added benefit of corporate sponsorship by Miller Beer….

let me explain this arrangement….

Lone Wolf Records was the ALBUM LABEL, who actually recorded the music, and had PUBLISHING RIGHTS to the music.

A lot of people think Warner Bros. creates movies, TV shows and music… THEY DON'T….

Warner Bros. is a DISTRIBUTOR

other companies create the movies, TV shows & music, then Warner Bros. distributes the content worldwide.

Bill Ham was ZZ TOPs manager. he wasn't in the band, even though he was also a musician. the band ZZ TOP were the artists, and Bill was a master of managing artists. he made tons of money by making ZZ TOP very, very wealthy.

Bill created a unique position for me, where every dollar I received from Lone Wolf Records was simultaneously matched by Warner Bros. Records, and when Miller Beer was the corporate sponsor, they also had to match my fee dollar for dollar….

I was getting paid THREE TIMES simultaneously…. that's the Art Of The Deal, and I wasn't complaining….

Bill decided to venture into the art of movie making, and he set up a corporation named Lone Wolf Films…

I was paid to create the 3D computer animated opening Logo Sequence (much like the horse with wings for TriStar) which I created with precision…

there was a problem……

the Lone Wolf logo was very very similar to the Wolf Films logo owned by Dick Wolf, creator of Law & Order, etc

Attached: tmp_16702-7492221f93617480a60cc2cab3c602761897325290.png (320x189, 19.13K)