Pre-Adamites

...

There are human skeletons that are 100,000 years old.

And how far would you march that back?

Attached: Little Foot.jpg (992x488 569.51 KB, 41.03K)

I'm not following your question, fossilposter.

According to whom are they human?

The skeletons of the """people""" I'm speaking of were basically the same as ours. I theorize that Adam was the first human to have a godly soul. All the others before him were animal people.

What do you consider human or non?

Attached: wt15000.jpg (287x777, 29.94K)

What do you mean "before him" though. If you mean Adam wasn't formed from the dust, you'd be contradicting again.

Just because the judeo-secular religion demands there be evolution of life from a common origin doesn't mean you need to believe it. I certainly don't, because it's contradictory. They're wrong about reality.

THERE IS ALREADY A CONTAINMENT THREAD FOR YOU. LEAVE THERE

So you think God "magicked" Adam into existence from dirt? You don't think maybe Adam is a development based on previous work?

We'll say the same next time you post an icon in an unrelated thread. Deal?

The only reason someone would want to think that was, they were being pressured to conform to the judaic belief in the evolution of life from a common origin.

If they say that such things are impossible, it doesn't affect me. They also say for someone to rise again from the dead and for them to ascend into heaven is impossible.