nah, i hold the true catholic faith, just not roman falsely-so called catholic. im a biblicist.
well-stated, although i reject flatly about 99% of your assumptions and therefore cannot comment on it except selectively. until i see ropes stretched around the necks of the bodies in which their defiled souls reside, you ARE complicit. as i said in another thread, the us government has never accomplished any of their stated goals. more than the likely the state is colluding with the vatican (as it has been for the last 1700 years) to make a show that they are doing something to calm the laity (you) down because they think that you are too stupid to see that they are playing you. question is whether or not the laity is going to fall for it yet again. my prediction? absolutely. no reason to think anything will change.
They aren't really assumptions, they're what's going on right now based on released information, and the logical consequences from that.
I don't think that's been a problem with the US. At least any change would be relatively recent. There's a very strong anti-Roman tradition in the US, in the 19th Century political parties took up anti-papist positions on the regular, concern over external interference, helped in large part by there only being large Catholic populations in two states: Maryland and Louisiana. And the latter of those was a slave state during the Civil War, so Washington had plenty of opportunity to actively ignore them or shoot people from there. You certainly had (on the other side) official proscriptions on the nation from popes, in terms of accusations of Freemasonry, even specifically calling democratic liberalism "Americanism".
The state of affairs mainly changed with the 20th Century, when more immigrants came in who were Catholic, to the point where they started coming in numbers that could swing elections, the watershed moment being JFK in the early 60s. Even so, 80% of the country is still some form of Lutheran or Baptist (if we aren't talking atheists, but that's a different problem). Unless you hold a very dim view of their zeal, you can't imagine there would would be a riot from Protestants if the government openly collaborated with Rome in these conditions, even with squishy elements in some areas there's still many people who prefer settling things old-school style. And with the way the government is right now, as dysfunctional as it is, that information would come out. I'd personally sooner put truck on them acting on their own behalves, or for a third party if there was a conspiracy.
If you think that either Rome cannot either be wrapped up or cleaned out, and that Protestants (and maybe Orthodox but they are a minority in the US) are too feckless to react to this AND that the government is compromised one way or the other on this end, then what I said regarding the final destination of all this is likely even more probable. If there is no supernatural faith, zeal or even just secular law applied in the most prosperous land in the world to tackle this one way or another, my suspicion of something massively bad and massively supernatural impending (and likely persecutions) to correct this becomes even more likely some point down the line; sooner rather than later given the gravity of the situation if that is the truth of it all combined.
i think your understandng of the zeitgeist in the context of modern history is flawed. the struggle of the american revolution was based on rejecting state tyranny in the same way that jeroboam and what was known as samaria rejected rehoboam’s and transitively judea’s implementation of his younger counsel’s advice to make the yoke of everyone who wasnt the house of judea grievous. i dont think the protestants are going to do anything for the same reason tha american-native tories didnt do anything but leave the colonies with their tails tucked in between their legs back to papist england in the same way that ALL churches who operate within the statist dialectic you imposed in this dialogue would. your accusation of the revolution being the machinations of freemasonry ignores the grassroots character of the revolution. read this book! it talks about people like issac davis, matthew patten, and the christian saints who went all up and down the colonies in the committees of safety and correspondence declaring No King but Jesus in their righteous indignation at the spiritual union between the state and the papal head causing the yoke of the people to be grievous. pete peters in his obvious flaws in preaching baptismal regeneration has very well prophesied of this generation.
He probably is misleading to people that think this is a formal website with all the pleasures that come with that. We're not formal people and I think we know exactly what he meant.
Also you realize the Pope and the Vatican along with it has political clout? You'd think ONE country would sentence the priests they suspiciously move into different countries by now.
are you anime posting while being ignorant of americian military hegemony for europe through NATO in earnest or feigned ignorance, madaam?
Christopher Wood
Are you going to claim ignorance when you figure out I didn't say that, or?
Christian White
Whatever you say, the united states isn't, and never was a christian nation, but a masonic shithole since day one. churchandstate.org.uk/2016/01/4-conservative-myths-about-the-founding-fathers/ The founding fathers were highly influenced by the enl*ghnment ( destroyed faith and tradition in europe ) and most of them were deists and hated religion. Jefferson was a literal fedora. Also the idea that there could only be one king but God is expressed by Thomas Pa*ne, another liberal "enlightned" philosopher anti-christ.
Gabriel Cooper
Also, most founding fathers were deists, Thus, not christian and uncapable of bearing good fruit. Look at America now.
Jackson Nelson
The god the founders worshiped was Mammon, and that's why America today is what it is, the Gay Disco: youtube.com/watch?v=d-OXt5NWcRs
