Can you restate the question in a fashion that makes sense? I got the part that you think we're a joke – typical Zig Forums – but how do you think …
… are incompatible things?
So, let's say I am following the railroad tracks God laid down before me. And? Did not God form my mind? Did He not shape my will? Did He not measure out the number of my days? Did He not make my tastes and inclinations and shape my personality before I was in the womb? So, how can I say I am my own man with full autonomy over my own life? How can I say that He has not chosen my steps when he controls the meteorite that crashes through my front window? Did He not form the very mind that will choose the path I will take?
Beside which, Calvinism isn't determinism … for us … what it does say is that God's sovereign Will reigns without any possible challenge, that whatever plans a man may make, God still controls his steps. I am responsible for my choices, but I am not my own. His Will reigns supreme.
… WE don't SEE it that way. Why is that so hard for people to grasp? Does the ant know it is inside a maze, if I set it within one? Does it worry itself day and night about the walls of the maze?
We are finite; He is infinite. This statement is common talk amongst cathodox, no? So, surely this is no conceptual stretch. He sees our lives as the thing He planned, we don't. We don't know what is about to happen in five minutes – a meteorite could fall through your ceiling for all you know – yet do you FEEL as though you are an automaton on the railtrack of God's "predestination" for you?
No, you don't. Indeed, we all think we are commanders of our own destiny. This is why there are atheists and unbelievers. The illusion or our perception seeeeeeems to be the reality.
But this is wrong. We are God's. And His plans are our lives.
You all know He is infinite and beyond comprehension, yet you stumble on this basic concept? Why?
I think sometimes QM offers not so much a distinct insight into such matters, but moreso the ability to view the problem beyond our previous confined spaces.
But maybe this is pretentious.
I am not sure I embrace the multiverse theorem, though, because its implication is that "somewhere, out there" is a "me" that didn't obstruct God. It's too much like the "evolutionary creationism" for me, as though God needed several tries to get the universe just how He wanted it.
I tend to think it is, at its core, a reverent statement regarding the supremacy of the Sovereignty of God.
The Bible is maxi-clear that this is the case, too.
Seems I will need to read the Aug 2007 link, but not now. It's clear to me that much in it I concur with.
Attached: determinism-choose-your-own-adventure.png (499x666, 412.17K)