Against Dispensationalism

I am interested in completely dismantling the various dispensationalist heresies. Give me your best arguments for and against Dispensationalism.

Anyone?

I am a dispensationalist because I find it to be most biblically consistent
Fire away with your criticisms so you can "completely dismantle" it

You'd probably get more replies if you didn't post anime porn in the OP. Sage.

Evangelicalism/Dispensationalism/Zionism/Globalism/War/Neoconservatism/Televangelists
Why do they all go so well together? Social engineering by Satanic Jews – Scofield reference Bible shipped into every seminary with the help of Jewish money. Embedded into America's subconscious.

English ideology, their penchant for justifying injustices by appeal to nature, see "free market capitalism" and Darwinism. English ideology was perversion of Christianity, alchemy/magic, then Newton comes along and wraps up everything into "Science" - love and strife become gravity and inertia (balancing forces). Adam Smith comes along and rewraps English Newton's these into economics - gravity and inertia become competition and self-interest.

Who is the father of Dispensationalism? John Nelson Darby. A bad anglo with a bad idea just like those mentioned above. Nasty lawyer CI Scofield takes it and expounds, notes at the bottom of his "study bible" were very influential. Then you have the likes of Hal Lindsey, Tim LaHaye, making up stupid "literalist" interpretations of Hebrew endtimes prophecy – Americans love it. Left Behind a national sensation. I could go on.

Now we have the Dave Ramsey / John MacArthur ilk providing all the "worldview" Christians need.

How do you explain the mystery in Romans 11? Protip: AD 70 was very significant.

You're not worth an argument. Just prayer. You people get Christians killed. Just the past 10 years alone ranks up there with Soviet or Roman persecution. And you pat yourselves on the back, thinking it's God's work.

I typed that up too quickly.

how?

Most people here will just attack the incidental Jew stuff and ignore the fact that at its core Dispensationalism is a hermeneutical system (hence the name). I would say this is because the board is overrun with papists and they don't really have a hermeneutic other than "the pope, what he said, thats it". The two biggest problems with dispensational hermeneutics is 1. It is not taught by the bible and 2. It is contradicted by what the bible says. Dispensationalists hold to a series of substantially different divine interactions with man called dispensations. This is the reason why they adore the Jews, because they so sever the old covenant from the new, that all the promises of the old law are made for and only for the Jewish nation. In classical dispensationalism it is taught that under the old law men were saved through their own works of the law, however ince this seriously undermines justification by faith and blatantly contradicts countless statements of Paul, this classical form has fallen out of favor in favor of less consistent systems where each of these different covenants has the same method of salvation.
Obviously, this is not something that is taught or reflected in the bible, but we are told that God made a covenant with Adam predicated on Adam's personal holiness (Gen 2:15-17), that when Adam broke this covenant by sinning all his progeny fell in their covenant head (Gen 3:17-19, Rom 5:12-14), that to rectify the problem of this curse Jesus Christ came and died for our sins, and founded a new and gracious covenant predicated on His righteousness and death (Gal 3:10-18, Rom 4:1-25), which justifies all the members of the covenant (Gal 3:1-9) and that this has been the selfsame covenant of grace from the repentance of Adam down to this very day. Hence, the promises of the old law properly belong to the Church, since they were made to the Church.

Last time someone said something like this they self-identified as a classical dispensationalist and stated they were to defend dispensationalism and when I provided a thorough refutation of the doctrine they cowered away and failed to respond.

i'd like to read it if you have that saved

I consider myself a progressive dispensationalist