Do Protestants still believe the Pope is the Antichrist?

Well, Pope St Gregory the Great said: "I say it without the least hesitation, whoever calls himself the universal bishop, or desires this title, is, by his pride, the precursor of Antichrist, because he thus attempts to raise himself above the others."

What does this even mean? You're telling me there's no been bout of homosexuality among the clergy in the Anglican Church? Or never has been? Christ never promised that we would not suffer the presence of evil men, Christ never threw out Judas either. Yet, they will be sifted in the end.

Anglicanism has been swept away by homosexuals and nonbelievers, so no… I'm not saying Anglicanism is perfect.

My concerns with Rome are far more than gay clergy and pedo priests/bishops

Gregory also said:

"The Apostolic See is, by the ordering of God, set over all Churches."newadvent.org/fathers/360203030.htm

"As to what they say about the Church of Constantinople, who can doubt that it is subject to the Apostolic See, as both the most pious lord the emperor and our brother the bishop of that city continually acknowledge? Yet, if this or any other Church has anything that is good, I am prepared in what is good to imitate even my inferiors, while prohibiting them from things unlawful."newadvent.org/fathers/360205041.htm

It is the See of Peter "to whom was committed the care and primacy of the whole Church"; as such it is the caput fidei. Gregory asserted that "the See of Constantinople is subject to the Apostolic See," and that there was no bishop who was not subject to the See of Rome, "which is set over all the churches." encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gregory-great-i-st-pope

"Through the observance of such custom both the Apostolic See may retain the power belonging to it, and at the same time may not diminish the rights which it has conceded to others."(newadvent.org/fathers/360203030.htm)

"If any of the four patriarchs had done such a thing," he wrote again to a bishop who had disobeyed his orders [ii:50], "such contumacy could not have been passed over without the gravest scandal."biblicalcatholic.com/apologetics/num7.htm

Nope!

Not all Methodists are "liberal". Best not to lump everyone into a single batch, ya know?