This is a very nice article on Christmas and Easter

Read it, fool. December 25th was of no significance to roman pagans until 274 AD.

And so what? What does it prove?

So does this mean that celebrating the birth of Christ is a pagan thing?

Why do we have to rebuke the same bullshit every year?
Every retard attributes that guy with changing christianity from whatever meme version of pure christianity he believes in
Explained here:

Also, it's extrapolated from the Christians celebrated the Epiphany only(Armenians still do),
In every country in Europe, it's either Passover or something related to Christ.
The planet doesn't revolve around the anglos, as much as they'd like.
The only reason the Oster theory is even a thing, is because an ancient monk from England wrote an off-hand remark, that he heard some peasants saying the name MIGHT come from an old goddess.

Attached: easter-european-languages.jpg (2000x2000, 1.49M)

Which pagan festivals were on December 25th?

And there's no record of this goddess prior to Bede, the monk, saying that theory.

Holidays are strange fire so it's a sin to observe them.

Latin was the language of the Catholic Church until V2, and it's Pascha in Latin. It's only Easter in English.

Pascha is ultimately of Semitic origin.
From Latin pascha, from Ancient Greek πάσχα (páskha, “Passover”), from Aramaic פסחא‎ (paskha), from Hebrew פסח‎ (pesakh).

It means it was a Roman Christian holy day long before.myou have the reading comprehension of a kindergartener. Not surprising, since you're a neopagan.

So we are on the same page dude.
I misread you I though you were justifying the pagan shit.