Knowing that the doctrine of the Trinity does not originate from Judaism...

Knowing that the doctrine of the Trinity does not originate from Judaism, how did it begin to be spread among the primitive Christians and how did it become doctrine?

Pic not related.

Attached: 1525214342782.png (559x836, 852.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bible.org/article/textual-problem-1-john-57-8
larryhurtado.wordpress.com/tag/pre-existence-of-christ/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because it is mentioned in the Scriptures and by Christ Himself, hence it could not merely be ignored or glossed over. There were various attempts to understand it or codify it to some extent by theologians and philosophers which led to the eventual term "Trinity" popping up in the late 2nd Century and its definition as we have it today.

Though, why you didn't bother to just read the Wiki article is beyond me.

primitive?

There are stories that the verses mentioning the trinity (father, son and holy spirit) were later added by the Catholic translations. Is that true? Specifically, verses that put the Holy Spirit as a person of the Trinity.


Early christianity, we call it "primitive" in Brazil, at least.

According to what consensus? When did this happen? We have manuscripts from the 2nd and 3rd centuries speaking of the Trinity, not to mention the writings of all the Church Fathers from Polycarp (1st/2ndc) onwards.

...

The infallible proof that exists about the trinity is 1 John 5:7-8, but…

bible.org/article/textual-problem-1-john-57-8

Besides in this text, there do not seem to be other mentions of the holy spirit as if it were a person of the trinity, detailing it more as the personified power of God or something like that.

I don't believe much in what I'm writing, so I came here asking for help.

Não, deixa de ser macaco e estude em vez de acreditar no que te dizem. The Nicene creed is of 320 AD, in the original Greek. There is no translation.
If you want the justification for it, you should study what's called "The Nicene Creed" or "Credo Nicênico". There is not a single line that is not a condemnation of a heresy, including yours which is called Arianism from the heretic bishop Arius. Arius got slapped by St. Nicholas, died on the toilet, and the Orthodox Church has a yearly feast over his death.

Wouldn't Arianism be not believing that Jesus is God? Because I don't question that, there are several other passages quoting God the Father and God the Son, my problem is with God the Holy Spirit.

Meua migo, eu vim aqui justamente para saber por onde começar. Tenho alguns livros (que me recomendaram) falando em contra a trindade católica, por isso precisava alguns que falassem a favor, para assim poder tirar minhas conclusões.

A pretty good explanation of the Trinity